Engagement and Satisfaction in Team-Based Learning and Generative AI for Medical Terminology Learning
Authors
Department of International Business and Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia/Research Group: Sustaining Quality of Life, EK Social Creativity & Innovation, Research Nexus UiTM (ReNeU), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of International Business and Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of International Business and Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of International Business and Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of International Business and Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia/Research Group: Sustaining Quality of Life, EK Social Creativity & Innovation, Research Nexus UiTM (ReNeU), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601177
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 16781-16790
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-22
Accepted: 2026-06-27
Published: 2026-07-14
Abstract
While medical terminology is commonly taught to healthcare or science-based students, business and management students in health-related programs often struggle due to the complexity of medical word roots, prefixes, and suffixes. The incorporation of diverse teaching approaches helps bridge the learning gap by supporting students in mastering essential medical terms that are critical for their future roles in health administration and management. The objectives of this study were to assess the satisfaction, engagement, and academic achievement of students in medical terminology course using Team Based Learning (TBL) and artificial intelligence (AI) powered learning versus lecture-based method. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to July 2025 within a health administration undergraduate program at a major public university in Malaysia, evaluating three instructional delivery modes across a 14-week course using paired sample t tests. A total of 79 students taking the Health Terminological course participated in the study. Results: Academic achievement and engagement were significantly higher under TBL and AI powered learning compared to traditional lectures. However, these gains were not reflected in the affective domain, as overall student satisfaction levels remained comparable across all three instructional methods. Conclusion: These findings reveal that a significant engagement-satisfaction trade-off is at play. To capture the full value of active methods, instructional design must address this imbalance, prioritizing not only cognitive engagement but also efforts to strategically mitigate the perception of excessive workload so that increased rigor fully translates into positive affective and learning outcomes.
Keywords
medical terminology, team-based learning, AI powered learning, Malaysia.
Downloads
References
1. Adewale MD, Azeta A, Abayomi-Alli A, Sambo-Magaji A. (2024) Impact of artificial intelligence adoption on students' academic performance in open and distance learning: A systematic literature review. Heliyon. 2024 Nov 1;10(22):e40025. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2024.e40025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alizadeh M, Masoomi R, Mafinejad MK, Parmelee D, Khalaf RJ, Norouzi A. (2024) Team-based learning in health professions education: an umbrella review. BMC Med Educ. 24: 1131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06147-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Azizam, N. A., Maon, S. N., Ali Husin, L. I., Ahmad, S. N. A., & Mat Som, R. (2020). Team-Based Learning on Teaching Medical and Health Terminology. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(SI1), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5iSI1.2317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Azizam, N. A., Maon, S. N., Dzulkipli, M. R., & Aziz, N. I. S. A. (2019). Perception of Team Based Learning on Medical and Health Terminology Course. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i13/6243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Burgess, A., Haq, I., Bleasel, J., Roberts, C., Garsia, R., Randal, N., & Mellis, C. (2019). Team-based learning (TBL): a community of practice. BMC medical education, 19(1), 369. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1795-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Carlos V, Rodrigues M, Matos B, Gonçalves L, Ribeiro F and Fardilha M (2023) Engaging large classes of higher education students: a combination of spaced learning and team-based learning. Front. Educ. 8:1129763. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1129763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chiu, T. K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Costa, E. B., Fonseca, B., Santana, M. A., de Araújo, F. F., & Rego, J. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational data mining techniques for early prediction of students' academic failure in introductory programming courses. Computers in human behavior, 73, 247-256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Fatmi, M., Hartling, L., Hillier, T., Campbell, S., & Oswald, A. E. (2013). The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30. Medical Teacher, 35(12), e1608–e1624. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.849802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ghorbani, N., Karbalay-Doust, S., & Noorafshan, A. (2014). Is a team-based learning approach to anatomy teaching superior to didactic lecturing? Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 14(1), e120. doi: 10.12816/0003345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Haidet, P., Kubitz, K., & McCormack, W. T. (2014). Analysis of the team-based learning literature: TBL comes of age. Journal on excellence in college teaching, 25(3-4), 303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kozanitis, A., & Nenciovici, L. (2023). Effect of Active Learning versus Traditional Lecturing on the Learning Achievement of College Students in Humanities and Social Sciences: A Meta-Analysis. Higher Education, 86, 1377-1394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Malaysia Qualification Agency (MQA), 2021. Programme Standards: Business Studies, Second Edition [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Malaysia Qualification Agency (MQA), Programme Standards: Medical and Health Science 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mariam, S., Khawaja, K. F., Qaisar, M. N., & Ahmad, F. (2023). Blended learning sustainability in business schools: Role of quality of online teaching and immersive learning experience. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100776. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team‐based learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 2008(116), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.330 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Med Teach. 2012;34(5): e275-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Pérez-Guillén S, Carrasco-Uribarren A, Yeung E, Serra-Llobet P, Pardos-Aguilella P, Cabanillas-Barea S. Implementing Team-Based Learning in Physiotherapy Education: Students' Perceptions and Preferences Compared to the Traditional Lecture. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Jun 11; 16:1019-1027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Popenici SAD, Kerr S. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017;12(1):22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Shan Wang, Fang Wang, Zhen Zhu, Jingxuan Wang, Tam Tran, Zhao Du, Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review, Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 252, Part A, 2024, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sit, C., Srinivasan, R., Amlani, A., Muthuswamy, K., Azam, A., Monzon, L., & Poon, D. S. (2020). Attitudes and perceptions of UK medical students towards artificial intelligence and radiology: A multicentre survey. Insights into Imaging, 11(14), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0830-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Sterpu I, Herling L, Nordquist J, Rotgans J, Acharya G. (2024) Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students-a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 24:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04975-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. UiTM Student Portal, available at https://online.uitm.edu.my/permohonan.cfm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Wang B, Jin S, Huang M, Zhang K, Zhou Q, Zhang X, et al. (2024) Application of lecture-and-team-based learning in stomatology: in-class and online. BMC Med Educ. 24:264. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05235-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L.R. et al. (2024). The Effects of Problem-Based, Project-Based, and Case-Based Learning on Students’ Motivation: a Meta-Analysis. Educ Psychol Rev 36, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Xie ZB, Cheng XY, Li XY, Zhang YF. (2025). Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):580. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07175-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Zhou W, Liu Q. (2025) Effect of university teachers' teaching style on EFL learners' classroom engagement: the mediating role of self-efficacy. BMC Psychol. 13:749. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03069-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study