Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Toward Ethical AI-Assisted Programming Among Filipino Computer Science Students
Authors
Department of MS Computer Science. AMA University (Philippines)
Department of MS Computer Science. AMA University (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0497
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 6776-6789
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-08
Accepted: 2026-07-13
Published: 2026-08-08
Abstract
This study Investigate how Filipino Computer Science students understand and handle ethical issues related to AI in programming. With artificial intelligence tools becoming common in coding, like code generators and debugging help students are experiencing big changes in their learning and how they develop software. These tools can make coding faster and help solve problems better, but they also bring important ethical challenges. Issues like academic honesty, data privacy, cybersecurity risks, and the reliability of AI-generated code are significant concerns. One worry is that students might misuse AI tools by submitting work that isn’t their own, not properly checking AI suggestions, or exposing sensitive data. Such actions can harm both the security of information systems and students’ programming skills. It’s essential to check that students are not only technically skilled but also aware of ethical standards when using AI tools. The study used a survey with a structured questionnaire based on the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) model to measure students' knowledge, attitudes, and actual practices regarding ethical AI. The questionnaire was validated by experts, ensuring its reliability. Results were collected from online surveys and analyzed to identify trends. The findings showed that most students have a good understanding of ethical AI and tend to have positive attitudes about using AI responsibly. Many students also reported good practices, like avoiding plagiarism and being careful with sensitive information. However, there are areas needing attention, particularly in being transparent about AI use in academic work and checking the accuracy of AI-generated code. The study emphasizes the need for better ethical training in Computer Science programs, suggesting that schools should develop clear guidelines to promote responsible AI usage. This will help prepare future developers for the ethical challenges they will face.
Keywords
AI-assisted programming, ethical AI, KAP, computer science students, cybersecurity awareness
Downloads
References
1. Al Zaidy, A. (2024). The impact of generative AI on student engagement and ethics in higher education. Journal of Information Technology, Computing, and Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2024.v1.i1.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ali, O., Murray, P. A., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Malik, T. (2024). The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Andrade, C., Menon, V., Ameen, S., & Praharaj, S. K. (2020). Designing and conducting knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys in psychiatry: Practical guidance. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 478-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620946111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Arguson, A. C., Mabborang, M. P., & Paculanan, R. S. (2023). The acceptability of generative AI tools of selected senior high school teachers in Schools Division Office Manila, Philippines. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Neural Networks, 36, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.55529/jaimlnn.36.1.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Asio, J. M. R., Rivera, M. S. C., Cruz, C. I., Dela Cruz, A. J. L., & Quimen, V. C., Jr. (2023). Adoption of AI tools in academic and health sciences research. Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.53378/jahsmr.353300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Asio, J. M. R., Dela Cruz, A. J. L., Oconer, S. M. P., & Quimen, V. C., Jr. (2025). Level of student attitudes towards artificial intelligence: Perspectives from nursing students. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 6(3), Article 35613. https://doi.org/10.33902/ijods.202535613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Atemkeng, M., Hamlomo, S., Welman, B., Oyetunji, N., Ataei, P., & Fendji, J. L. K. E. (2024). Ethics of software programming with generative AI: Is programming without generative AI always radical? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.10554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ayanwale, M. A., & Ndlovu, M. (2024). Investigating factors of students’ behavioral intentions to adopt chatbot technologies in higher education: Perspective from expanded diffusion theory of innovation. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, 100396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Brigola, F. H. B. (2025). Utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) tools among senior high school students: Inputs for policy recommendations. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.1215000143P [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Chen, L., Liu, W., & Zhou, Y. (2026). Perceived knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among medical students in Guangxi: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1824962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Co, S. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Philippine education: A narrative review of applications, perceptions, and challenges. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 5(2), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15902950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Elinzano, G. B., Ching, M., & Iluzada, E. (2024). Towards an AI-assisted software developer: The perspective on use of ChatGPT for programming in the Philippines. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3704611.3704621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fuentes, H. C. (2025). Stakeholders' engagement and school performance: Basis for strategic actions. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.02.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gocen, A., & Aydemir, F. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education and schools. Research on Education and Media, 12(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2020-0003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Heine, S. (2025). Applying artificial intelligence in teacher education. International Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2025.2540791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Kaliyaperumal, K. (2004). Guideline for conducting knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) study. AECS Illumination, 4(1), 7-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kharroubi, S. A., Tannir, I., Abu El Hassan, R., & Ballout, R. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward artificial intelligence among university students. Education Sciences, 14(8), Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Omorog, C., & Medina, R. (2020). Internet security awareness of Filipinos. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.03669 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Pantao, J. G., Cahapay, M. B., Ulanday-Lozano, D. M. P., Pelones, M. T. P., Andang-Alaiden, E., Lañojan, R. S., Sales, A. M., & Bagayas, J. C. S. (2026). Examining artificial intelligence literacy of Filipino college students using the theory of planned behavior. European Journal of Educational Research, 15(3), 699-711. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.15.3.699 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Paredes, J. L., & Victoriano, M. A. G. (2025). Awareness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence-based learning among higher education students. The Research Probe. https://doi.org/10.53378/trp.191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Philippakos, Z. A. T. (2025). AI literacy: Elementary and secondary teachers’ use of AI tools, reported confidence, and professional development needs. Education Sciences, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sittitiamjan, K., & Wuttidittachotti, P. (2025). Bridging the gap: How knowledge, attitudes, and practices shape cybersecurity awareness in Thai education. Educational Process: International Journal, 16, e2025236. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Vieriu, A. M. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students' learning processes and academic performance. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Yehya, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence integration and teachers' self-efficacy in physics classrooms. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16660 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Park, S. (2025). Evaluating the impact of assistive AI tools on learning outcomes and ethical considerations in programming education. 2025 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON62633.2025.11016517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On the opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Becker, B. A., Denny, P., Finnie-Ansley, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Prather, J., & Santos, E. A. (2023). Programming is hard—or at least it used to be: Educational opportunities and challenges of AI code generation. Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2023), 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569759 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study