Exploring the Link Between Reading Difficulties and Reading Strategies

Reading is fundamental to language development, yet many ESL and EFL learners continue to encounter significant comprehension difficulties. These challenges are often linked to limited vocabulary, weak decoding skills, and insufficient strategic awareness. Reading strategies, particularly cognitive and metacognitive techniques, are essential in supporting comprehension and improving performance. This study investigates whether significant relationships exist between reading difficulties and reading strategies across demographic variables, including gender, age, and reading preferences. It also examines learners’ perceptions of their reading difficulties as well as their use of reading strategies. The study explores the overall relationship between reading difficulties and reading strategies. The research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how individual differences and perceptions influence the interplay between reading challenges and strategic reading behaviours. To achieve the objective of the research, a 5 Likert-scale survey based on reading difficulties (Abeeleh and Al-Sobh, 2021) and online reading strategies proposed by Amer et al (2010) is utilised. This survey focuses on reading difficulties, global reading strategies, problem-solving reading strategies and support reading strategies. The survey obtained responses from 130 participants. Findings of the research suggested that, relating to reading difficulties, it is pertaining to the students’ perception that made them feel that reading academic texts is a difficult task. Looking at the global strategies and problem-solving strategies, these learners have the tendency to refocus their attention, so that they are able to obtain better comprehension of the academic texts. In relation to supporting reading strategies, the learners depended on their translation abilities, as well as referred to other materials to gain more understanding. Several pedagogical implications are also addressed in the present study.

Reading Strategies, Online Reading Strategies, Quantitative Research, Academic Text

1. Abeeleh,T.W.A. and Al-Sobh,M. (2021) Reading Comprehension Problems Encountered by EFL Students at Aljoun National University. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, Vol 8(1), pp6-15. Retrieved from https://ijllnet.com/journals/Vol_8_No_1_March_2021/2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024) Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahsani, N., & Budairi, A. (2022). A review on L2 models of reading theories and reading teaching strategy. International Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1), 13-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v4i1.474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amer,A., AL Barwani,T., Ibrahim, M. (2010) Student Teachers’ Perceived Use of Online Reading Strategies. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), Vol 6(4), pp 102-113. Retrieved from httpe://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Rahmat,N.H., Arepin,M., & Sulaiman,S. (2020) The Cycle of Reading Fear among Undergraduates. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 16(3), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.9730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Shah, M. A. (2024). Meaning and Statistical Analysis of T-Tests in SPSS. Journal of Saidu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Medical College, 14(1), 64-65. https://doi.org/10.522006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ammar, A., Md Sallehuddin, N. H., Amat Suparia, F. A., Mohammed, M. S., Rahman, N. A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2026). Investigation on relationship between reading difficulties and online reading strategies. Asian People Journal, 9(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2026.9.1.791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ceyhan, S., & Yıldız, M. (2021). The Effect of Interactive Reading Aloud on Student Reading Comprehension, Reading Motivation and Reading Fluency. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4) Retrieved from https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Delgado, P., Salmerón, L., & Altamura, L. (2021). Strategic awareness and reading behaviors in digital environments: Navigating online text complexities. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 512–530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Diehl, W. (Ed.), Caverly, D., Shanklin, N. L., & Anglin, C. L. (Eds.). (1978). Secondary reading: Theory and application. The Lilly Conference on Secondary Reading (April 6-8, 1978). Monographs in Teaching and Learning Number 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fatima, S., Azmuddin, R. A., & Kassim, A. (2026). A Comprehensive Review of Reading Challenges and Instructional Solutions for Saudi EFL Learners. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v16i112260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and researching reading (4th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Habók, A., Magyar, A., & Molnár, G. (2024). The effect of reading strategy use on online reading comprehension achievement. Heliyon, 10(5), e26663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26663 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Johnson, A. M., Tighe, E. L., Jacovina, M. E., Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2017a). Development of an interactive narrative for adult literacy learners. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series (pp. 238–262). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2639-1.ch012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Li, H., Gan, Z., Leung, S. O., & An, Z. (2022). The impact of reading strategy instruction on reading comprehension, strategy use, motivation, and self-efficacy in Chinese university EFL students. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221086659 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lin, H., Wei, W., Zou, B., & Zheng, Y. (2026). Interactive reading patterns and metacognitive strategies from surface to deep levels of L2 learners in GenAI-assisted critical reading. Discover Computing, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-026-10069-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nanda, D. W., & Azmy, K. (2020). Poor reading comprehension issue in EFL classroom among Indonesian secondary school students: Scrutinizing the causes, impacts and possible solutions. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 8(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v8i1.6771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pahrizal, N., Vintoni, A., Sotlikova, R., & Ya'akub, H. Z. H. (2024). Metacognitive reading strategies and their impact on comprehension: Insights from rural EFL learners. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 7(1), 18–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Phichiensathien, P. (2021). Interactive reading to second language reading ability. Proceedings of the 6th UPI International Conference on TVET 2020 (TVET 2020), 303–308. Atlantis Press. doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 573–603). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Singh, J. K. S., Kaur, G., & Sidhu, G. K. (2023). Strategic reading profile of ESL learners: Support strategies versus higher-level reading operations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. UNESCO. (2022). International literacy day report: Navigating post-pandemic literacy learning gaps. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Vanguri, R., Murathoti, R. N. B., Farooq, M. A. A., & Kumari, R. (2025). Exploring reading difficulties, interest, and support systems in English text among government secondary school students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101910 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study