Field Engineer-To-Project Ratio and Quality of DPWH Infrastructure Projects
Authors
Master of Science in Engineering Management University of La Salette, Inc., Santiago City (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100601402
Subject Category: Engineering
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 20478-20490
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-02
Accepted: 2026-07-07
Published: 2026-07-21
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between the profile of field engineer allocation and the level of project quality in DPWH infrastructure projects in Isabela Legislative District 3. Specifically, it determined the profile of field engineer allocation in terms of number of engineers assigned per project, number of projects handled by each engineer, project size, project duration per engineer, and workload and assigned duties. It also assessed the level of project quality in terms of compliance with standards, defects or errors found, reworks or corrections needed, timeliness of completion, and safety and durability of projects.
The study employed a descriptive-correlational research design and involved 46 technical personnel from the DPWH Isabela Third District Engineering Office. Data were gathered using a survey questionnaire and were analyzed using frequency and percentage distribution, weighted mean, and Chi-Square Test of Independence. Findings revealed that most projects were assigned with 3 to 5 engineers, while most field engineers handled more than 6 projects. The projects were mostly medium-scale, commonly lasted 6 to 12 months, and the workload was generally described as moderate, although some respondents experienced heavy to very heavy duties. The level of project quality was rated as high, with an overall mean of 3.85. Among the quality indicators, compliance with standards obtained the highest rating, while reworks or corrections needed obtained the lowest but still remained within the high level category. The Chi-Square Test showed that there was no significant relationship between the profile of field engineer allocation and the level of project quality, leading to the acceptance of the null hypothesis. Based on the findings, the study recommends strengthening workload monitoring, balanced engineer allocation, regular supervision, and improved project management practices to sustain and further enhance the quality of DPWH infrastructure projects.
Keywords
field engineer allocation, engineer-to-project ratio, project quality, DPWH infrastructure projects
Downloads
References
1. Abd Muien, N. (2023). Supervisory workload and its impact on construction project performance: A quantitative study. Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Thesis Repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aljassmi, H., & Han, S. (2022). Quality control challenges and rework factors in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(3), 04022002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alruqaishi, A., & Scott, D. (2023). Durability failures in construction and their impact on long-term performance. Buildings, 13(2), 421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bahr, M., & Laszig, L. (2021). Productivity development in the construction industry and human capital: A literature review. ArXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bulos, R. (2021). Citizen-based assessment of public works and infrastructure services in Isabela Province. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Guo, B., Zhang, L., & Fan, Y. (2023). Digital workforce allocation models for improving construction project supervision. Automation in Construction, 149, 104802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hwang, B. G., Shan, M., & Zhu, L. (2020). Factors affecting productivity in construction projects: Role of manpower allocation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(2), 383–402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ibrahim, A., Zayed, T., & Lafhaj, Z. (2023). Quantifying the cost of quality in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(1), 04022120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ibrahim, A., Zayed, T., & Lafhaj, Z. (2024). Construction performance measurement and human resource allocation in construction projects. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kim, J., & Kim, S. (2021). Workload imbalance and decision fatigue among construction managers: Implications for project outcomes. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(4), 04021033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Love, P. E. D., Matthews, J., & Fang, W. (2020). Rework in construction: The role of errors and violations. Safety Science, 124, 104580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Mokhlespour Esfahani, M., Al-Hajj, A., & Hamid, Z. (2024). Effect of site supervision on construction project performance: Evidence from multiple countries. Sustainability, 16(4), 2456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Olanrewaju, A., Abdul-Azeez, O., & Adesina, T. (2022). Influence of supervisory load on construction quality in public infrastructure projects. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 14(2), 1091–1105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Perera, B. A. K. S., Rameezdeen, R., & Chileshe, N. (2021). Competency-based manpower allocation for improving construction supervision quality. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(5), 777–792. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Shan, M., Le, Y., & Chan, A. P. C. (2020). Effects of monitoring frequency on construction quality in large-scale infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(11), 04020134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Sitohang, A., Mohamed, S., & Ismail, F. (2022). Construction contractor performance improvement strategy based on the quality of the construction manpower using Indonesia standards. Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(4), 106–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Valdez, R., & Quezon, M. (2025). Attributes of project engineers and successful project outcomes in Isabela Second District Engineering Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Yusoff, N. I. M., Rahim, N. A., & Chuing, S. W. (2021). Skilled labor shortage and its impact on construction project performance. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(3), 712–729. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
- IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
- Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
- Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
- Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach