Technical, Economic, Social, and Environmental Dimensions in Biogas Energy Development

Biogas energy has emerged as a sustainable, renewable energy source that can help tackle global issues like energy security, climate change, waste management, and the development of a circular economy. It is produced through the anaerobic digestion of organic materials such as agricultural leftovers, livestock manure, municipal solid waste, food waste, and wastewater sludge. Biogas presents significant opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while generating renewable electricity, heat, and biomethane. Despite gaining more attention from researchers, the existing studies are often fragmented. They usually focus on individual technical, economic, environmental, or social aspects without properly looking at how these areas are connected. This study carries aims to bring together current knowledge on biogas energy development and to clarify the factors that influence its successful implementation. The study integrates peer-reviewed studies published from 2015 to 2026, gathered from major scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles. The selected literature is analyzed using a structured systematic review method to pinpoint key research themes, drivers for implementation, technological innovations, barriers, and outcomes related to sustainability in biogas energy systems. The findings categorize the main factors affecting biogas development into five major areas: availability of feedstock, anaerobic digestion technology, recovery and use of resources, policy and financial support, and applications of end-use energy. Additionally, the review assesses the numerous benefits and barriers from technical, economic, environmental, and social viewpoints, emphasizing their connected relationships within sustainable energy systems. The study adds to the growing literature on renewable energy by putting forward a combined conceptual framework that illustrates the interactions among these four sustainability dimensions in biogas energy development. The framework shows how technological improvements boost environmental performance, economic feasibility, and social acceptance while also recognizing the challenges tied to investment costs, operational complexity, policy uncertainty, and engagement with stakeholders. Lastly, the review points out new research directions and offers practical advice for policymakers, researchers, industry professionals, and investors who want to speed up the adoption of biogas technologies and aid the global shift toward a low-carbon circular economy.

Circular economy; Biogas energy; Anaerobic digestion; Renewable energy; Circular economy; Sustainability

1. Abanades, S., Abbaspour, H., Ahmadi, A., Das, B., Ehyaei, M. A., Esmaeilion, F., El Haj Assad, M., Hajilounezhad, T., Jamali, D. H., Hmida, A. (2022). A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(4), 3377–3400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Seadi, T., Rutz, D., Prassl, H., Köttner, M., Finsterwalder, T., Volk, S., & Janssen, R. (2018). Biogas handbook: Science, production and applications. Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alengebawy, A., El-Sayed, A., Abdelkhalek, A., El-Hallous, E. I. (2024). Sustainable biogas production via anaerobic digestion: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J., & Dewil, R. (2011). Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 37(6), 755–781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Batstone, D. J., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kalyuzhnyi, S. V., Pavlostathis, S. G., Rozzi, A., Sanders, W. T. M., Siegrist, H., & Vavilin, V. A. (2002). Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1). IWA Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Behzadian, K., Rahimian, M., & others. (2023). Sustainability assessment of biogas systems: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184, 113574. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bond, T., & Templeton, M. R. (2011). History and future of domestic biogas plants in developing countries. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(4), 347–354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. European Biogas Association. (2023). EBA statistical report 2023. European Biogas Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2019). The State of Food and Agriculture 2019: Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Holm-Nielsen, J. B., Al Seadi, T., & Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. (2009). The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technology, 100(22), 5478–5484. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. International Energy Agency. (2023). Renewables 2023. IEA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. International Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. International Renewable Energy Agency. (2022). World Energy Transitions Outlook 2022. IRENA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Khalid, A., Arshad, M., Anjum, M., Mahmood, T., & Dawson, L. (2011). The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Management, 31(8), 1737–1744. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kumar, M., Kumar, V., & others. (2020). Recent advances in pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic biomass in anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 303, 122892. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lam, M. K., Lee, K. T., & others. (2020). Sustainable utilization of palm oil mill effluent for biogas production: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120902. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Logan, M., Visvanathan, C., & others. (2023). Recent advances in anaerobic digestion technologies for sustainable biogas production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 180, 113301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mao, C., Feng, Y., Wang, X., & Ren, G. (2015). Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., Romero-Güiza, M. S., Fonoll, X., Peces, M., & Astals, S. (2014). A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Bioresource Technology, 160, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Möller, K., & Müller, T. (2012). Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop response: A review. Engineering in Life Sciences, 12(3), 242–257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J. F., & Fahl, F. (2018). Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe. Renewable Energy, 129, 457–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Shah, S. M. A., Khan, M. Z., Ahmad, M., & others. (2024). Biogas technology for sustainable energy transition: Recent developments and future opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683–2691. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study