AACSB Accreditation and Quality Excellence in Business Education: A Strategic Framework for Continuous Improvement, Innovation, and Global Competitiveness

Business schools worldwide are facing increasing pressure to demonstrate academic quality, stakeholder value, and global relevance. The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) accreditation has emerged as the most prestigious international quality benchmark for business education. AACSB accreditation provides a comprehensive framework that promotes strategic management, learner success, thought leadership, societal impact, and continuous improvement. This article examines the role of AACSB accreditation in enhancing quality excellence within business schools and explores how the accreditation process fosters innovation, stakeholder engagement, and global competitiveness. The study highlights key AACSB standards, institutional benefits, implementation challenges, and best practices for sustaining accreditation. The article concludes that AACSB accreditation is not merely a compliance exercise but a strategic tool for achieving sustainable excellence in business education.

AACSB Accreditation, Quality Assurance, Business Education, Continuous Improvement, Assurance of Learning, Global Competitiveness, Higher Education Quality

1. AACSB International. (2020). 2020 Guiding Principles and Standards for Business Accreditation. Tampa, FL: AACSB International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. AACSB International. (2023). AACSB Business Accreditation Standards. Tampa, FL: AACSB International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Materu, P. (2007). Higher Education Quality Assurance in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Eaton, J. S. (2012). An Overview of U.S. Accreditation. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Romero, E. J. (2008). AACSB Accreditation: Addressing Faculty Concerns. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 245–255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2012). The International Branch Campus as Transnational Strategy in Higher Education. Higher Education, 64(5), 627–645. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. AACSB International. (2020). 2020 Guiding Principles and Standards for Business Accreditation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. AACSB International. (2023). Business Accreditation Standards. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Trapnell, J. E. (2007). AACSB International Accreditation: The Value Proposition and a Look to the Future. Journal of Management Development, 26(1), 67–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Romero, E. J. (2008). AACSB Accreditation: Addressing Faculty Concerns. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 245–255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Julian, S. D., & Ofori-Dankwa, J. C. (2006). Is Accreditation Good for the Strategic Decision Making of Traditional Business Schools? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(2), 225–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study