Digital Tools for Language Acquisition and Intercultural Adaptation: Enhancing Student Outcomes in U.S. Multicultural Classrooms

This study explored the role of digital learning platforms in enhancing language acquisition and intercultural adaptation among students in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S. With increasingly diverse classrooms, hosting international and bilingual learners, educators faced opportunities and challenges in leveraging technology to support multilingual populations. The research explored how digital tools, such as Duolingo for Schools, Immersive Reader, Grammarly, and Rosetta Stone for Education, facilitated resource access, communication, and participation in higher education and secondary schools. A mixed-methods approach was employed, using a purposive sample of 120 students and 12 instructors from three Winston-Salem institutions. Data were collected through classroom observations, student surveys, and follow-up instructor interviews to assess the impact of digital technologies on proficiency, retention, confidence, and involvement. Findings revealed that effective digital integration significantly improved language proficiency (d = 0.92, p < 0.001), fostered collaborative learning (68%), and supported smoother cultural adjustment for international students. However, 20-22% of students in rural and low-income areas faced access barriers, highlighting equity gaps. The study emphasized the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model and Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework as critical for guiding technology adoption. Recommendations included targeted teacher training, institutional policies promoting technology-driven pedagogy, and student-centered digital resource design. Aligning pedagogy with technology in North Carolina’s schools and universities cultivated inclusive environments, enhancing academic success and global competence.

Digital learning platforms, language acquisition, intercultural adaptation

1. AERA. (2011). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Blake, R. J. (2008). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd ed.). Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chapelle, C. A., & Sauro, S. (Eds.). (2017). The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Crum, S., & Özçelik, Ö. (2024). Social networks as technology-enhanced learning environments for second language teaching in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 19(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v19i01.42013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Autonomous language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 4–11. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2011/emerging.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lee, J. S. (2020). Informal digital learning of English and strategic competence for cross-cultural communication: Perception of varieties of English as a mediator. ReCALL, 32(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Li, S. (2017). New technologies and language learning. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137517685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Li, S. (2020). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight-year review. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(3), 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lin, C., & Warschauer, M. (2016). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 124–147. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2016/linwarschauer.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mihaylova, M., Gorin, S., Reber, T., & Rothen, N. (2022). A meta-analysis on mobile-assisted language learning applications: Benefits and risks. Psychologica Belgica, 62(1), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nafiu, H. A., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025a). Enhancing early childhood education through technology integration in U.S. classrooms. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3S), 3427–3452. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nafiu, H. A., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025b). Perceptions of cloud-based learning facilities among U.S. college students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3S), 3036–3053. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2020). Transforming teaching: New skills for online language learning spaces. International Journal of Learning Technology, 15(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2020.108389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Stockwell, G. (2013). Technology and motivation in English-language teaching and learning. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation (pp. 156–175). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137000873_10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Stockwell, G. (2022). Mobile assisted language learning: Concepts, contexts and challenges. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tzirides, A. O. (2021). Translanguaging and digital technologies in the realm of language learning. In M. Montebello (Ed.), Digital pedagogies and the transformation of language education (pp. 137–148). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6745-6.ch007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. U.S. Department of Education. (2024). 2024 National education technology plan. https://www.ed.gov/technology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wang, S., & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 4s12–430. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.412-430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Xiang, P. (2023). The role of social media in intercultural communication competence: A study of Chinese students in Malaysia. Communications in Humanities Research, 19, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/19/20231211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zhang, Y., & Dong, C. (2024). Exploring the digital transformation of generative AI-assisted foreign language education: A socio-technical systems perspective based on mixed-methods. Systems, 12(11), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zhou, J. (2024). Second language teaching in the digital world: Why we need digital technologies? International Journal of Education and Humanities, 17(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.54097/wj03sq91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study