Toward a Contextual Reconciliation Framework for Muslim Counsellors Working with LGBTQ+ Clients

Authors

Wan Alif Haikal Wan Hazuki

Department of Guidance and Counseling, Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University (Malaysia)

Mohammad Aziz Shah Mohamed Arip

Department of Guidance and Counseling, Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700049

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 658-662

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-11

Accepted: 2026-07-16

Published: 2026-07-23

Abstract

This conceptual paper offers a contextual reconciliation framework as a means to better contextualise the patterns and implications of how Muslim counsellors navigate their work with LGBTQ+ clients in religiously and culturally conservative contexts. Utilising an extracted literature dataset of 17 published records from 2013 to 2025, the manuscript reconceptualises a narrow question regarding personal value conflict into one where contextual factors shape an appraisal process, cue a responsive counselling practice, and yield significant consequences. Conceptualisations of structural stigma positioning counsellors for tension between affirmative professional expectations and remaining true to religious or moral commitments, and presenting with competence gaps, weak reference models of practice, limited training opportunities, and inconsistent degrees of institutional support. Practitioners seem to resort to information seeking, value balancing, selective prioritisation, boundary management, and culturally grounded sense making. This framework integrates these insights by structuring them into four interrelated domains: contextual pressures, internal counsellor processes, reconciliation strategies, and practice outcomes. According to the paper, ethical strain is influenced not only by personal beliefs but also by the structures of supervision, educational preparation, culturally safe systems, and broader sociocultural contexts. Finally, five propositions are put forward to inform future theory building and empirical research, with implications noted for counsellor education, supervision, referral practice, institutional policy, and future context-sensitive models of counselling and mental health across a range of Muslim and other religiously conservative contexts.

Keywords

Muslim Counsellors; LGBTQ+ Clients; Value Conflict; Counselling Ethics; Culturally Safe Care.

Downloads

References

1. Abas, M. K. J., Saper, M. N., & Mohd Daud, N. A. (2025). Pembinaan rapport berasaskan tazkiyah al-nafs oleh guru bimbingan dan kaunseling di Malaysia. *Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH)*, 10(6), e003426. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v10i6.3426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Da’as, R., & Slobodin, O. (2025). “God did not create us this way”: An investigation into the experiences of school counselors working with Arab-Muslim LGBTQ youth. *Journal of Homosexuality*, 72(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2321239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Elzamzamy, K., & Keshavarzi, H. (2019). Navigating ethical dilemmas in mental health practice between professional ethics and Islamic values. *Journal of Islamic Faith and Practice*, 2(1), 40–71. https://doi.org/10.18060/23274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gany, M. Y. D., & Subhi, N. (2018). Religious and sexual identity conflict among same-sex attracted Muslim men: A conceptual difference of life experience between Western and Muslim majority countries. *Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia*. (pp. 133-149) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ho, S. H., Shamsudin, A. H., Liow, J. W., Juhari, J. A., Ling, S. A., & Tan, K. (2024). Mental healthcare needs and experiences of LGBT+ individuals in Malaysia: Utility, enablers, and barriers. *Healthcare, 12*(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12100998 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Jamal, S. H., Amat, S., Subhi, N., & Ghazali, M. F. M. (2018). Obstacles and challenges in counselling gays and lesbians in Malaysia. *International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8*(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/V8-I6/4293 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jamal, S. H., Subhi, N., & Amat, S. (2020). Kompetensi kesungguhan dan nilai kaunselor dalam mengendali kaunseling gay dan lesbian (Counsellor’s diligence and value competencies in managing gay and lesbian counselling). *Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 34*(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mahmood, S. R. S., & Abdallah, S. S. (2020). Value conflicts in counseling Muslim LGBT clients: Muslim counsellors’ experiences. In *Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research* (pp. 143–149). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200814.032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Minty, S. (2025a). Queer Muslim solidarity: Working against binaries. *Contemporary Islam*. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-024-00515-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Minty, S. (2025b). This type of Muslim. *Studies in Gender and Sexuality*. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2025.2532261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Moffic, H. S. (2019). Islamophobia and ethical challenges for LGBT mental healthcare. In H. S. Moffic, J. Peteet, A. Hankir, & R. Awaad (Eds.), *Islamophobia and psychiatry* (pp. 309–317). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00512-2_23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Okrey Anderson, S., & McGuire, J. K. (2019). Personal faith and professional ethics: Best practice with the families of sexual and gender minority youths. *Social Work, 64*(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swz030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Subhi, N., Mohamad, M. S., & Hamid, L. (2013). Potensi konflik di antara pegangan Islam dan identiti seksual: Simptom psikologikal dalam kalangan mak nyah. *Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 27*(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Vaughan, M., Ergun, G., & Williams, J. (2021). This being is a guest house: Embracing humility, liberation & strengths in therapy with sexual and gender diverse Muslims. *Journal of Homosexuality, 68*(7), 1196–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2021.1888587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. M. K. (2025). The third space in therapy: Queer Muslim clinicians and the politics of co-created belonging. *Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 26*(3), 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2025.2532257 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Vu, M. H., Pang, N. T. P., Ho, S. H., & Shamsudin, A. H. (2022). Cultural safety for LGBTQIA+ people: A narrative review and implications for health care in Malaysia. *Sexes, 3*(3), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.3390/sexes3030029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ligoyligoy, J. M., Jabalde Jr., E. R., Reganit, J. J., Dinopol, G. P., Mainit, M. J. V., & Spadilla, M. A. (2025). Reconciling faith and identity: An ethnomethodological examination of LGBTQIA+ Muslims utilizing intersectional reconciliation theory. *Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 3*(4), 1718–1735. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15342760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles