Intelligent Tutoring System Learning Strategy: A Supplemental Interactive Learning Material on Mirrors and Lenses for Grade 10 Science Students
Authors
University of Southeastern Philippines, Inigo St., Bo., Obrero, Davao City Philippines (Philippines)
University of Southeastern Philippines, Inigo St., Bo., Obrero, Davao City Philippines (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601179
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 16796-16803
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-24
Accepted: 2026-06-29
Published: 2026-07-14
Abstract
The increasing use of self-learning modules in science education has presented instructional challenges, particularly in teaching abstract topics such as Mirrors and Lenses. This study aims to identify the issues and challenges encountered by Grade 10 science teachers in teaching Mirrors and Lenses using the Department of Education's Self-Learning Module (SLM), examine the coping strategies they employ to address these challenges, and develop a supplemental learning material utilizing an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) learning strategy. The study will be conducted in one cluster of the Division of Davao City and will involve twelve (12) Grade 10 science teachers from six (6) public secondary schools selected through purposive sampling. A qualitative descriptive research design will be employed, using a validated Focus Group Discussion (FGD) guide as the primary data collection instrument. The gathered data will be transcribed and analyzed through thematic analysis to identify recurring themes and patterns related to teachers' experiences. Findings from the study will serve as the basis for the development of an ITS-based supplemental learning material designed to provide interactive simulations, step-by-step tutorials, immediate feedback, simplified instructional content, guided learning activities, and a basic AI literacy and verification component. The proposed instructional material is expected to support science teachers in improving students' conceptual understanding and engagement in learning Mirrors and Lenses while complementing the existing self-learning modules.
Keywords
Intelligent Tutoring System, Mirrors and Lenses, Self-Learning Module, qualitative research, science education, supplemental learning material, thematic analysis.
Downloads
References
1. Ally, M. (2019). Competency profile of the digital and online teacher in future education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Andaya, O. J. F. (2021). Teaching science in the new normal: Exploring science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in modular distance learning. Journal of Science and Technology Research, 3(2), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education system alignment for 21st century skills: Focus on assessment. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/education-system-alignment-for-21st-century-skills-focus-on-assessment/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Department of Education. (2020). Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs). https://commons.deped.gov.ph/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Department of Education. (2022). Philippine Basic Education Report 2022. https://www.deped.gov.ph/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Fernandez, J. R., & Lapuz, A. M. (2020). Effectiveness of an intelligent tutoring application in enhancing junior high school students' science performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1), 53–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Graesser, A. C., Hu, X., Nye, B. D., & Sottilare, R. A. (2018). Intelligent tutoring systems. In N. J. Smelser, P. B. Baltes, & M. Pitt-Catsouphes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Guevara, A. C., & Ignacio, L. M. (2021). A pilot study on the development and utilization of a prototype intelligent tutoring system in Earth Science for junior high school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 64–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Designing for complementarity: Teacher and student needs for orchestration support in AI-enhanced classrooms. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Mousavinasab, E., Kardan, A. A., Yaghmaee, M., & Rezaei, H. (2021). Adaptive learning using intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Nye, B. D. (2015). Intelligent tutoring systems by the numbers: A meta-analysis of meta-analyses. In R. Sottilare, A. Graesser, X. Hu, & H. Holden (Eds.), Design recommendations for intelligent tutoring systems (Vol. 3, pp. 197–206). U.S. Army Research Laboratory. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Pu, J., Li, S., Guo, M., Chen, X., & Xiong, Z. (2024). Graph neural network based intelligent tutoring system: A survey. Neurocomputing, 610, 128442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Spitzer, M. W. H., Bardach, L., Strittmatter, Y., Meyer, J., & Moeller, K. (2024). Evaluating the content structure of intelligent tutor systems: A psychological network analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. UNESCO. (2021). Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Global Education Monitoring Report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Verdú, E., Regueras, L. M., Verdú, M. J., de Castro, J. P., & Pérez, M. Á. (2017). A study of the effectiveness of adaptive learning environments using student learning styles. Computers & Education, 113, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Zhai, X., Zhang, M., Wang, J., & Li, M. (2021). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K–12 students' learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 32, 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100376 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zhu, M., & Zhai, X. (2022). An AI-powered intelligent tutoring system for physics optics learning: A study on addressing students' misconceptions in image formation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09960-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Bionote [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Jenelou Mantong is a Grade 10 Science teacher and graduate student pursuing a Master of Arts in Science Education at the University of Southeastern Philippines. She earned her Bachelor of Secondary Education major in Science in 2019. Her research interests include physics education, modular learning, and AI-integrated instructional materials, particularly Intelligent Tutoring Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Fedelis C. Bonocan, PhD, is a professor at the University of Southeastern Philippines and serves as University Registrar Directress. She holds a Doctor of Philosophy degree and has extensive experience in higher education. Her research interests include educational management, teacher education, and curriculum development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study