Fluency, Accuracy, Lexical Density and Complexity as a Quantitative Study to Analyze the Palestinian University Students’ Writing Capacity

This study aimed to assess the writing competence at the university level in Palestine. Sixty-five essays of Palestinian university students were addressed concerning lexical density, complexity, accuracy and fluency. The descriptive statistical tools, especially means, standard deviations, and Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient were used. Consequently, the study concluded that the students were short of some basic rules of accuracy, fluency, complexity, and lexical density. However, the correlation between complexity and fluency was significant. On the other hand, the relationship between accuracy and fluency was insignificant. The results showed that the writing skill at university level was unsatisfying. Thus, the researcher recommended improving complexity through having more activities, through reading longer reading, Facebook entries, and tweets, fiction, and general prose. In addition, lexical density can be promoted through encouraging the students to read Wikipedia, news articles; accuracy through in class and home practice and fluency through power writing. Ministry of Education and universities should prioritize witting as a must.

Writing capacity, lexical density, complexity, fluency

1. Ahmedi, A. & Meihami, H. (2017). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in ESL learners’’ writing: A dynamic systems theory. XLinguae Journal, 3/10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ariana, S. M. (2010). Some thoughts on writing skills. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1 (1), 127-133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baleghizadel, S. & Gordani, Y. (2012). Academic Writing and Grammatical Accuracy: The Role of Corrective Feedback. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 6, 159- 176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cahyono, B. Y., Mukminatien, N. & Amrina, R. (2016). Indonesian students’ writing proficiency and their ability in using complex sentences. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 4/ 9, 22-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL quarterly, 25 / 3, 459-480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chappell, V. (2011). What makes writing so important? Retrieved December 27, 2012, from http://www.marquette.edu/wac/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Didau, D. (2013), Black space: improving writing by increasing lexical density. Retrieved from https://learningspy.co.uk/writing/black-space-increasing-lexical-density. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fareed, M., Ashraf, A. & Bilal, M. (2016) . ESL learners' writing skills: problems, factors and suggestions. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 4/2, 81-92. DOI: 10.20547/jess0421604201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2003) . Writing instruction for struggling adolescent readers: a gradual release model. Journal of Adolescent & adult Literacy 46 / 5, 398 -405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Foster, P., Tonkyn A., & Wigglesworth G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 354–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ha, S. H. (2019). Lexical richness in EFL undergraduate students’ academic writing. English Teaching, 74/ 3.DOI: 10.15858/engtea.74.3.20190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hunt, K., W. (1970). Do Sentences in the Second Language Grow Like Those in the First? TESOL Quarterly, 4/3, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. IELTS, (2015). IELTS Writing- How To Write a Complex Sentence. Retrieved from https://www.ieltsadvantage.com/2015/03/27/ielts-writing-complex-sentence/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Johnson, V. (2008), Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: a developmental perspective, Working Papers 53, 61-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kim, Y., Nam, S. & Lee, S. Y. (2016). Correlation of proficiency with complexity, accuracy, and fluency in spoken and written production: evidence from L2 Korean. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 19, 147-181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Klimova, B. F. (2013). The importance of writing. PARIPEX-INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2/ 1, 9-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lambert, C. & Kormos J. (2014). Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Task-Based L2 Research: Toward More Developmentally Based Measures of Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 35 / 5, 607-614. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amu047. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). “ Completely Different Worlds”: EAP and the Writing Experiences of ESL Students in University Courses. TESOL quarterly, 31 / 1, 39-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Maley, A. (2009). ELF: a teacher's perspective. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9:3, 187-200, DOI: 10.1080/14708470902748848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mylläri, T. (2020). Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure? Journal of the European Second Language Association, 4 / 1, 13–23. DOI: http://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nishimara, Y., Kawaguchi, Y. & Abe, D. (2018). The relationship between complexity and fluency in L2 writing: An approach using network analysis. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330182241_The_relationship_betweencomplexity_and_fluency_in_L2_writing_An_approach_using_network_analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24/ 4, 492-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Plakans, L., Gebril, A., & Bilki, Z. (2016). Shaping a score: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in integrated writing performances. SAGE Journals,36 (2), 161- 179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216669537. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rayan, A. P. ( 2018). Complexity vs. simplicity: English should not be taught like any other subject but as a life skill. Retrieved from https://www.edexlive.com/opinion/2018/oct/03/complexity-vs-simplicity-4056.html Language. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sato, R. (2008). The relationship between fluency and accuracy in writing. ARELE, 19, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.20581/arele.19.0_71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Shreiner, E. How to Improve Writing Fluency. Retrieved from https://www.theclassroom.com/fifth-grade-writing-fluency-activities-38232.html. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Skehan, P. (2009). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30/4, 510-532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shona, M. (2019). How long is an essay? Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/length/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sayarif, H. & Putri, R. E. (2018). How lexical density reveals students’ ability in writing academic text. Lingua Didaktika,12 / 2, 86 -94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tarone, E. Downing, B., Cohen, A., Gillette, S., Murie, R. & Dailey, B. (1993). The writing of southeast Asian-American students in secondary school and university. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2/2, 149-172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tsang, W.K., & Wong, M. (2000). Giving grammar the place it deserves in process writing. Prospect, 15, 34-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ure, J. (1971), Lexical density and register differentiation. In G. Perren and J.L.M. Trim (eds), Applications of Linguistics (pp.443 – 452). London: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Walsh, K. (2010). The importance of writing skills: Online tools to encourage success. |Retrieved December 27, 2012, from http://www.emergingedtech. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wang, S. & Slater, T. (2016). Syntactic complexity of EFL Chinese students’ Writing. English Language and Literature Studies, 6 /1, 81-86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wigglesworth, G. – Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26/3, 445-466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Technical report No. 1. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Reading Engagement, Reading Anxiety, and Self-Perceived Reading Success among Malaysian ESL Foundation Students: A Descriptive Study
• Teachers’ Perceptions of AI-Assisted Digital Storytelling in Malaysian Lower Secondary ESL Classrooms
• A Speech Act Analysis of Governor Nyesom Wike’s 2015 Inaugural Address
• English Teaching Methods and Pupils’ Performance in Nangako Town Council, Uganda
• Using Gamified Activity-Based Learning to Transform Classroom Dynamics from Pedagogy to Heutagogy