Contributing Factors Affecting Online AD Clicking Behavior and their Impact to Consumers’ Choice

Authors

Rae Sheena L. Magtuba

College of Information Technology and Computing and College of Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines (Philippines)

Erven T. Macabenlar

College of Information Technology and Computing and College of Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines (Philippines)

Reca S. Bautista

College of Information Technology and Computing and College of Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines (Philippines)

Ver Neljan B. Dala

College of Information Technology and Computing and College of Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines (Philippines)

Yasmin Hannah S. Retuerto

College of Information Technology and Computing and College of Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines (Philippines)

Glenda D. Libed

College of Information Technology and Computing and College of Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601188

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 16897-16909

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-22

Accepted: 2026-06-27

Published: 2026-07-14

Abstract

This study examined the factors affecting online advertisement-clicking behavior and their influence on consumers' choice among respondents from Limketkai, Cagayan de Oro City, and the University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines (USTP). Specifically, it profiled respondents according to age, gender, and social status; assessed their perceptions of consumer need, advertisement attractiveness, advertisement-clicking behavior, and consumers' choice; examined differences in advertisement-clicking behavior across consumer need and advertisement attractiveness groups; and determined the influence of consumer need and advertisement attractiveness on consumers' choice. A descriptive research design was employed using a validated self-administered questionnaire completed by 100 purposively selected respondents. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and simple regression analyses were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed generally low levels of consumer need, advertisement attractiveness, and advertisement-clicking behavior, whereas consumers' choice was rated at a fair level. No significant differences were observed in advertisement-clicking behavior across consumer need and advertisement attractiveness groups. However, consumer need and advertisement attractiveness significantly and positively predicted consumers' choice, with consumer need demonstrating the stronger predictive effect. The findings indicate that advertisement-clicking behavior and consumers' choice represent distinct dimensions of online consumer response and underscore the importance of consumer-centered, relevant, credible, personalized, and visually appealing advertising strategies in influencing purchasing decisions.

Keywords

online advertising; advertisement-clicking behavior; consumer choice; consumer need; advertisement attractiveness

Downloads

References

1. Akram, U., Junaid, M., Zafar, A. U., Li, Z., & Fan, M. (2021). Online purchase intention in Chinese social commerce platforms: Being emotional or rational? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102669 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alalwan, A. A., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Algharabat, R. (2017). Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aljukhadar, M., & Senecal, S. (2021). The effect of consumer-activated mind-set and product involvement on the compliance with recommender system advice. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211031550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barry, T. E. (1987). The development of the hierarchy of effects: An historical perspective. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 10(1–2), 251–295. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biswas, D., Abell, A., & Chacko, R. (2024). Curvy digital marketing designs: Virtual elements with rounded shapes enhance online click-through rates. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(3), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Boateng, H., & Okoe, A. F. (2015). Consumers' attitude towards social media advertising and their behavioural response: The moderating role of corporate reputation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 9(4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2015-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brackett, L. K., & Carr, B. N. (2001). Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: Consumer vs. mature student attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-41-5-23-32 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Busen, S. M. S., Mustaffa, C. S., & Mohamad, B. (2016). Impacts of online banner advertisement on consumers' purchase intention: A theoretical framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3(1), 75–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chandra, S., Verma, S., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Personalization in personalized marketing: Trends and ways forward. Psychology & Marketing, 39(8), 1529–1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dehghani, M., Niaki, M. K., Ramezani, I., & Sali, R. (2016). Evaluating the influence of YouTube advertising for attraction of young customers. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dittmar, H., Long, K., & Meek, R. (2004). Buying on the Internet: Gender differences in online and conventional buying motivations. Sex Roles, 50(5–6), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018896.35251.c7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Duffett, R. G. (2015). Facebook advertising's influence on intention-to-purchase and purchase among Millennials. Internet Research, 25(4), 498–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2014-0020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gravetter, F. J., Wallnau, L. B., Forzano, L.-A. B., & Witnauer, J. E. (2024). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147–170). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hanaysha, J. R. (2022). Impact of social media marketing features on consumer's purchase decision in the fast-food industry: Brand trust as a mediator. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hwang, Y., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Customer self-service systems: The effects of perceived Web quality on purchase intention in online shopping. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jebarajakirthy, C., Maseeh, H. I., Morshed, Z., Shankar, A., Arli, D., & Pentecost, R. (2021). Mobile advertising: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(6), 1258–1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12728 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Li, F., Larimo, J., & Leonidou, L. C. (2021). Social media marketing strategy: Definition, conceptualization, taxonomy, validation, and future agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00733-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Martins, J., Costa, C., Oliveira, T., Gonçalves, R., & Branco, F. (2019). How smartphone advertising influences consumers' purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 94, 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233–346). Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nguyen, H. H., Nguyen-Viet, B., Nguyen, Y. T. H., & Le, T. H. (2022). Understanding online purchase intention: The mediating role of attitude towards advertising. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2095950. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2095950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, N., & Tran, T. P. (2022). The influence of online advertising characteristics on consumers' purchase intention: The mediating role of advertising value. Sustainability, 14(20), 13232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Peng, C., & Kim, Y. G. (2014). Stimulus–organism–response (S–O–R) framework to online shopping behavior. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13(3–4), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2014.944437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Priporas, C.-V., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers' expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Roberts, M. L., & Zahay, D. (2013). Internet marketing: Integrating online and offline strategies (3rd ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tran, G. A., & Strutton, D. (2020). Comparing email and SNS users: Investigating e-servicescape, customer reviews, trust, loyalty and E-WOM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, Article 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Vejačka, M. (2012). Facebook advertising and its efficiency on the Slovak market. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 15(1), 116–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Whiting, A., & Williams, D. J. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zhang, J., & Mao, E. (2016). From online motivations to ad clicks and to behavioral intentions: An empirical study of consumer response to social media advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 33(3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20862 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles