Climate Adaptation Governance and National Security in Zambia: Evaluating Policy Implementation Gaps and Strategic Opportunities

Climate change is a growing threat to environmental security, socio-economic development, and National security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Recurrent droughts, floods, irregular rainfall and water scarcity are causing ongoing impacts on livelihoods, food security and the resilience of communities, especially in the Southern Province of Zambia. This study analysed climate change adaptation governance and its implications for national security, to assess the programme implementation and the level of institutional coordination among the Ministry of Green Economy and Environment, the Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit (DMMU), the sector ministries, and the local authorities, especially the effectiveness of coordination itself. The study focused on climate adaptation governance in the context of national security in Zambia in order to assess implementation gaps in climate adaptation policies and propose strategies for enhancing climate resilience and socio-economic stability. The study adopted a mixed-methods research approach with a convergent parallel design. Both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered from 350 respondents using structured questionnaires and 20 key informants through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Data were analysed quantitatively using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), and data were analysed qualitatively thematically. The results showed that ineffective institutional coordination, poor governance, poor financing of climate adaptation, limited technical and institutional capacity, insufficient infrastructure, and low-level participation of communities are challenges to the effective implementation of climate adaptation in Zambia. The availability of climate information, activities of informality, lack of consultation with local communities, weak communication mechanisms and gaps in the integration of local knowledge were also identified as factors that made local communities less resilient and less able to adapt. In Southern Province, water tensions, land and pasture conflicts, farm-pastoralist clashes, food insecurity, livelihood vulnerabilities and socio-economic instability were related to climate-related scarcity of resources. The regression model showed a strong relationship between climate adaptation governance variables and national security outcomes (R2=0.721), explaining 52.0% of the variation in national security outcomes (R2=0.520, adjusted R2=0.514). The overall model was statistically significant (F (4,345) =93.54, p<0.001). Institutional coordination was the strongest predictor ((β=0.301, p<0.001)), followed by climate adaptation financing ((β=0.238, p<0.001)), institutional capacity ((β=0.205, p<0.001)), and community participation ((β=0.184, p<0.001)). The study concludes that coordination, funding, institutional capacity, participatory governance, climate information dissemination and incorporating indigenous knowledge can add resilience to climate and socio-economic stability, sustainable resource management and national security in Zambia.

Climate Adaptation Governance; National Security; Climate Change; Policy Implementation Gaps; Climate Resilience; Community Participation; Food Security

1. Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. African Development Bank. (2022). African economic outlook 2022: Supporting climate resilience and a just energy transition in Africa. African Development Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Berrang-Ford, L., Biesbroek, R., Ford, J. D., Lesnikowski, A., Tanabe, A., Wang, F. M., Chen, C., Hsu, A., Hellmann, J. J., Pringle, P., & Grecequet, M. (2021). Tracking global climate change adaptation among governments. Nature Climate Change, 11(11), 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01168-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (1987). Land degradation and society. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Buchner, B., Naran, B., Padmanabhi, R., Stout, S., Strinati, C., & Tolentino, R. (2023). Global landscape of climate finance 2023. Climate Policy Initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chisanga, B., Mafongoya, P., & Mweemba, C. (2023). Community participation in climate adaptation among smallholder farmers in Zambia. Climate and Development, 15(5), 412–425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. CSO-SUN. (2022). Climate adaptation awareness and implementation report in Zambia. Civil Society Scaling Up Nutrition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dazé, A., & Hunter, C. (2022). National adaptation plan (NAP) trends in Africa. International Institute for Sustainable Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. FAO. (2022). Climate change, agriculture and resource conflicts in Zambia. Food and Agriculture Organisation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Bunce, A., McKay, C., Irwin, M., & Pearce, T. (2021). The status of climate change adaptation in Africa and opportunities for research. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9), 093001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1b3b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Government of Zambia. (2016). National climate change policy. Ministry of National Development Planning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hiwasaki, L., Luna, E., Syamsidik, & Shaw, R. (2020). Process for integrating local and indigenous knowledge with science for hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ide, T., Brzoska, M., Donges, J. F., & Schleussner, C. F. (2021). Multi-method evidence for when and how climate-related disasters contribute to armed conflict risk. Global Environmental Change, 67, 102219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mach, K. J., Kraan, C. M., Adger, W. N., Buhaug, H., Burke, M., Fearon, J. D., Field, C. B., Hendrix, C. S., Maystadt, J. F., O'Loughlin, J., Roessler, P., Scheffran, J., Schultz, K. A., & von Uexkull, N. (2019). Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict. Nature, 571(7764), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1300-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Makondo, C. C., & Thomas, D. S. G. (2018). Climate change adaptation through indigenous knowledge: The case of Zimbabwe. Climate and Development, 10(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1301860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mulenga, B. P., Wineman, A., & Sitko, N. J. (2023). Climate policy implementation and agricultural resilience in Zambia. Climate Policy, 23(6), 748–763. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nalau, J., Becken, S., & Mackey, B. (2021). Ecosystem-based adaptation: A review of the constraints and opportunities. Climate and Development, 13(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1747779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ngoma, H., Angelsen, A., & Jayne, T. S. (2021). Climate shocks and adaptation responses among smallholder farmers in Zambia. Climate and Development, 13(9), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nkiaka, E., et al. (2020). Climate change adaptation in Africa: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Environmental Science & Policy, 104, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nyongesa, K. W., Onywere, S. M., & Omuto, C. T. (2022). Indigenous knowledge and climate adaptation among smallholder farmers in East Africa. Sustainability, 14(7), 3948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Reid, H., Alam, M., Berger, R., Cannon, T., Huq, S., & Milligan, A. (2022). Community-based adaptation to climate change: Scaling up local action for sustainable resilience. Climate and Development, 14(3), 201–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Robbins, P. (2020). Political ecology: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Simpson, N. P., & Jewitt, G. P. W. (2019). The development of the climate change adaptation literature in South Africa. South African Geographical Journal, 101(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2018.1493015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sultana, F. (2021). Climate change, COVID-19, and the co-production of injustices. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(2), 447–460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. UNDP. (2021). Human development report 2020: The next frontier. United Nations Development Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. UNEP. (2023). Adaptation Gap Report 2023. United Nations Environment Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNFCCC. (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. World Bank. (2022). Zambia country climate and development report. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study