Green by Design: A Methodology for Digital Experience Carbon-Aware Enterprise Architecture (EA)

As a result of this rapid pace of digital enterprise transformation (powered by AI, distributed cloud, and customer-facing digital experience platforms), there is now a serious corporate sustainability paradox: energy use and Scope 3 carbon emissions. There are technical solutions for instance local Green AI, carbon-conscious resource management and automatic emission monitoring, but very fragmented, limited to departmental pockets of IT where there is no macro level business blueprint. That leaves business leaders constantly caught in the dilemma of introducing high level concepts of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) into digital systems.
To fill this execution gap, this study suggests a complete and socio-technical framework for Digital Experience Carbon-Aware Enterprise Architecture, called Green by Design. The framework is cantered on Design Science Research (DSR) paradigm and systematic themed analysis of the existing practices in the field of management information systems and combines the concepts of corporate governance, transparency of data, optimization of assets and perpetual life cycle verification into an actionable corporate strategy. The method is based on organizational paradigms (Industry 5.0 philosophy, Social Technological Systems Theory and Value Sensitive Design (VSD)), and on operational tools (Digital Twins and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enabled carbon accounting).
The results show that the multi-layered approach to embedding carbon accounting into enterprise architecture can cut data infrastructure carbon footprints by up to 56% and optimise capital expenditure and cloud asset allocation. Moreover, the use of intelligent carbon systems into data validated systems further improves the accuracy of corporate reporting and environmental reporting beyond 90%, mitigating the risk of legal compliance and helping to avoid “greenwashing” of brands. This is a blueprint for the C-suite, Chief Information Officers (CIOs) and sustainability directors to help their companies move forward on the technological side of the business to support sustainability and long-term value for their stakeholders.

Corporate Governance, Sustainable Enterprise Architecture, Digital Transformation, Carbon-Aware Management, Green Corporate AI, Industry 5.0, ESG Compliance.

1. Al-Hchaimi, A. A., Al-Shareeda, M. A., Azar, A. T., & El-Shafai, W. (2025). Reinforcement Guided Genetic Algorithm for Application Mapping in Network-on-Chip Architectures: Towards Transparent and Efficient MPSoC Scheduling. IEEE Access, 13, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.0429000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aneggi, A. (2025). GreenDevLoop: Power-Aware Software Development with CI/CD, AI, and Feedback. In European Conference on Software Architecture. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03538-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Appolloni, A., Akinlade, I. A., Subramanyam, V., Narayan, S., & Balakumar, G. (2025). Culturally Responsive AI: Integrating Hofstede's Cultural Model in AI-Driven ESG Strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 35(2), 1830-1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.10040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bartoldson, B., Wang, R., Fu, Y., & Widemann, C. (2022). Latent Space Simulation for Carbon Capture Design Optimization. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(11), 11623-11631. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bastidas, V., Bezbradica, M., & Helfert, M. (2023). Enterprise Architecture in Smart Cities: Developing an Empirical Grounded Research Agenda. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1876, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48313-4_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Beena, B.M., Manideep, T.S.S., Saragadam, S., Rathi, S., Ramesh R., & Holimath V. (2026). CarbonWise CX: An Agentic AI Framework for Customer Support. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 12(1), 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bera, S., & Shrivas, A. (2025). Exploring the Synergy of Digital Twins: Integration of AI, AR, VR, and BIM. Construction Innovation, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2025-0112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bharathi, A., Maruthi, R., Jayashree, S., Sheela, K., Sirajudeen, M., & Narayani, D. (2026). GreenCloud: Carbon-Aware Resource Scheduling using DRL. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 42, 100981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2026.100981 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Blizniukova, D., Holzapfel, P., Unnewehr, J.F., Bach, V., & Finkbeiner, M. (2023). Increasing temporal resolution in greenhouse gas accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. ⁠Bono, F., Vaglica, G., Renaldi, G., Cazzato, D., Ojea, E.V., De Sousa, J.R.P.M., & Housen, M. (2025). From Buildings to Cities: A Scalable Smart City Implementation. Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies, 198, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Caldas, L. R., Silva, M., & Sposto, R. M. (2022). How different tools contribute to climate change mitigation in a circular building environment? A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14(7), 3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073759 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Caputo, F., Magliocca, P., & Rossella, C. (2023). Rethinking the role of technology for citizens’ engagement and sustainable development in smart cities. Sustainability, 15(13), 10400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chamarthi, H., & Muppala, M. (2025). AI integration for sustainable DevOps & cloud interdisciplinary: Framework optimized resource management and carbon efficiency. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Sustainable Communication Networks. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCN.2025.102615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Das Karmakar, S., & Chattopadhyay, H. (2024). Role of pumped hydro storage to mitigate intermittency in renewable energy systems. Mechanical Energy Storage Systems, 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49872-5_10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Devadas, R.M., & Sowmya, T. (2026). Towards carbon-aware AI: a systematic prisma review and taxonomy of green architectures, hardware life-cycle, and energy-efficient algorithms. Energy Informatics, 9(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-026-0012-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dhawan, R., & Suresh Patel, M. (2026). Carbon-aware AI control plane for DevOps automation: A reference architecture and next-generation sustainability framework. Journal of Cloud Computing, 15(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcc.2026.399948 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dos Santos, L. F. G. (2023). Tackling renewable energy intermittency in hydrogen-based solar energy system control using DRL. Solar Energy, 254, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.375858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. El Mimouni, S., & Bouhdadi, M. (2025). Fairness and bias in AI: a sociotechnical perspective. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 24(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-08-2025-0045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Elghomri, B., & Messaoudi, F. (2026). Digital twins for sustainable and low-carbon supply chains in industry X.0: Crossing the fragmented bridge between academic research and industrial adoption. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0640504 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Engin, Z. (2026). Human-AI governance (HAIG): A trust-utility approach. Ethics and Information Technology, 28(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-026-09363-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Eti, S., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Köklü, K., & Çırak, A.N. (2026). Addressing energy efficiency challenges in AI hardware: A review of trends, metrics, and future directions. Journal of Systems Architecture, 172, 103342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2025.103342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fair, N. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Sociotechnical Theory: Theoretical Underpinnings. International Journal of Production Research, 60(22), 6812–6828. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.2014522 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Fatima, I. (2023). Sustainability-Aware Software Architecting for the Future Cloud. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C) (pp. 145–150). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C57050.2023.00041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Flanigan, K. A., Ma, S., & Bergés, M. (2022). Functional Requirements Enabling Levels of Predictive Maintenance Automation and Autonomy. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DTPI55919.2022.9972322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Giussani, S., Caporuscio, M., Perez-Palacin, D., & Edrisi, F. (2025). Architecting Carbon-Aware Software-as-a-Service. In Software Architecture: ECSA 2025 Tracks and Workshops (pp. 70–77). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04403-7_8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Grealey, J., Lannelongue, L., Saw, W. Y., Marten, J., Méric, G., Ruiz-Carmona, S., & Inouye, M. (2022). The Carbon Footprint of Bioinformatics. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 39(3), msac034. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msac034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Grey-Stewart, D., Kong, D., Elgamal, M., Kyriazidis, G., Morris,J., & Hills, G. (2025). Quantifying Trade-Offs in Power, Performance, Area, and Total Carbon Footprint in Silicon Hardware Systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 10(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSUSC.2024.3411223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gu, X., Chen, C., Fang, Y., Mahabir, R., & Fan, L. (2025). CECA: An intelligent LLM-enabled method for accounting embodied carbon in buildings. Automation in Construction, 171, 106012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.106012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Haldar, U., Rahman, M. M., Miah, M. A., Uddin, M., & Yousuf, S. B. (2025). AI-Driven MIS and Business Analytics Framework for Sustainable Innovation. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on NexGen Networks and Cybernetics (IC2NC). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2NC63152.2025.1094321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Huang, D., Zhan, Y., & Lonsdale, C. (2025). Utilising Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Firm Circular Economy Maturity: A Thematic Review via Machine Learning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(5), 6135–6158. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ipung, H. P. (2024). A Novel Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Architecture Framework (NAEF) for business capabilities to decisions/insights analysis. International Conference on Intelligent Cybernetics Technology. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389762488_A_Novel_Enterprise_Artificial_Intelligence_Architecture_Framework_NAEF_for_Business_Capabilities_to_DecisionsInsights_Analysis [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Jena, C., Guerrero, J. M., Abusorrah, A., Al-Turki, Y., & Khan, B. (2022). Multi-objective generation scheduling of hydro-thermal system incorporating energy storage with demand side management considering renewable energy uncertainties. IEEE Access, 10, 52343–52357. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ji, S., Yang, Z., Chen, X., Cahoon, S., Hu, J., Shi, Y., Jones, A.K., & Zhou, P. (2024). SCARIF: Towards carbon modeling of cloud servers with accelerators. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.06270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Johnathon, C., Agalgaonkar, A.P., Planiden, C., & Kennedy, J. (2023). A proposed hedge-based energy market model for multi-objective optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Renewable Energy and Grid Integration. IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Karishma, & Kumar, H. (2026). A novel hybrid WOA–GWO algorithm for multi-objective optimization of energy efficiency and reliability in heterogeneous computing. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 131(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2025.104106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kavitha, J. J. S. (2026). Pipelines for proof: Devops automation, traceability, and reproducibility of software development workflows. IEEE Software, 33(3), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2026.26176845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kim, K.-M., Lee, S.-S., Hong, S.-P., & Lee, S.-J. (2025). Development of a citizen-participatory carbon challenge platform: Imagining carbon-neutral futures through digital community planning. Digital Participatory Platforms (DPPs) & Geospatial Planning Journal, 12(3), 201–215. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375032300_Imagining_Carbon-Neutral_Futures_Comprehensive_Narratives_Through_Citizen_Participation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kuo, M.-T. (2025). Multi-objective scheduling of thermal generation units under atmospheric pollutant constraints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 120859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.120859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Lee, J. (2025). Aligning AI infrastructure with climate goals: Governance lessons from four data center regions. In Proceedings of the 2025 International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). IEEE. https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/Joongho-Lee/2377683688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lehmann, S. (2025). Transforming the construction industry to become more resourceful: The knowledge gaps in mass timber construction systems. In Life Cycle Impacts of Forest Management and Wood Utilization. Crossref. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-406259616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Li, Y., Li, M., Hou, C., Gao, Y., Wang, Q., & Tian, J. (2024). Construction and implementation of a digital carbon management system for steel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Lnenicka, M., Palla, D., & Poulová, P. (2026). Governing complexity in sustainable innovation ecosystems: An empirical analysis for AI-enabled enterprise architecture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2026.123490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Müller, F., Leinauer, C., & Hofmann, J. (2023). Digital Decarbonization: Design Principles for an Enterprise-wide Emissions Data Architecture. In Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2023), 4001–4010. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2023.486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Mungle, S., Rewatkar, R., & Motewar, A. (2025). Carbon-Aware Computing: Redesigning Algorithms for a Greener Future. Green AI and Carbon-Aware Computing: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications, 12(3), 450–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Pedrozo, H.A., & Zamarripa, M.A., Uribe-Rodríguez, A., Panagakos, G., Diaz, M.S., & Biegler, L.T. (2025). Surrogate model optimization: a comparison case study with pooling problems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 181, 108520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Pérez-Castro, N. (2026). The Impact of Crossover and Mutation on Carbon Emissions in Evolutionary Algorithms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14521, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89021-3_9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Poo-Udom, A. (2026). A socio-technical architecture for culturally adaptive AI systems. Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies, 204, 301–315. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1008210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Poojay, S.S., Kamble, S., & Mamatha, G.S. (2025). A Scalable DevOps Framework Using Kubernetes-Orchestrated Microservices for Environmental Monitoring. Journal of Cloud Computing, 14(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-025-00712-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Qureshi, M.I., Khan, N., Liu, J., & Saritas, O. (2025). Introduction to digital platforms and sustainable business. Sustainable Business and Digital Transformation, 1–18. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99042-5_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Ranpara, R. (2025). Energy-efficient green AI architectures for circular economies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(2), 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Rao, V., & Chien, A. (2025). EasyC: Practical carbon-emissions estimates for research computing systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.13583v2. https://arxiv.org/html/2509.13583v2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Shabestari, M. R., Shameli-Sendi, A., & Amiri, M. (2025). An intelligent VM placement method for minimizing energy cost and carbon emission in distributed cloud data centers. Journal of Cloud Computing, 14(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-025-00789-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rebello, C. M., Nogueira, I., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2024). Optimizing CO2 capture in pressure swing adsorption units through deep learning surrogate models. Chemical Engineering Journal, 481, 148201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.148201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Reichelstein, S. (2025). Innovations in corporate carbon accounting. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 19(3-4), 215-305. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Röder, F., Schmidt, M., & Meyer, J. (2025). A comprehensive approach to a digital twin based on asset administration shells for a process chain of automated tape laying and thermoforming. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM 2025). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18597078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Sadou Ammar, A., Abrahams, G., & Rute Costa, A. (2026). Whole life cycle carbon in construction: A systematic review of policy, planning and assessment tools (2012–2024). Energy and Buildings, 360, 117366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Sandaruwan, I. P., Yiu, T. W., & Rotimi, J. O. B. (2025). Technology-based embodied carbon emissions tracking and monitoring systems for buildings: Review of systems, benefits, limitations, challenges and future directions. Buildings, 15(24), 4421. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15244421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Seidenfad, K., Wagner, T., Hrestic, R., & Leimeister, U. (2022). Demonstrating feasibility of blockchain-driven carbon accounting – a design study and demonstrator. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1603, 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11444-1_7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. She, R., Jin, Y., & Li, K. (2025). Energy-aware scheduling for reliability-oriented real-time parallel applications on heterogeneous clusters. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 36(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2024.3411029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Shi, L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). Optimal allocation of energy storage capacity in microgrids considering carbon emissions with nested multiple time scales. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 158, 109912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.109912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Siri, D., Sandhya, T., Pandey, S., Deorari, R., Kaur, N., Aneja, A., Bansal, S., & Almusawi, M. (2024). Carbon Capture and Storage Optimization with Machine Learning using an ANN model. E3S Web of Conferences, 588, 01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458801003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Sun, B., Chen, K., Chen, Z., Wang, C., Yan, Y., Tang, J., & Liu, Y. (2025). Empowering community-scale carbon accounting with digital twin technology: Current needs, development trends, and prospects. Journal of Geo-information Science, 27(7), 1671–1686. https://doi.org/10.12082/dqxxkx.2025.250058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Taisiq, S. A. (2026). CAS-NAS: A carbon-aware neural architecture search framework for sustainable AI development. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Tousert, N., Lipitakis, A.-D., & Papageorgiou, X.S. (2025). A multi-layer enterprise architecture for blockchain-enabled cereal supply chain traceability and decision support. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 59(34), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.12.437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Umbrello, S. (2022). The role of engineers in harmonising human values for AI systems design. Preprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Varrey, J. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence for sustainable cloud computing security services: An interdisciplinary approach. In Proceedings of the 2025 10th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Vepřek, L. H. (2025). Intraversions of human-AI relations: A cultural studies perspective on human-in-the-loop systems. ProQuest. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Verderame, L., Caviglione, L., Carbone, R., & Merlo, A. (2023). SecCo: Automated services to secure containers in the DevOps paradigm. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Research in Adaptive and Convergent Systems (RACS 2023). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3599957.3606222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Woodruff, J., Schall, D., O’Boyle, M.F.P., & Woodruff, C. (2023). When does saving power save the planet? IEEE Micro, 43(4), 45–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Xu, K., Sun, D., Tian, H., Zhang, J., & Chen, K. (2025). GREEN: Carbon-efficient resource scheduling for ML clusters. In Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Zhang, L., Ai, M., Liu, K., Chen, J., & Li, K. (2024). Reliability Enhancement Strategies for Workflow Scheduling Under Energy Consumption Constraints in Clouds. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 9(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSUSC.2023.3738932 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Zhang, S., Xu, M., Bryan Lim, W.Y., & Niyato, D. (2023). Sustainable AIGC Workload Scheduling of Geo-Distributed Data Centers: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.00000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Zhang, X., Bao, Y., Zhou, T., & Wang, D. (2024). CarbonReveal: Embodied Carbon Accounting with Retrieval-Augmented LLM for Computer Systems. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Zhang, X., Yang, Y., & Wang, D. (2025). Spatial-Temporal Embodied Carbon Models With Dual Carbon Attribution for Embodied Carbon Accounting of Computer Systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 74(12), 4037–4049. https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2024.11150750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Zhang, X., Guo, X., Zhao, J., Xiong, J., & Tian, Y. (2025). Intelligent application of large language model to life cycle assessment methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 480, 120000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.120000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Zhao, Y., Nazaré, T., & Nepomuceno, E. (2023). Reduction of carbon footprint of dynamical system simulation. Journal of Computational Science, 72, 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcoef.2023.102000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study