Development of a Science Experiment Book for Grade 5 Learners: A Project-Based Approach
Authors
Montessori Grade School Department, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, Camarines Sur, Philippines (Philippines)
Montessori Grade School Department, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, Camarines Sur, Philippines (Philippines)
Montessori Grade School Department, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, Camarines Sur, Philippines (Philippines)
Montessori Grade School Department, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, Camarines Sur, Philippines (Philippines)
Montessori Grade School Department, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, Camarines Sur, Philippines (Philippines)
Montessori Grade School Department, University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, Camarines Sur, Philippines (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701042
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 15294-15302
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-05
Accepted: 2026-08-10
Published: 2026-08-20
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to develop and validate a Science Experiment Book for Grade 5 learners using a project-based approach to enhance learners’ science process skills, engagement, and conceptual understanding. The study was anchored on Constructivism, Experiential Learning Theory, and Project-Based Learning Theory (Vygotsky, 1978; Bruner, 1961; Thomas, 2000), which emphasize active learning, hands-on experiences, and real-world application of knowledge. A developmental research design was utilized, involving Grade 5 learners and science teachers from a selected elementary school as respondents and validators of the instructional material.
The findings revealed that learners demonstrated a generally high level of science process skills, with an overall weighted mean of 4.07 (81.4%), interpreted as moderately acceptable. Learners showed strong performance in measurement accuracy, performing multiple trials, and suggesting improvements in experiments. However, areas such as following procedures, organizing data, distinguishing observation from inference, and using scientific vocabulary were identified as areas needing improvement.
In response to these findings, a Science Experiment Book was developed incorporating step-by-step guided procedures, structured data recording tools, vocabulary enrichment sections, reflective tasks, and project-based activities aligned with the Grade 5 science curriculum. The material underwent expert validation and obtained an overall rating of 4.07 (81.4%), indicating that it is moderately acceptable in terms of content accuracy, clarity, organization, and usefulness. The results indicate that the developed material effectively supports learner engagement, critical thinking, and scientific inquiry skills, providing meaningful, hands-on learning experiences that promote deeper understanding of scientific concepts.
In conclusion, the project-based Science Experiment Book is a relevant and effective instructional material for Grade 5 learners. It is recommended for use as a supplementary resource in science instruction and for continuous refinement to further enhance learners’ scientific skills and overall learning outcomes.
Keywords: Science Experiment Book, Grade 5 Learners, Science Process Skills, Project-Based Learning, Instructional Material Development
Keywords
SCIENCE
Downloads
References
1. Anderson, R., & Miller, P. (2023). Constructivist approach in elementary science education. Journal of Educational Research, 42(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedures.2022.08.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Barker, D., Lang, T., & Brooks, J. (2022). Global trends in STEM education and project-based learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00335-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bell, S. (2010a). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bell, S. (2010b). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 39–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Berkley, M., Hays, R., & Stone, E. (2022). Developing inquiry-based science curriculum for primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2014607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cohen, R., & Harris, T. (2023). Investigating the role of collaborative inquiry projects in primary science education. Journal of Primary Science, 15(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/22785401.2023.2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide: Science. DepEd Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Edwards, M., & Fisher, G. (2022). Science experimentation in early education: Challenges and opportunities. Early Childhood Science Education Review, 39(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03524022.2022.1553679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Harris, B., & Goldman, S. (2020). The impact of hands-on science activities on learning outcomes. Science Education Research, 48(5), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00117-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (2002). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction (4th ed.). Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Johnson, L., & Wheeler, M. (2021). Using science notebooks to develop writing and critical thinking skills. Journal of Science Education, 53(6), 1124–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciedu.2021.07.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lee, A., & O’Connell, K. (2022). Effectiveness of peer collaboration in science learning. Collaborative Science Education Journal, 29(3), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/20320547.2022.1137821 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Liang, X., Zhou, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). The role of digital tools in enhancing science experiment learning. Technology and Science Education Journal, 17(3), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313165.2022.1316240 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mark, S., & Lee, J. (2022). Assessing student motivation in project-based learning. Educational Psychology Review, 41(4), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09577-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Miller, H. (2021). Science education for sustainable development: Project-based approaches. International Journal of Environmental Education, 43(7), 812–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/13840121.2021.2010926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Oliver, D., & Kates, G. (2021). Learning through play: Fostering curiosity in young learners. Educational Play Journal, 11(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/20121-0020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ramos, P. (2023). Experiential learning in science education. Journal of Experiential Learning, 20(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1163/2156924020230019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Reyes, C., & Cruz, F. (2023). Using science journals in primary schools: A Filipino approach. Journal of Philippine Education, 51(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/11835545.2023.2021517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Santos, M., & Lazo, E. (2022). The role of project-based learning in enhancing science understanding among Filipino Grade 5 students. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 37(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-00563-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Smith, J., & Turner, P. (2023). Developing science literacy through project-based learning. Journal of Science Literacy, 13(4), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/22637202.2023.014566 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Thomas, J. (2021). Project-based learning in elementary science education. Journal of Educational Studies, 39(3), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edustud.2021.02.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Thomas, J. W. (2020). Revisiting project-based learning research. Educational Research Review, 30(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Vaughan, M., & Milne, L. (2021). Investigating the role of teacher-designed materials in project-based learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02241504.2021.1984761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Watson, G., Robinson, F., & Turner, A. (2021). Integrating science experimentation into curriculum design. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 30(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142049321113745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study