Character Formation in Higher Education: Strengthening Individual Attitudes and Morals among Education Faculty Students

Character formation is a central concern in higher education because universities are expected to develop students who are not only academically competent but also morally responsible in academic and social life. This study examines how student character is formed through the interconnected dimensions of moral knowing, moral feeling, and moral action within the campus ecosystem. A descriptive qualitative design with an interpretive thematic orientation was employed at the Faculty of Education, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia. Twenty-four participants, comprising 16 students, five lecturers, and three student-affairs personnel, were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation. Data were collected over three months through semi-structured interviews, participant observations, and document analysis. The data were analysed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, while Lickona’s framework was used as a sensitising analytical perspective. The findings generated four interrelated themes: moral knowing, moral feeling, moral action, and tensions between moral understanding and moral practice. Students developed an understanding of honesty, discipline, responsibility, social concern, communication ethics, and academic integrity through learning and institutional guidance. These values were internalised through lecturer role modelling, peer relationships, empathy, and collective experiences, and were enacted through responsible academic behaviour, cooperation, respectful communication, and participation in student activities. However, the transition from moral understanding to consistent action was influenced by peer norms, academic pressure, digital technology, personal convenience, and inconsistent habituation. The study contributes an ecosystem-based model showing that character formation emerges through the interaction of learning, lecturer role modelling, habituation, academic culture, peer interaction, and student activities. Universities should therefore integrate character development across curricula, teaching practices, academic-integrity policies, student mentoring, and responsible digital practices.

character formation; moral knowing; moral feeling; moral action; higher education; campus ecosystem

1. Alazmi, M. S., & Alazmi, A. A. (2020). The role of administration and faculty in developing character education within public and private universities in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 664–676. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2019-0231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Artha, I. K. A. J., Qodriyati, T. ‘U., Widyaswari, M., Susilo, H., Widodo, & Mardiani, D. P. (2025). Academic environment as an effort to support critical thinking and student creativity. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3S), 5473–5481. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0398 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arizona, K., Rokhmat, J., Ramdani, A., Gunawan, G., & Sukarso, A. A. (2025). Integrating Islamic values and local wisdom into science education: Enhancing character development in higher education. Ulumuna, 29(1), 398–428. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v29i1.1308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arthur, J. (2024). Character education in universities. Church, Communication and Culture, 9(2), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2024.2390128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Asim, F., Chani, P. S., Shree, V., & Rai, S. (2023). Restoring the mind: A neuropsychological investigation of university campus built environment aspects for student well-being. Building and Environment, 244, 110810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Block, B. A., & Estes, S. (2011). Supercomplexity in higher education kinesiology. Quest, 63(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483675 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brooks, E., & Harrison, T. (2024). Character development in higher education. In The Routledge international handbook of multidisciplinary perspectives on character development (Vol. 1, pp. 174–186). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003251248-10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Burke, K., & Larmar, S. (2021). Acknowledging another face in the virtual crowd: Reimagining the online experience in higher education through an online pedagogy of care. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(5), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1804536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cojocariu, V.-M., & Mareş, G. (2022). Academic integrity in the technology-driven education era. In Technology in education: Innovative solutions and practices (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1951-9_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Erdriani, D., Darmansyah, D., & Hidayati, A. (2026). Assessing moral development and learning outcomes in STEM education: Evidence from an Indonesian informatics program. ITEGAM Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications, 12(58), 663–667. https://doi.org/10.5935/jetia.v12i58.2839 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fujiyama, H., Kamo, Y., & Schafer, M. (2021). Peer effects of friend and extracurricular activity networks on students’ academic performance. Social Science Research, 97, 102560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hidayati, N. A., Waluyo, H. J., Winarni, R., & Suyitno, S. (2020). Exploring the implementation of local wisdom-based character education among Indonesian higher education students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13213a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jeynes, W. H. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relationship between character education and student achievement and behavioral outcomes. Education and Urban Society, 51(1), 33–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517747681 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Juvonen, J., Espinoza, G., & Knifsend, C. (2012). The role of peer relationships in student academic and extracurricular engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 387–401). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kang, C., Liu, J., & Chen, X. (2025). The impact of interpersonal trust among university students on participation in extracurricular activities: A chain mediation model. BMC Psychology, 13, 607. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02957-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Morris, E. J., & Carroll, J. (2016). Developing a sustainable holistic institutional approach: Dealing with realities “on the ground” when implementing an academic integrity policy. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 449–462). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Muassomah, M., Abdullah, I., Istiadah, I., Mujahidin, A., Masnawi, N., & Sohrah, S. (2020). Believe in literature: Character education for Indonesia’s youth. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2223–2231. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Qodriyati, T. ‘U., Rasyad, A., Dayati, U., Sucipto, & Sopingi. (2025). Family resilience in long-distance marriages (phenomenological study of open communication in military families). Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(6), e2026383. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026383 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Balaji, M. S., Santini, F. de O., Ladeira, W. J., Rather, R. A., Yasin, N., Rodriguez, R. V., Kokkalis, P., Murad, M. W., & Hossain, M. U. (2024). Enhancing academic integrity among students in the GenAI era: A holistic framework. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 101041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Seijts, G. H., Monzani, L., Woodley, H. J. R., & Mohan, G. (2022). The effects of character on the perceived stressfulness of life events and subjective well-being of undergraduate business students. Journal of Management Education, 46(1), 106–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920980108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. The Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, & Oxford Character Project. (2020). Character education in universities: A framework for flourishing. University of Birmingham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Trinidad, J. E., Raz, M. D., & Magsalin, I. M. (2023). “More than professional skills”: Student perspectives on higher education’s purpose. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1380–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1891043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study