Streaming Heritage: Digitalisation and the Glocalisation of Malaysian Genres

Digitalisation has transformed how music is produced, distributed, and consumed, but its effects on culturally rooted genres remain underexplored. This study examines how Irama Malaysia and Nasyid practitioners use streaming platforms while preserving cultural, linguistic, and ideological identity. Using a qualitative design informed by ethnographic principles, the study draws on semi-structured interviews with 20 participants through 20 semi-structured interviews comprising artists, producers, and industry practitioners with direct experience in digital production and distribution. The data were analysed thematically through iterative coding and interpretation guided by glocalisation theory. Three themes emerged: digital platforms as cultural gateways, selective adaptation of sound and identity, and the unequal opportunities created by streaming visibility. Although streaming services expand transnational reach and support niche audiences, algorithmic curation, genre classification, and platform metrics can limit the visibility of local music. The findings show that practitioners respond through selective adaptation: they modernise production, branding, and distribution while retaining local language, musical structures, values, and narratives. The study extends glocalisation theory by showing that digitalisation is not simply a tension between preservation and change, but an ongoing process of strategic cultural negotiation. It also offers practical implications for artists, policymakers, platforms, and music-industry organisations seeking to sustain Malaysian musical heritage in digital environments.

Digitalisation, organisations

1. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider–outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2019). The cultural industries (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hracs, B. J., Seman, M., & Virani, T. E. (Eds.). (2016). The production and consumption of music in the digital age. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kraidy, M. M. (2005). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Temple University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Morris, J. W. (2015). Curation by code: Infomediaries and the data mining of taste. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 446–463. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Morris, J. W., & Powers, D. (2015). Control, curation and musical experience in streaming music services. Creative Industries Journal, 8(2), 106–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Negus, K. (1996). Popular music in theory: An introduction. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Prey, R. (2020). Locating power in platformization: Music streaming playlists and curatorial power. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Taylor, T. D. (2016). Music and capitalism: A history of the present. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study