Beyond Knowledge: The Influence of Teachers' Attitudes, Knowledge and Skills on Discipline Management in Rural Secondary Schools
Authors
Faculty of Education and Sports Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (Malaysia)
Dg Norizah Ag Kiflee @ Dzulkifli
Faculty of Education and Sports Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601307
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 19053-19067
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-03
Accepted: 2026-07-09
Published: 2026-07-17
Abstract
This study examined the influence of teachers’ attitudes, knowledge, and skills on discipline management in rural secondary schools in Sabah, Malaysia. Effective discipline management remains an important aspect of school administration, particularly within rural educational settings where teachers often encounter diverse behavioural and contextual challenges. Guided by the Professional Competence Continuum Model, the study employed a quantitative non-experimental cross-sectional correlational survey design. Data were collected from 317 teachers selected from 19 rural secondary schools in the Interior Division of Sabah using a multistage sampling procedure. The research instrument measured four constructs, namely teachers’ attitudes, teachers’ knowledge, teachers’ skills, and discipline management. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis through IBM SPSS Statistics Version 30. The findings revealed that teachers’ attitudes, knowledge, skills, and discipline management were all at high levels. Correlation analysis indicated significant positive relationships between teachers’ attitudes, knowledge, skills, and discipline management. However, multiple regression analysis showed that only teachers’ attitudes (β = .289, p < .001) and teachers’ skills (β = .311, p < .001) significantly predicted discipline management, whereas teachers’ knowledge did not demonstrate a significant predictive effect (β = .062, p = .391). Teachers’ skills emerged as the strongest predictor of discipline management. The findings demonstrate that disciplinary knowledge alone does not independently predict discipline management effectiveness when considered alongside teachers' attitudes and practical disciplinary skills. Instead, teachers' attitudes and practical disciplinary skills emerged as the primary competency dimensions influencing effective discipline management in rural secondary schools. This study contributes to the literature on teacher competence and discipline management by providing empirical evidence from underrepresented rural secondary schools and offers important implications for competency-based teacher professional development and educational policy.
Keywords
Teacher Competence; Discipline Management; Teachers' Attitudes
Downloads
References
1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., Köller, M. M., & Klusmann, U. (2018). Measuring teachers’ social-emotional competence: Development and validation of a situational judgment test. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Azano, A. P., & Stewart, T. T. (2015). Exploring place and practicing justice: Preparing preservice teachers for success in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(9), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & S. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 25–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bear, G. G. (2010). School discipline and self-discipline: A practical guide to promoting prosocial student behavior. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Collie, R. J., Perry, N. E., & Martin, A. J. (2020). Teachers’ psychological functioning in the workplace: Exploring the roles of contextual beliefs, need satisfaction, and personal characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000404 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of classroom management (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gregory, A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., & Gerewitz, J. (2021). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher-student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 31(2), 203–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1798938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Guerriero, S. (Ed.). (2017). Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643–680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Lazarides, R., Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2020). Teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy, perceived classroom management and teaching contexts from beginning until mid-career. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Showalter, D., Klein, R., Johnson, J., & Hartman, S. (2019). Why rural matters 2018–2019: The time is now. Rural School and Community Trust. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1–2), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J019v24n01_03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Wang, M.-T., Degol, J. L., & Henry, D. A. (2024). Classroom climate and adolescent development: Current evidence and future directions. Educational Psychologist, 59(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2268742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study