Reframing Academic Writing with Chatgpt: A Self-Determination Theory Approach

The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT is changing the nature of academic writing by providing support in generating ideas, developing content, revision and editing. Although writing with AI offers benefits, little is known about its impact on learners’ writing strategies and motivation. Guided by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study examines the relationship between competence, autonomy, and relatedness in academic writing in the context of ChatGPT usage. This quantitative study involved 126 respondents from higher educational institutions. A 43-item Likert-scale questionnaire adapted from Raoofi et al. (2017) and Youssef et al. (2024) was used to collect data. The questionnaire was based on three constructs: autonomy, relatedness, and competence and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .937). Data were analysed using descriptive, inferential, and correlation analyses in SPSS. Results show positive perceptions of using ChatGPT in improving academic achievement, critical thinking skills, and the motivation of students. Moreover, participants used metacognitive, cognitive, and effort-regulating writing strategies frequently. ChatGPT is a potential scaffold for supporting learners’ writing development, but it also motivates them by increasing their competence, autonomy, and relatedness.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), ChatGPT, Academic Writing, Writing Strategies, Motivation

1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S. A. (2024). Reliability analysis: Application of Cronbach’s alpha in research instruments. SIG: e-Learning@CS, 114–119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bhat, A. K. (2025). The evolution of AI: From foundations to future prospects. https://www.computer.org/publications/tech-news/research/evolution-of-ai [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Ben Saad, H. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence-generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. He, L. (2024). The application of SPSS correlation analysis in the study of precision teaching of English in universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Khairuddin, Z., Rahmat, N. H., Noor, M. M., & Khairuddin, Z. (2021). The use of rhetorical strategies in argumentative essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(S3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2024). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, Article 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rahmat, N. H. (2021). An investigative study of cognitive and metacognitive paraphrasing strategies in ESL writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Raoofi, S. M., Miri, A., Gharibi, J., & Malaki, B. (2017). Assessing and validating a writing strategy scale for undergraduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 624–633. http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol08/03/23.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Stanford, J. (2025). How disruptive is AI in students’ academic writing in higher education? Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.b1d05ed3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Wang, C. (2024). Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English speakers. TechTrends, 30, 1825–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wang, J., Liao, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, D., Wang, N., Shu, J., & Wang, R. (2024). The impact of using ChatGPT on academic writing among medical undergraduates. Annals of Medicine, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2426760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yin, Y., & Li, C. (2024). Application and innovation of artificial intelligence in economics and management courses in universities. Journal of Service Science and Management, 17, 345–353. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2024.174017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey, A. E., Jennifer, M. D., Meghan, M. J., Thomas, E. K., & Marna, C. (2021). Impact of demographic survey questions on response rate and measurement: A randomized experiment. Survey Practice, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 482. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study