Rhetorical Appeals and Leadership Style in Trump’s Inaugural Speeches
Authors
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Segamat, Johor (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Segamat, Johor (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Segamat, Johor (Malaysia)
Atos Services (M) Sdn Bhd, Cyberjaya, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Segamat, Johor (Malaysia)
Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Dengkil, Selangor (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Segamat, Johor (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Segamat, Johor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100010
Subject Category: Political Science
Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 93-98
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-27
Accepted: 2026-07-08
Published: 2026-07-24
Abstract
The current president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, has garnered interest in the political discourse mainly for his controversial rhetorical figures of speech. Hence, this study aims to provide a rhetorical assessment of Trump's political communication during his inauguration by employing Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. Aristotle's rhetorical framework offers a helpful analytical foundation for analysing how Trump uses his inauguration speeches to create political legitimacy, rally popular support, and ideological narratives. The findings reveal that inaugural speeches from his first term (2017) and second term (2025) invoked a nationalist sentiment, which contributed to his presidential election. Besides that, his rhetoric reflected themes associated with populist leadership. His leadership style was also examined to provide insight into his ideology and persuasive skills. The findings offer insight and contribute to the body of populist political discourse and rhetorical leadership.
Keywords
Rhetorical Strategies, Populist, Political Discourse
Downloads
References
1. Aristotle. (2007). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans., 2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 4th century BCE) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Brubaker, R. (2021). Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic. Thesis Eleven, 164(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513620970804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chadha, K., & Verma, H. V. (2023). Purpose, semiotics and rhetoric: A study of select brands. Journal of Business Thought, 14, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbt/2023/33187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ghasemi, F. (2020). Persuasive language in presidential speeches: A contrastive study based on Aristotelian rhetoric. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, 12, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.5750/bjll.v12i.1872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Moffitt, B. (2022). Populism and the pandemic: How populists respond to crisis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1813962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Susilowati, M., & Ulkhasanah, W. (2021). Ideology and power in presidential speech. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Trump, D. J. (2017, January 20). Inaugural address. In G. Peters & J. T. Woolley (Eds.), The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/320188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Trump, D. J. (2025, January 20). Inaugural address. In G. Peters & J. T. Woolley (Eds.), The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/375939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Waluyo, G. H., Failasofah, F., & Sartika, D. (2025). Ideology and power in presidential speech: A critical analysis of Jokowi’s international speeches. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 4(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22437/kalistra.v4i1.38479 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Wood, B. D. (2007). The politics of economic leadership: The causes and consequences of presidential rhetoric. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Yousfi, A., & Mouhadjer, N. (2024). A critical discourse analysis of the inaugural speech of Trump and its perception by the American society. Journal of Science and Knowledge Horizons, 4(1), 470–493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Global Political Economy and Educational Reforms in the Global South: An Evolutionary Study of Ghana
- Electoral Militarization and the Challenges of Free and Fair Elections in Nigeria: A Focus on the 2023 Presidential Election
- Political Awareness and Engagement in Relation to Voting Behavior among College Students
- Role of Community Leaders in Ensuring Secure Electoral Process in Nairobi City County, Kenya
- Assessing the Delivery of Local Disaster Management Services and Client Satisfaction through SERVQUAL Dimensions