IJRISS Logo

Student's Literacy Competence: The Use of Guided Reading Model and the Sociocultural Perspective

Authors

Sri Dewi Nirmala

Master of Elementary Education, Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700017

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 213-227

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-08

Accepted: 2026-07-13

Published: 2026-07-22

Abstract

This study discusses literacy competence (LC) in elementary schools. Although LC is important, it does not meet adequate capability standards. This study aims to analyze LC through the Guided Reading (GR) Model and sociocultural factors. The research method uses Mixed Methods with an explanatory sequential design. The stages carried out are quasi-experimental, followed by descriptive analysis. This research was conducted on grade IV students in six elementary schools implementing the School Literacy Movement (GLS). The number of students is 200, consisting of 94 male students and 106 female students. The research instrument consists of tests, observations, questionnaires, and in-depth interviews with students, parents, and teachers. Data analysis using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. LC categories include literacy level, competence, and comprehension level. Research results: (1) the GR model is able to increase LC from low to medium levels; (2) the level of literacy comprehension increases from the literal factual category to the interpretive category; and (3) socio-cultural factors that affect LC, among others: book reading facilities, parental guidance, and the use of technology, which negatively affect LC. However, the findings do not support the assumption that technology use, by itself, increases LC; instead, its effect appears to depend on the presence of parental guidance and supervision. Further research, particularly using longitudinal or experimental designs, is needed to examine the impact of technology and mentoring patterns on LC development among elementary school students.

Keywords

School Literacy Movement, Literacy Skills, Model Guided Reading, Sociocultural Factors

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. R. Setiadi, “Sociocultural Intervention Strategy for Primary Literacy Teaching,” vol. 424, no. Icollite 2019, pp. 369–372, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200325.113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. S. D. Nirmala, “Problematika Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar Problematics of Students’ Low Literacy Ability in Elementary School Article History Abstract,” vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 393–402, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. D. Addae, “Adults who learn: Evaluating the social impact of an adult literacy project in rural South Africa,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 100115, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. A. Çakıroğlu, “The language acquisition approaches and the development of literacy skills in children,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 201–206, 2018, doi: 10.26822/iejee.2019248600. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. F. J. Morrison, R. A. Marks, A. D. Woods, and C. M. Connor, “Literacy,” Encycl. Infant Early Child. Dev., vol. 2, no. March 2019, pp. 260–272, 2020, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05837-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. D. Safi, P. Lefebvre, and M. Nader, Literacy acquisition: Reading development, 1st ed., vol. 173. Elsevier B.V., 2020. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64150-2.00017-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. A. P. Gutierrez de Blume, A. Katz, and J. Bass, “Impact of literacy across content on middle school students’ reading comprehension in a rural context,” J. Res. Read., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 284–300, 2021, doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. J. D. Nichols, I. hee Kim, and G. W. Nichols, “The effect of parent and community volunteerism on early literacy development,” Educ. Rev., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 411–426, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00131911.2018.1530638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. R. T. Pittman, S. Zhang, E. Binks-Cantrell, A. Hudson, and R. M. Joshi, “Teachers’ knowledge about language constructs related to literacy skills and student achievement in low socio-economic status schools,” Dyslexia, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 200–219, 2020, doi: 10.1002/dys.1628. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. S. Marmoah and J. I. S. Poerwanti, Suharno, “Literacy culture management of elementary school in Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 4, p. e09315, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. A. T. Barber and S. L. Klauda, “How Reading Motivation and Engagement Enable Reading Achievement: Policy Implications,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2372732219893385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. C. Condie and F. Pomerantz, “Elementary students’ literacy opportunities in an age of accountability and standards: Implications for teacher educators,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 92, p. 103058, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103058. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. M. Nicholas, N. Veresov, and J. C. Clark, “Guided reading – Working within a child’s zone of proximal development,” Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 30, no. PA, p. 100530, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. D. A. Rahma, R. Winarni, and Winarno, “The challenges and readiness of elementary school teachers in facing society 5.0 through online learning during the covid-19 pandemic,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 15–20, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3452144.3453743. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. X. M. Ngo, “A sociocultural perspective on second language writing teacher cognition: A Vietnamese teacher’s narrative,” System, vol. 78, pp. 79–90, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2018.08.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. M. M. Neumann, “Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 42, no. October 2016, pp. 239–246, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. F. Birgisdottir, S. Gestsdottir, and G. J. Geldhof, “Early predictors of first and fourth grade reading and math: The role of self-regulation and early literacy skills,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 53, pp. 507–519, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.05.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. A. Leopold, Downloaded by [ University of California , San Diego ] at 21 : 12 11 February 2017 Downloaded by [ University of California , San Diego ] at 21 : 12 11 February 2017. 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. K. Fukuda, “Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 220, no. July 2019, p. 107460, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. K. Nagy, E. Hajrizi, and L. Palkovics, “Responsible Innovation in Support of Society 5.0 - Aspects of Audit and Control,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 17469–17474, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. A. M. Elleman and E. L. Oslund, “Reading Comprehension Research: Implications for Practice and Policy,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2372732218816339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. L. A. Anggrasari, “Penerapan e-learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi digital di era new normal,” Prem. Educ. J. Pendidik. Dasar dan Pembelajaran, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 248, 2020, doi: 10.25273/pe.v10i2.7493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. L. Ellitan, “Competing in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0,” J. Maksipreneur Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrep., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1, 2020, doi: 10.30588/jmp.v10i1.657. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. X. Hu, F. K. S. Leung, and G. Chen, “School, family, and student factors behind student attitudes towards science: The case of Hong Kong fourth-graders,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 92, no. July, pp. 135–144, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. M. Sholikah, Yufiarti, and E. Yetti, “Early childhood literacy skills: The effect of socioeconomic status, home literacy environment, and social skills,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3769–3775, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijitee.A4807.119119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. C. Meng, “Parent–child interactions longitudinally mediate the association between shared literacy activities and emergent literacy and oral language skills,” Read. Writ., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1593–1612, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11145-021-10130-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. S. Z. Zhang, T. Inoue, H. Shu, and G. K. Georgiou, “How does home literacy environment influence reading comprehension in Chinese? Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study,” Read. Writ., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1745–1767, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11145-019-09991-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. C. Lucas, P. Hood, and D. Coyle, “Blossoming in English: Preschool Children’s Emergent Literacy Skills in English,” J. Res. Child. Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 477–502, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02568543.2020.1742256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. S. Brink and C. Nel, “Contradictions within an activity of second language reading literacy,” South African J. Child. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.4102/sajce.v9i1.687. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. M. K. Rand and L. M. Morrow, “The Contribution of Play Experiences in Early Literacy: Expanding the Science of Reading,” Read. Res. Q., vol. 56, no. S1, pp. S239–S248, 2021, doi: 10.1002/rrq.383. