A Study of ChatGPT and Writing Through the Lens of Social Cognitive Theory

Academic writing is perceived as a challenging task among ESL students as it involves cognitive, metacognitive, and self-regulatory skills. New norms of support in writing processes have been introduced with the emergence of artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT. Therefore, grounded in Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, this quantitative study explores how environmental (including these environmental AI shifts), personal cognitive, and behavioural factors influence the students’ academic writing processes. It aims to investigate if there are significant relationships among the three factors based on demographic variables, namely, genders, academic disciplines, and linguistic proficiencies. In addition, the study also examines ESL students’ perceptions of how these factors influence their writing processes. To achieve these, a survey was conducted among 165 ESL students from a Malaysian public university. The data, which was obtained through a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, was analysed using SPSS. The analyses indicate a significant relationship between personal factors and gender, and different academic disciplines. On the other hand, linguistic proficiencies show a significant relationship across environmental and personal factors. Furthermore, students perceived environmental factors, particularly the use of ChatGPT, as a tool that encourages critical thinking and improves academic performance. The findings also revealed that the students relied on metacognitive and cognitive writing strategies and reflected their high resilience and effort regulation despite showing a lower consistency in regular writing practice. This study offers a foundation for more focused instructional interventions in higher education.

ChatGPT, Academic Writing, Environmental Factors, Personal Factors, Behavioural Factors, Social Cognitive Theory

1. Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 6159-6172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alghamdi, A. A. (2025). University students’ perceptions of generative AI for critical thinking and creativity: The influence of self-efficacy and disciplinary differences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2600476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alih, N. A. C., Komarudin, N. E., Fakhruddin, S. S., Subramaniam, S. K., & Rahmat, N. H. (2025). Exploring writing strategies through social cognitive theory among Malaysian university students. Asian People Journal, 8(2), 28-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.37231/apj.2025.8.2.744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in research instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandura, A. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 349–373). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Deep, P. D., Martirosyan, N., Ghosh, N., & Rahaman, M. S. (2025). ChatGPT in ESL higher education: Enhancing writing, engagement, and learning outcomes. Information, 16(4), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Diasti, K. S. (2026). EFL students’ self-regulation in the writing process using ChatGPT. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.30587/jetlal.v10i1.10837 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. He, L. (2024) The application of SPSS correlation analysis in the study of precision teaching of English in universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hsu, H. P. (2025). An autoethnographic study of ESL academic writing with ChatGPT: From psychological insights to the SUPER framework. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2543113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Khairuddin, Z., Daud, K. M., Amran, N. A., Sabri, S., & Rahmat, N. H. (2025). Integrating social cognitive theory into ESL writing pedagogy: A study of learners’ strategies and perceptions. Asian People Journal, 8(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2025.8.2.822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khairuddin, Z. Rahmat, N. H., Noor, M. M., & Khairuddin, Z. (2021) The use of rhetorical strategies in argumentative essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(S3), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Owunna, R., Ajobi, A., & Akintoke, V. A. (2025). Enhancing academic performance through social interaction: A theoretical exploration of social cognitive theory. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 2656-2666. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pham, M., & Doan, B. N. (2025). The use of ChatGPT in EFL students as a learning assistant in their writing skills: A literature review. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pham, L., Klau, T., & Bateh, J. (2025). Key factors influencing intention to use ChatGPT: An empirical study of U.S. students. Acta Psychologica, 260 (2025), 1-13. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105516 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rahmat, N. H. (2021) An investigative study of cognitive and metacognitive paraphrasing strategies in ESL writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(3), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Raoofi, S., Miri, A., Gharibi, J., & Malaki, B. (2017). Assessing and validating a writing strategy scale for undergraduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 624-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rawas, S. (2024). ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 6895-6908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12114-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sagredo-Ortiz, S., & Kloss, S. (2025). Academic writing strategies in university students from three disciplinary areas: Design and validation of an instrument. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1600497. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1600497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Shah, M. A. (2024). Meaning and Statistical Analysis of T-Tests in SPSS. Journal of Saidu Medical College, 14(1), 64-65. https://doi.org/10.522006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Shen, X. & Tao, Y. (2025). Metacognitive strategies, AI-based writing self-efficacy and writing anxiety in AI-assisted writing contexts: A structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 7 (1), 70-87 https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20250105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(5), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Xu, T., & Jumaat, N. F. (2024). ChatGPT-empowered writing strategies in EFL students' academic writing: Calibre, challenges and chances. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(15), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i15.49219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Yang, Y., Zhang, S., & Li, Y. (2026). The influence of AI on critical thinking and creativity in L2 learning contexts: A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Intelligence, 14(5), Article 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14050078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zienefuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas, E. K., & Marna, C. (2021). Impact of demographic survey questions on response rate and measurement: A randomized experiment. Survey Practice, 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study