“A Corpus-Pragmatic Study of Address Terms in Nigerian English”
Authors
Department of Languages & Literary Studies, Babcock University (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700677
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 10032-10051
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-28
Accepted: 2026-08-01
Published: 2026-08-10
Abstract
Address terms are key pragmatic resources for negotiating social relations, indexing power, and construing cultural identity. Although Nigerian English has been widely described at phonological and lexicogrammatical levels, pragmatic patterning, especially the use of address terms, remains under-described. This study offers a corpus-pragmatic account of address terms in Nigerian English, comparing it with British English to examine the nativisation of pragmatic norms in a postcolonial setting.
Drawing on postcolonial pragmatics (Anchimbe, 2018) as the theoretical framework, the analysis draws on comparable components of the International Corpus of English for Nigeria (ICE-NG) and Great Britain (ICE-GB). Address terms are identified through a combined lexicon and concordance-driven procedure and analysed via frequency and dispersion measures, collocation, and concordance analysis across registers. The dataset includes deferential terms such as sir, ma, chief, oga; kinship extensions like brother, sister, aunty, uncle; and professional titles such as doctor and professor.
Results show that Nigerian English uses address terms at substantially higher rates than British English, with sir and ma frequently functioning as default politeness markers in interactional contexts where British English typically omits an address term. Kinship terms are systematically extended to non-kin relations to mark solidarity and respect, while oga displays a range of functions from deference to stance-marking and irony. Collocational and register patterns indicate a stable pragmatic system, concentrated in discourse contexts involving requests, directives, and relational negotiation.
The findings contribute to World Englishes and pragmatics by documenting variety-specific address practices and demonstrating the value of corpus methods for analysing pragmatic variation. They challenge Anglocentric politeness models and provide empirical evidence for the endonormative stabilisation of Nigerian English, with implications for English language teaching, lexicography, and cross-cultural communication in Nigerian contexts.
Keywords
Address Terms, Nigerian English, Corpus Pragmatics, Postcolonial Pragmatics, World Englishes
Downloads
References
1. Aijmer, K., & Rühlemann, C. (Eds.). (2015). Corpus pragmatics: A handbook. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anchimbe, E. A. (2018a). Offers and offer refusals: A postcolonial pragmatics perspective on World Englishes. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Anchimbe, E. A. (2018b). Postcolonial linguistics. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Anthony, L. (2024). AntConc (Version 4.2.0) [Computer software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Braun, F. (1988). Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Mouton de Gruyter. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Brown, P., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–276). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Greenbaum, S. (Ed.). (1996). Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gries, S. T. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Gut, U., & Unuabonah, F. O. (2024). Expressing gratitude in Nigerian English. English World-Wide, 45(3), 255–282. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D., & Berglund Prytz, Y. (2008). Corpus linguistics with BNCweb – A practical guide. Peter Lang. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. ICE Project. (2023). International Corpus of English: Design and components. https://www.ice-corpora.uzh.ch/en/design.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Jowitt, D. (2019). Nigerian English. De Gruyter Mouton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world (pp. 11–30). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Larina, T., & Suryanarayan, N. (2013). Madam or aunty ji: Address forms in British and Indian English. In M. Reif, J. A. Robinson, & M. Pütz (Eds.), Variation in language and language use (pp. 190–217). Peter Lang. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Leech, G. (1999). The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In H. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 107–118). Rodopi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. McCarthy, M., & O'Keeffe, A. (2003). "What's in a name?": Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls. In A. Leistyna & C. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use (pp. 153–185). Rodopi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Mensah, E. O. (2021). A sociolinguistic study of address terms in a Nigerian university's staff club. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 57(4), 677–707. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Oladipupo, R., & Akinola, A. (2025). Omo, what are you waiting for? The discourse-pragmatic imports of omo in Nigerian multilingual online interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 237, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Oreoluwa, B., Iloh, Q., & Mensah, E. (2025). Senior Man! Semantic classification of address terms in Nigerian Pidgin. Journal of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria, 28(1), 218–242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Schneider, G. (2012). ICE Nigeria: Design, development and applications. ICAME Journal, 36, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Unuabonah, F. O. (2018). Forms of address and language ideologies: The case of a southwestern Nigerian university. Linguistik Online, 91(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Unuabonah, F. O. (2021). Unpacking the use of bilingual pragmatic markers in African Englishes [Conference presentation]. STIAS Fellows' Seminar, Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Stellenbosch, South Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study