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. S. Tatalović Vorkapić and V. Katić, “Literacy-related school readiness through play in Croatia,” Int. J. Early Years Educ., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 277–294, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09669760.2020.1803046. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. B. D. Roe, S. H.Smith, and N. Kolodziej, Teaching Reading ın Today’s Elementary Schools. 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. J. Doležalová, “Competencies of Teachers and Student Teachers for the Development of Reading Literacy,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 171, pp. 519–525, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Y. Shen and S. N. Del Tufo, “Parent-child shared book reading mediates the impact of socioeconomic status on heritage language learners’ emergent literacy,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 59, pp. 254–264, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.12.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. J. P. Pezoa, S. Mendive, and K. Strasser, “Reading interest and family literacy practices from prekindergarten to kindergarten: Contributions from a cross-lagged analysis,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 47, pp. 284–295, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.12.014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. S. Hidayatullah, Y. Mulyati, V. S. Damaianti, and T. Permadi, “Effectiveness of Dialogical Reading Literacy Programs in Improving Language Skills and Literacy of Early Students,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 233–252, 2023, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.22.8.13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. I. Nurmahanani, “Effectiveness of a Mixed Methods-Based Literacy Program in Improving Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Mastery, and Reading Fluency Skills of Early Grade Students,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 324–343, 2023, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.22.7.17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. M. Torppa, K. Vasalampi, K. Eklund, and P. Niemi, “Long-term effects of the home literacy environment on reading development: Familial risk for dyslexia as a moderator,” J. Exp. Child Psychol., vol. 215, p. 105314, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. J. P. Guevara et al., “Effects of Early Literacy Promotion on Child Language Development and Home Reading Environment: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” J. Pediatr. X, vol. 2, p. 100020, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. G. Yeomans-Maldonado and C. Mesa, “The association of the home literacy environment and parental reading beliefs with oral language growth trajectories of Spanish-English bilingual children,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 57, pp. 271–284, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.07.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. M. Romero-González, R. Lavigne-Cerván, M. S. M. de León, S. Gamboa-Ternero, R. J. R. de Mier, and J. F. Romero-Pérez, “Effects of a home literacy environment program on psychlinguistic variables in children from 6 to 8 years of age,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063085. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. C. Mesa et al., “The effects of reading and language intervention on literacy skills in children in a remote community: An exploratory randomized controlled trial,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 100, no. November 2019, p. 101535, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101535. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. N. L. Alston-Abel and V. W. Berninger, “Relationships Between Home Literacy Practices and School Achievement: Implications for Consultation and Home–School Collaboration,” J. Educ. Psychol. Consult., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 164–189, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10474412.2017.1323222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. F. Guzmán-Simón, J. Gil-Flores, and A. Pacheco-Costa, “Home literacy environment and reading comprehension in Spanish primary education,” J. Res. Read., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 229–247, 2020, doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. T. Ruecker, “Digital divides in access and use in literacy instruction in rural high schools,” Comput. Compos., vol. 64, p. 102709, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102709. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. J. Li, A. Brar, and N. Roihan, “The use of digital technology to enhance language and literacy skills for Indigenous people: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 2, no. April, p. 100035, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100035. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. H. Wibawanto and Roemintoyo, “The learning method of society 5.0 during new normal in Indonesia: Case Study: Vocational Highschool in Surakarta, Indonesia,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 0–5, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3452144.3452196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. A. Nugraha and F. Aminur Rahman, “Android Application Development of Student Learning Skills in Era Society 5.0,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1779, no. 1, pp. 0–9, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1779/1/012014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. I. F. Rachmat, S. Hartati, and Erdawati, “Family cohesion, interpersonal communication, and smartphone addiction: Does it affect children’s emotional dysregulation?,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 279–291, 2021, doi: 10.21831/cp.v40i2.34214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. F. R. Vellutino, W. E. Tunmer, J. J. Jaccard, and R. Chen, “Components of Reading Ability: Multivariate Evidence for a Convergent Skills Model of Reading Development,” Sci. Stud. Read., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3–32, 2007, doi: 10.1080/10888430709336632. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. D. Barton, Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. A. D. Friederici, Language in Our Brain: The Origins of a Uniquely Human Capacity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. E. Maharsi et al., “Pendampingan Literasi Dasar Tahap Pengembangan di SD Kristen YBPK Kota Malang,” J. ABDIMAS, vol. 6, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.26905/abdimas.v6i1.5007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. P. Wiedarti and K. Laksono, Desain Induk Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi, Dimensi, Elemen, dan Sub-elemen Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jakarta: Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Department of Education and Training, Victoria State Government, “Literacy Teaching Toolkit: Guided Reading,” 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. J. W. Creswell, “Reflections on the MMIRA The Future of Mixed Methods Task Force Report,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 215–219, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1558689816650298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. D. J. Weigel, S. S. Martin, and K. K. Bennett, “Contributions of the home literacy environment to preschool-aged children’s emerging literacy and language skills,” Early Child Dev. Care, vol. 176, no. 3–4, pp. 357–378, 2006, doi: 10.1080/0300443042000313500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. S. D. Nirmala, “Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas IV Se-Gugus 2 Purwasari dalam Membaca Pemahaman melalui Model FIVES dan Model Guided Reading,” J. Din. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 44–58, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. R. Griffith, Teachers as Decision Makers: Responsive Guided Reading Instruction. Routledge, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. T. Pressley, R. L. Allington, and M. Pressley, Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching. Guilford Publications, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. S. Litina and Z. Rubene, “The effect of digital school culture on science education and scientific literacy: A scoping review,” J. Educ. Cult. Soc., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles