Technological Innovations in Language Preservation: Community Efforts in Safeguarding India’s Endangered Languages and Cultural Heritage

Authors

Dr Viju MJ

St Thomas College ( Autonomous),Thrissur,Kerala (Thrissur Kerala India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700879

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 13018-13026

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-02

Accepted: 2026-08-07

Published: 2026-08-14

Abstract

A major worldwide concern now is the preservation of endangered languages, especially in linguistically diverse countries like India. More than 1,600 languages are spoken in India, but many of them face serious extinction due to a lack of institutional support, urbanization, and globalization. With a focus on the alarming loss of languages and the ensuing cultural consequences, this paper examines the state of linguistic diversity in the modern world. It explores how technology may transform language sustainability with a focus on digital documentation, language learning applications, social media platforms, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. These technologies have revolutionized the recording, dissemination, and teaching of endangered languages by offering innovative solutions to linguistic challenges.
Among the challenges cited in the article include the digital divide, data ownership ethics, and technological challenges in creating inclusive language tools. An examination of Indian initiatives, including as government programs, academic pursuits, and community-based projects, is conducted in order to assess the progress made in the preservation of linguistic heritage. Future recommendations focus mostly on enhanced policy frameworks, proactive community involvement, and technological advancements such as block chain and IoT to create a sustainable paradigm for language preservation. In the end, the study emphasizes that in order to protect endangered languages for future generations; a multidisciplinary strategy combining technology, policy, and cultural sensitivity is required.

Keywords

English Language Teaching (ELT)

Downloads

References

1. Anderson, C. (2018). Digital language learning platforms and their effectiveness in endangered language preservation. Journal of Digital Education, 6(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Basu, S. (2018). Community-driven language preservation in India. Journal of South AsianLanguages, 15(3), 27–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bharati, A. (2016). Language technology development in India: Government initiatives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Language Resources and Evaluation, 50(2), 123–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Crystal, D. (2000). Language death. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fishman, J. A. (2001). Why bilingualism is a good idea. Language and Ethnicity, 5(2), 25–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ghosh, R. (2019). Policy and language preservation in India. Indian Journal of Public Policy,34(2), 58–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gippert, J. (2010). The role of digital documentation in language preservation. Language Documentation & Conservation, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Harris, R. (2002). Problems of standardizing linguistic technology. Language Technology Review, 8(3), 56–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Heeks, R. (2017). The digital divide and the development of information technology in India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Technology in Society, 45(3), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Himmelmann, N. P. (2006). Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Language, 82(1), 7–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Koehn, P. (2017). Neural machine translation. Cambridge University Press. Krauss, M. (1992). The world’s languages in crisis. Language, 68(1), 4–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. McDonald, M. (2019). Ethics of language data preservation. Journal of Language and Ethics, 3(1), 13–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mishra, S. (2017). Endangered languages of India: A statistical and cultural perspective. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Language and Society, 44(3), 35–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nair, S. (2021). Community engagement in language preservation. Journal of Cultural Preservation, 10(1), 15–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Patel, R. (2015). Academic initiatives in endangered language preservation. Indian Journal of Linguistics, 46(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Smith, L. (2020). Community-driven language learning platforms in India. International Journal of Language Education, 3(4), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O'Reilly Media. UNESCO. (2021). Atlas of the world’s languages in danger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles