Exploring Cultural Attitude and Nature Relatedness Among Indigenous People

Authors

Rhayzaly T. Blanco

Southern Luzon State University – Polillo Campus (Philippines)

Ann Rose Bon

Southern Luzon State University – Polillo Campus (Philippines)

Aila L. Nilo

Southern Luzon State University – Polillo Campus (Philippines)

Ronald T. Umali

Southern Luzon State University – Polillo Campus (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.916SCO0022

Subject Category: Sociology

Volume/Issue: 9/16 | Page No: 226-234

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-07

Accepted: 2025-10-13

Published: 2025-11-10

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between cultural views and nature relatedness among Indigenous Peoples in Polillo, Quezon. Using a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, data were gathered from 40 respondents. Results revealed that participants strongly upheld positive cultural values and ecological awareness, reflecting a deep sense of cultural identity. However, regression analysis showed that only age and sex significantly predicted nature relatedness, with older individuals and women demonstrating stronger connections with nature. Cultural attitude and educational attainment showed no significant influence. These findings suggest that while Indigenous cultural values align with ecological consciousness, demographic factors play a more crucial role in shaping nature relatedness. The results support the Biophilia Hypothesis and Self-Determination Theory, emphasizing how intrinsic motivation and lived experiences foster human–nature connection.

Keywords

Cultural Attitude, Nature Relatedness, Indigenous People

Downloads

References

1. Abas, A., Aziz, A., & Awang, A. (2022). A Systematic review on the local wisdom of Indigenous peoplein nature conservation. Sustainability, 14(6), 3415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Absolor, J. L., Batara, O., Garcia, M. T. T., Morla, E. L., Carino, C. M., & Orpia, C. B. (2023). Cultural Practices of the Indigenous Peoples (IPS) of San Emilio Ilocos Sur: Then and now. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VII(VII), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2023.70732 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agatha, J. T. R., Kefi, A. I., Gultom, T. A., Antasya, J. D., Witjaksono, R. N., & Adiwena, B.Y. (2024). Hubungan Nature Relatedness dan Perilaku Membuang Sampah Sembarangan oleh Mahasiswa. Suksma Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma, 5(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.24071/suksma.v5i2.5878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Agustina, E. T., Wahyudin, A. Y., & Pratiwi, A. A. (2021). The Students’ Motivation and Academic [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Achievement at Tertiary Level: A Correlational study. Journal of Arts and Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33365/jae.v1i1.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Barragan‐Jason, G., De Mazancourt, C., Parmesan, C., Singer, M. C., & Loreau, M. (2021). Human–nature connectedness as a pathway to sustainability: A global meta‐analysis. Conservation Letters, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12852 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brondízio, E. S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bates, P., Carino, J., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Ferrari, M. F., Galvin, K., Reyes-García, V., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., Samakov, A., & Shrestha, U. B. (2021). Locally based, regionally manifested, and globally relevant: indigenous and local knowledge, values, and practices for nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Canaza-Choque, F. A. (2022). En la era del desgarramiento: Tensión y retransformación de la identidad cultural en los dominios de la globalización. La Vida & La Historia, 8(2), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.33326/26176041.2021.2.1333 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chakraborty, S., & Sadachar, A. (2022). Can a connection with the indigenous cultural values encourage sustainable apparel consumption? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 27(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-07-2021-0191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Davidov, A., Razumnikova, O., & Bakaev, M. (2023). Nature in the heart and mind of the beholder: Psycho-Emotional and EEG differences in perception of virtual nature due to gender. Vision, 7(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision7020030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. De Sousa Sá, F. A., Osório, N. B., Neto, L. S. S., Santana, L. S. B., Filho, F. a. N., Oliveira, N.P. B., De Oliveira Brito, M. S., De Sousa Almeida, F., & Alves, A. K. S. (2024). The Relationship Between Elderly People And Nature: Impacts Of Traditional Knowledge On Promoting Well-Being And Quality Of Life. Aracê., 6(3). https://doi.org/10.56238/arev6n3006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dehong, S. (2024). Value Recognition: The international communication of shared human values and aesthetics: A case study of the overseas dissemination and reception of Chinese literature. Social Sciences in China, 45(3), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2024.2403268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Franca, N. G. C., & Lumogdang, N. L. P. (2022). Profiling On Cultural Preservation Of The Blaan Tribe Of Kiblawan, Davao Del Sur, Philippines. EPRA International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Economic Research, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra10613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Grabowska-Chenczke, O., Wajchman-Świtalska, S., & Woźniak, M. (2022). Psychological Well-Being and Nature Relatedness. Forests, 13(7), 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Higgins, N. (2022a). Changing Climate; Changing Life—Climate change and indigenous intangible cultural heritage. Laws, 11(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11030047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Highfield, C., & Webber, M. (2021). Mana Ūkaipō: Māori Student Connection, Belonging and engagement at school. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-021-00226-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Huynh, L. T. M., Gasparatos, A., Su, J., Lam, R. D., Grant, E. I., & Fukushi, K. (2022a). Linking the nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature relations and human well-being through cultural ecosystem services. Science Advances, 8(31). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn8042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Keaulana, S., Kahili-Heede, M., Riley, L., Park, M. L. N., Makua, K. L., Vegas, J. K., & Antonio, M. C. K. (2021b). A scoping review of nature, land, and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. environmental connectedness and relatedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115897 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kerubo, C. (2024). The impact of globalization on cultural identity. International Journal of Philosophy, 3(4), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lee, J., & Burns, R. C. (2022). Older adults’ preferences for natural environment and rural life: Intergenerational transmission of pro-environmental motivation. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 39, 100556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100556 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lugo-Espinosa, G., Acevedo-Ortiz, M. A., Aquino-Bolaños, T., Ortiz-Hernández, Y. D., Ortiz- Hernández, F. E., Pérez-Pacheco, R., & López-Cruz, J. Y. (2024). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Cultural Heritage, Migration, and Land Use transformation in San José Chiltepec, Oaxaca. Land, 13(10), 1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Luza, J. G. (2023). Conceptualizing Indigenous Identity: Negotiation of internal and external factors for indigenization. International Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research And Analysis, 06(06). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i6-30 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mavisakalyan, A., Sharma, S., & Weber, C. (2023). Pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being: Culture has a role to play. Ecological Economics, 217, 108081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Menzies, A. K., Bowles, E., McGregor, D., Ford, A. T., & Popp, J. N. (2024). Sharing Indigenous values, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. practices and priorities as guidance for transforming human– environment relationships. People and Nature, 6(5), 2109–2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10707 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nedashkivska, T., Zarichanskyi, O., Pugachov, V., Shostak, V., & Stoliarchuk, N. (2024). Analysis of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. cultural and identity transformations in the modern world. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(10), 2024244. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nicholas, G. (2021). Protecting Indigenous heritage objects, places, and values: challenges, responses, and responsibilities. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(3), 400–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.2009539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Niigaaniin, M., & MacNeill, T. (2022). Indigenous Culture and Nature Relatedness: Results from a Community-Led Study. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4105338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Paing, J. N., Van Bussel, L. G., Gomez, R. A., & Hein, L. G. (2022). Ecosystem services through the lens of indigenous people in the highlands of Cordillera Region, Northern Philippines. Journal of Environmental Management, 308, 114597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Pudjiastuti, S. R., Hadi, N., Arfani, H., Akbar, R. P., & Tajudin, A. S. (2021). The Culture and Local Wisdom Of The Indigenous People Kasepuhan Sinar Resmi. Jhss (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 5(2), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v5i2.4067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Schultz, M., Jamieson, H., Piontek, E., Coon, J. J., & Halsey, S. J. (2022). The Importance of Cultural Values [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. in Ecological Restorations: A Systematic review. Society & Natural Resources, 35(9), 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2073625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sockhill, N. J., Dean, A. J., Oh, R. R. Y., & Fuller, R. A. (2022). Beyond the ecocentric: Diverse values and attitudes influence engagement in pro‐environmental behaviours. People and Nature, 4(6), 1500–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sumitro, S., Jumadi, J., Idrus, I. I., & Kamaruddin, S. A. (2024). The existence of the Indigenous people of Cek Bocek in Lawin Village, Sumbawa. Socio-economic and Humanistic Aspects for Township and Industry., 2(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.59535/sehati.v2i4.337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Tanalgo, K. C., Plang, Y., Cruz, K. C. D., Rubio, M. M., Hilario‐Husain, B. A., Respicio, J. M. V., Lidasan, A. K., Abdullah, S. S., Fabrero, G. V. N., Ele, R. J. A., Murray, S. A., Saliling, Y. V., Macatabon, R. A., Casim, L. F., Reyes, J. D., & Agduma, A. R. (2025). Diversity and ecological factors influencing medicinal plant use among ethnolinguistic groups in the Philippines. Integrative Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1002/inc3.70011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Tassell-Matamua, N., Lindsay, N., Bennett, A., & Masters-Awatere, B. (2020). Māori cultural identity linked to greater regard for nature: attitudes and (Less so) behavior. Ecopsychology, 13(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2020.0027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Titaley, E., & Watloly, A. (2021a). The Cultural Values Of The Island’s Indigenous People. Sosiohumaniora, 23(3), 313. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v23i3.28235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Toigo, C. H., Ravenscroft, N., & De Mattos, E. J. (2022). The role of contextual values in the formation of ecological behaviours. Environmental Values, 32(4), 385–409.https://doi.org/10.3197/096327122x16611552268690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles