Integrating Intellectual Property Education into Ghana’s Basic School Curriculum: A Pedagogy for Cultural Preservation, Societal Innovation, and Fostering Future Creative Economy Leaders

Integrating intellectual property (IP) education into post-colonial curricula is a culturally charged intervention, especially where Western juridical norms intersect with communal knowledge traditions. This qualitative study examines Ghana’s prospective IP literacy integration into its pre-tertiary curriculum, utilising semi-structured interviews with 25 purposively selected stakeholders, including curriculum architects, creative arts educators, IP practitioners, and indigenous cultural custodians. Framed by Bourdieu’s theory of practice, Problem-Based Learning, and UNESCO’s Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) principles, thematic analysis reveals that IP frameworks are largely perceived as culturally exogenous. This generates pedagogical tensions, as educators exhibit low self-efficacy not from cognitive deficits, but from the perceived irrelevance of codified ownership logics to local creative praxis, with the current syllabus offering no space for these epistemological frictions. Paradoxically, stakeholders view IP as a potential shield for heritage, advocating for a phased, contextualised pedagogy anchored in indigenous narratives. The paper contends that sustainable IP education demands more than technical training; it requires a decolonial reorientation that repositions local artisans as primary agents of knowledge validation. Ultimately, this study provides policymakers with a critical roadmap, arguing that a carefully designed pilot phase is essential to empirically test these theorised tensions, safeguard Ghana’s cultural capital, and nurture its creative economy within the basic school curriculum.

Intellectual property education, basic school curriculum, cultural preservation, creative economy, Ghana’s cultural capital, education for sustainable development

1. Abekah‐Wonkyi, K. (2025). From colonial emancipation into the fourth republic: Lessons for Ghana’s collective management for musicians and their works. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 28(3), 914-934. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Acquah, E.O., & Acquah-Nunoo, M.O. (2021). The state of royalties in the music industry in Ghana. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v2i2.67 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adom, D., Sharma, E., Sharma, S., & Agyei, I. (2021). Teaching strategies, school environment, and culture: Drivers of creative pedagogy in Ghanaian schools. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v2i2.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adu, T.L., & van der Walt, T.B. (2022). Copyright law and academic libraries: From theory to practice. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(3), 725-744. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Agormedah, E., Henaku, E., AYİTE, D., & Ansah, E. (2020). Online learning in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic: A case of Ghana. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(3), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.726441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Agyapong, D., Arthur, K., & Nketsiah, I. (2024). A review of intellectual property laws in Ghana in the context of small enterprises’ innovations and inventions. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803925417.00018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Amankwah-Amoah, J., & Medase, S.K. (2024). Extracting innovation value from intellectual property: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 8933–8967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01225-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Amponsah, S. (2023). Akan folklore as a philosophical framework for education in Ghana. International Review of Education, 69, 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-09993-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Arhin Jnr, B. O. (2026). Capacity building and policy support: A critical analysis of the UNESCO-Aschberg Programme for emerging artists and cultural professionals in Ghana. British Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.61424/bjhss.v3i1.498 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Arhin Jnr, B.O. (2025a). Intellectual property rights and Ghanaian church music: A critical examination of royalty payment and collections. International Journal of Research Innovation and Social Science, 9(10), 8202-8220. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Arhin Jnr, B.O. (2025b). Participant-Centred analysis of transformative learning outcomes in the creative arts business and intellectual property workshops in Ghana. British Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.61424/bjhss.v2.i1.539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Arhin Jnr, B.O., & Acquah, E.O. (2025). Researcher-Performer perspectives in Ghanaian indigenous musical expressions. British Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 42-50. http://doi.org/10.61424/bjhss.v2.i1.449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Arhin Jnr, B.O., Acquah, E.O., Amponsah, E.K., Addaquay, A.P., Bamongya, A.Y., & Commeyfio, R. (2024). The role of creative artists in promoting traditional cultural tourism in Ghana. Journal of African Arts and Culture, 7(3), 27-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Arinaitwe, J., & Reddy, J. K. (2025). Strategic implementation of gamification in education: Enhancing learner engagement amid curriculum reforms in Uganda. Journal of Curriculum Development, Evaluation, and Education (JCDEE), 1(2), 1-14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Asmah, A. (2008). Historical Threads: Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Textile Designs in Ghana. University of Ghana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Boakye-Yiadom, F., Donkor, E., & Mensah, R. (2024). Toward indigenous knowledge systems: The role of project-based learning in higher education: Insights into sculpture students’ projects on Ghanaian Adinkra symbols. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5180598/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Boateng, B. (2011). The Copyright Thing Doesn’t Work Here: Adinkra and Kente Cloth and Intellectual Property in Ghana. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816670024.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Breinholt, A., & Jæger, M. (2020). How does cultural capital affect educational performance: Signals or skills? British Journal of Sociology, 71(1), 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Brestnichka, R., Koleva, F., & Molhova, M. (2023). Interdisciplinary teaching through a combination of methods: IP licensing for non-law students. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (pp. 117-127). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800881006.00016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Bulat, N. (2025). Teaching intellectual property for students of mathematics, and information and communication technologies. TEM Journal, 2504-2513. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem143-54 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Burton, R., & Paragahawewa, U. (2010). Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Bynum, L. (2012). Access to knowledge in Africa: The role of copyright. Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines, 46(3), 454-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2012.741287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Carter, C., & Spence, C. (2013). Being a successful professional: An exploration of who makes partner in the Big 4. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(4), 949-981. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Castaldi, C. (2018). To trademark or not to trademark: The case of the creative and cultural industries. Research Policy, 47(3), 606-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Collins, A. (2022). Copyright and folklore in Ghana: A question of national treatment. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 29(2), 112-134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Comunian, R., Ikpe, E., & Oni, D. (2024). Supporting Africa-Europe collaborations on creative economies: An equitable research agenda. African Journal of Creative Economy., 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ajce.v1i1.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Conti, L. (2025). Intercultural education: Recalibrating meanings, objectives, and practices. Intercultural Education, 36(4), 418-436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Darku, S., & Lubisi, R. (2020). Interrogating design pirating on the Ghanaian textiles market. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 32(3), 245-260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Denoncourt, J. (2023). Integrating sustainable development awareness in intellectual property law education. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (pp. 154–175). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800881006.00019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Dladla, N. (2024). Copyright law and the ruse of culture: ‘Traditional cultural expressions and expressions of folklore’ as a conception of racial difference. Phronimon. https://doi.org/10.25159/2413-3086/14898 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Dolmans, D. (2019). How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(5), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09940-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Dos Santos, F. (2024). Innovation in Africa: Levelling the Playing Field to Promote Technology Transfer. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Essel, O.Q. (2013). Our Arts: Our wealth and health, Journal of African Arts and Culture, 1(1), 83-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. GhanaWeb, (2026). At what point do creative artistes lose rights to their work? GhanaWeb Online https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/entertainment/EXPLAINER-At-what-point-do-creative-artistes-lose-rights-to-their-work-2018343 Online News Accessed on July 16, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ghose, A., & Ali, S. (2023). Protection and preservation of traditional cultural expressions & traditional knowledge in handicraft trade: Advocating the need for a global cultural policy framework. Revista de Direito Internacional, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v20i2.9109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Grabinger, S., Dunlap, J., & Duffield, J. (2011). Rich environments for active learning in action: problem-based learning. Research in Learning Technology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v5i2.10558 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Guðmundsdóttir, G., Gassó, H., Rubio, J., & Hatlevik, O. (2020). Student teachers’ responsible use of ICT: Examining two samples in Spain and Norway. Computers & Education, 152, 103877-103877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103877 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Gurgula, O., & McDonagh, L. (2023). Access Denied: the Role of Trade Secrets in Preventing Global Equitable Access to COVID-19 Tools. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4484507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Hashim, H., Isa, F., & Khair, M. (2023). Designing intellectual property law and creative industry course syllabus for creative arts undergraduate students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i1/16550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Holfelder, A. (2019). Towards a sustainable future with education? Sustainability Science, 14(4), 943-952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00682-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Jæger, M. M., & Breen, R. (2016). A dynamic model of cultural reproduction. American Journal of Sociology, 121(4), 1079-1115. https://doi.org/10.1086/684012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Jæger, M., & Karlson, K. (2018). Cultural capital and educational inequality: A counterfactual Analysis. Sociological Science, 5, 775-795. https://doi.org/10.15195/v5.a33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Jonassen, D., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 6-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Kharisma, D. B. (2023). Intellectual property rights education as a general compulsory subject in higher education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5725-5730. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.4579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2019). Education for sustainable development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability, 11(21), 6104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Kohl, K., & Hopkins, C. (2020). Education, sustainable development and resource management. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 90-99). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003000365-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Košutić, I. (2017). The role of cultural capital in higher education access and institutional choice. