Teacher Leadership Practices and Challenges of Master Teachers in Curriculum and Planning

This study explored the teacher leadership practices and challenges of master teachers in curriculum and planning in the Schools Division of Panabo City, Davao Region. At the heart of the research were the questions: What are the leadership practices of Master Teachers in shaping curriculum and guiding instructional planning, and what challenges do they face along the way? Grounded in Transformational Leadership Theory and the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) Domain 4, the study drew insights from 15 master teachers through interviews and thematic analysis. The teacher leadership practices of master teachers in the schools Division of Panabo City in curriculum and planning highlights five major themes: structured curriculum leadership through planning, monitoring, and alignment; instructional leadership through coaching, mentoring, and developmental support; responsive leadership through learner-centered and contextualized curriculum adaptation; collaborative leadership through LAC, PLC, and professional learning communities; and innovative leadership through ICT integration and resourcefulness. While, the teacher leadership challenges of master teachers highlight five major themes: workload and structural constraints on teacher leadership; gaps in curriculum understanding, alignment, and standards interpretation; resistance to change, evaluator perceptions, and weak collaborative engagement; limited readiness for responsiveness, differentiation, and learner-centered teaching; and ICT, resource, and communication barriers. The findings painted a vivid picture of leadership in action. Master teachers were seen mentoring colleagues, aligning curriculum with standards, facilitating collaborative planning, and experimenting with ICT integration to enrich instruction. Yet, their leadership journey was not without obstacles. Heavy workloads, unclear role boundaries, limited authority in decision-making, and gaps in institutional support often made their leadership efforts difficult to sustain. Resource shortages and resistance to change further complicated their work, revealing the tension between expectations and realities in schools. Despite these challenges, the study highlighted the resilience and commitment of master teachers. Their practices showed that teacher leadership is not just about authority but about influence, collaboration, and the drive to improve learning experiences. The study concludes that for master teachers to thrive as curriculum leaders, schools must provide clearer structures, stronger support systems, and leadership-focused professional development. Policy recommendations call for reducing workload overlap, strengthening mentoring frameworks, and investing in ICT resources to empower master teachers in their dual role as educators and leaders.

Master Teachers, Teacher Leadership, Curriculum, Planning, Mentoring, DepEd Policy, Panabo City Division

1. Ali, Z. B. M., Yamat, H., & Wahi, W. (2020). Understanding teachers’ anxiety towards the coaching programme. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43ns2a2235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Altun, S., & Yucel-Toy, B. (2023). Transformation of teachers through a collaborative-reflective training model: A case study on school-based professional development. South African Journal of Education, 43. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43ns2a2235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance. New York, NY: Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Belbestre, S. M. M., & Chieng, M. L. P. (2024). Looking into the Instructional Leadership of Master Teachers During the In-Person Classes: A Phenomenology. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16704 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blank, R. (2021). New research on teacher leadership in schools: Efficacy of a survey method for analyzing multiple dimensions of leadership. Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership, 5. https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper and Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baldera, P. R. (2025). Instructional leadership in practice: A qualitative exploration of public elementary master teachers’ identity formation and influence in the Philippines. Education Policy and Innovation Journal, 18(1), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.18.482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cabilla, M. S. (2025). Teachers’ involvement in school decision-making: Musings of teachers in the secondary school. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016: Policy Guidelines on Daily Lesson Preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education. (2017). Philippine professional standards for teachers (PPST). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Domínguez-Castillo, J. G., Cisneros-Cohernour, E. J., & Vega-Cauich, J. I. (2024). Elements, contexts, and attributes of teacher leadership identified by college professors in southeastern Mexico. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 12(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.14591 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Garcia, J. A. S., et al. (2024). Systematic review of professional development programs for teachers in the Philippines. EDCOM II Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. Sage Journal, 1(1), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hare, K. C. C. (2024). Level of practice of master teachers as instructional leaders. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 6(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Harris, A. (2013). Distributed Leadership: Friend or Foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving Schools Through Teacher Leadership. Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hu, G., & Endozo, A. (2024). Exploring the role of communities of practice in enhancing professional development of physical education teachers. International Journal of Education and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.54097/83bbbv95 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Indrawati, D., Habibie, R. K., Budiyono, & Zuhdi, U. (2024). Barriers and enablers to implementing differentiated mathematics instruction. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v7i4.11993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Indrayani, S., Sinaga, R., Rahman, B., Hariri, H., Riswandi, R., & Handoko, H. (2024). Digital instructional leadership and distributed leadership in optimizing teacher performance. PPSDP International Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v3i2.359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kamaruzaman, N. L., Musa, K., & Hashim, Z. (2020). Issues and challenges in teacher leadership. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(10), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i10.517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kasapoğlu, H., & Karaca, B. (2021). Teachers’ views on teacher leadership: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(6), 66–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Helping Teachers Develop as Leaders. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2019). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(2), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven Strong Claims About Successful School Leadership Revisited. School Leadership & Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Limosnero, A. H. (2025). Uncovering Instructional Leadership Practices of Master Teachers in Magsaysay North District. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lewis, K. D., & DeSantis, J. (2024). Exploring the role of instructional coaching in a shifting classroom technology landscape. Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership, 8(1), 1–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Llego, M. A. (2021). Teacher leadership and instructional improvement practices in Philippine schools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Magsino, R. (2020). Teacher leadership practices and professional learning communities in the Philippine education context. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Merable, M. L. S. (2024). Instructional Leadership Experiences of Master Teachers: A Qualitative Inquiry.Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2017). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mishra, M. K., Patil, S. S., & H. G., A. (2024). Exploring the influence mechanism of strategic leadership and knowledge management. Journal of Informatics Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i1.673 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Nguyen, D., Harris, A., & Ng, D. (2020). A review of the empirical research on teacher leadership (2003–2017): Evidence, patterns and implications. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(1), 60–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. OECD. (2024). TALIS 2024 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Palacio, H. G., & Digo, G. S. (2024). Development of handbook on instructional coaching and mentoring for master teachers. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 4(4), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V04I4Y2024-08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Pubcations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Phumsaidorn, R., & Julsuwan, S. (2024). Supervision model through coaching and mentoring for enhancing active learning instruction competency of elementary teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(5), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n5p34 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Porton, R. E. (2025). Teacher empowerment and leadership competence among teachers in Panabo City Division. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management, 12(8), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Resnick, D. B. (2015). What is ethics in research, and why is it important? https://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/research-ethics.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Saad, K. (2019). Peer coaching in Malaysia: Exploring the implementation of a professional learning communities programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Siregar, M. (2024). Analysis of the principal's position in the implementation of quality management in education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.29210/020243855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Supovitz, J. A., & Comstock, M. C. (2023). The impact of a formal teacher leadership program on student performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(74). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7524 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Suryawati, E., et al. (2024). Mentor, observe, support, take action (MOST): A model for teacher leadership development. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1352577. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Whitworth, B. A., Wilson, S., & Watson, S. (2021). Examining teacher leadership as a model for improvement in science education. School Science and Mathematics, 121(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Wiens, P. D., Metcalf, K., & Skousen, J. (2024). Understanding teacher leadership: A survey of the field. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 9(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2019). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 89(6), 1–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What Do We Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings from Two Decades of Scholarship. Review of Educational Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Yount, K. M., Cheong, Y. F., Maxwell, L., Heckert, J., Martinez, E. M., & Seymour, G. (2019). Measurement properties of the project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index. CGIAR: Agriculture for Nutrition and Health. https://bit.ly/3oF56mb [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Administrative Support as a Predictor of Teacher Retention and Organizational Commitment: A Case Study of Junior High Teachers
• No Place for Play-Ful Learning in Higher Education: An Interdisciplinary Critical Evaluation (2015–2025)
• Unmasking Colonial Legacies in Zambian Education: A Philosophical and Historical Critique of the Secondary School Curriculum
• Improving Students' Collaboration and Communication Skills through Project-Based Digital Learning in Plantation and Herbal
• Public Primary School Teacher Preparedness on CBC Adoption in Township Ward, Garissa County, Kenya