Toward Smart Governance for Smart City Development: A Penta-Helix Collaboration Framework from South Solok Regency, Indonesia

This study aims to analyze the strengthening of smart governance through penta-helix collaboration in the development of a smart city in South Solok Regency. A qualitative approach with a case study method was employed to gain an in-depth understanding of multi-actor collaboration dynamics and digital governance processes. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis, and analyzed using thematic analysis techniques.
The findings indicate that penta-helix collaboration has begun to emerge but has not yet been systematically and sustainably institutionalized. The local government remains the dominant actor, while the involvement of academia, the private sector, the community, and the media is still partial. The strengthening of smart governance has progressed through the implementation of SPBE and digital public services; however, challenges persist, including system fragmentation, limited data integration, and administrative rather than strategic inter-agency coordination. Public participation also remains limited to service usage rather than substantive involvement in decision-making processes.
These findings imply that smart city development is still at the stage of system and service enhancement and has not yet reached a fully integrated and sustainable transformation. Therefore, strengthening institutional collaboration, improving digital system integration, enhancing cross-sector coordination, and expanding public participation are essential to achieving more effective smart governance.

smart governance, penta-helix, smart city, SPBE, collaboration

1. Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2018). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 282–291). https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. OECD. (2016). OECD studies on smart cities and inclusive growth. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264263260-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pemerintah Kabupaten Solok Selatan. (2025). Laporan evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) Kabupaten Solok Selatan tahun 2022–2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(3), 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030899 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ruijer, E., Van Twist, A., Haaker, T., Tartarin, T., Schuurman, N., Melenhorst, M., & Meijer, A. (2023). Smart governance toolbox: A systematic literature review. Smart Cities, 6(2), 878–896. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publication [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study