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(1), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Kwakwa, E., & Chicu, I. (2025). The World Intellectual Property Organization’s New Strategic Direction: Serving Underserved Communities and Helping Transform IP into a Tool That Works for Building a More Sustainable Future. In Unity in Diversity: Perspectives on the Law of International Organizations (pp. 310-323). Brill Nijhoff. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Mohanty, A., Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Education for sustainable development (ESD) and global citizenship for India. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development Studies, 1(2), 134-159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Morris, R. (2022). Selling Out for a Song: “Artist Abuse” and Saving Creatives from Servitude and Economic Disadvantage in the Entertainment Industry. SMU Science and Technology Law Review, 25(2), 145-145. https://doi.org/10.25172/smustlr.25.2.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Naami, A., & Mort, K.S.T. (2023). Inclusive education in Ghana: How prepared are the teachers?. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1056630). Frontiers Media SA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Nguyen, L.T.V., Cleveland, D., Nguyen, C.T.M., & Joyce, C. (2024). Problem-based learning and the integration of sustainable development goals. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 16(2), 218-234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Novick, D. (2015). An Undergraduate Course in Intellectual Property Law. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Nugroho, S., Praptirahayu, D., & Sari, M. (2021). Fairness in fair dealing on the industrial design protection. Yuridika, 36(2), 445. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v36i2.26009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. OseiTutu, J.A. (2017). Harmonizing cultural IP across borders. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 24(1), 45-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Ossiannilsson, E., Leonor Ulloa Cazarez, R., Martins Gomes de Gusmão, C., Zhang, X., Blomgren, C., Chaplin-Cheyne, T., & Burgos, D. (2023). The UNESCO OER Recommendation: Some observations from the ICDE OER Advocacy Committee. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i2.7138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Palfrey, J., Gasser, U., Simun, M., & Barnes, R. (2009). Youth, creativity, and copyright in the digital age. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Penaluna, K., & Penaluna, A. (2023). Developing twenty-first century skills for creativity and innovation: the case of the entrepreneurial educator in raising learner awareness of intellectual property. In Teaching Intellectual Property Law (pp. 46-59). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Petetsi, J.Y. (2025). Ghanaian Times. https://ghanaiantimes.com.gh/free-tertiary-education-for-pwds-starts-next-academic-year-president/ Accessed on July 15, 2026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Pon, C., & Schendel, R. (2020). Exploring processes of teaching and learning in African university contexts: The case of education for critical thinking in Ghana, Kenya and Botswana. International Journal of African Higher Education, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Pounds, A., & Bostock, J. (2019). Open educational resources (OER) in higher education courses in aquaculture and fisheries: Opportunities, barriers, and future perspectives. Aquaculture International, 27(3), 695-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00355-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Ragavan, S. (2017). The (re)newed barrier to access to medication: Data exclusivity. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3187345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Registrar General’s Department. (2026). Geographical Indications: Protecting the Identity of Unique Artisanal Products in Ghana. Ministry of Justice and Attorney General’s Department, Ghana. https://rgd.gov.gh/gi.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Rehmat, A., Glazewski, K., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2022). Contextualizing Problem-Based Learning. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 493-510). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199841332.013.24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Samiya, R. (2025). Education through the cultural dimension: Integration of knowledge with traditions and arts. Studies in Education Sciences, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.54019/sesv6n3-009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Sanda, M., Kilu, R., & Alačovska, A. (2024). Understanding creative enterprise creation, functionality and sustainability from the lenses of Ghanaian creative entrepreneurs. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2336271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Sarpong, S., Dwomoh, G., Boakye, E., & Ofosua-Adjei, I. (2021). Online teaching and learning under COVID-19 pandemic; Perception of university students in Ghana. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Sharma, S. (2020). Education for sustainable development: Approaches and challenges. In REDSHINE Publication eBooks. https://doi.org/10.25215/1300103310.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Smith, T., & Adrian, A. (2012). Intellectual property education - thinking outside the box meets colouring within the lines. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 9(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlic.2012.047292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Sonda, H., & Shifotoka, F. (2021). The protection of three-dimensional works as a means of promoting innovation: A comparative basis of Namibia and Burkina Faso. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol18.3.816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Valenzuela-Valdés, J., & Aragon-Romero, M. (2012). Patented! Problem based learning. International Conference on Education and E-Learning Innovations, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/iceeli.2012.6360611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Vandeyar, S., & Mohale, M. (2022). Philosophy of ubuntu and collaborative project-based learning. South African Journal of Education, 42(2), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Vázquez, D., Torruella, M., & Íñiguez-Gracia, D. (2021). The teaching of historical memory as a tool for achieving SDG 16 and teachers’ views on the Exile Memorial Museum (MUME) routes. Sustainability, 13(24), 13637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1324136370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study