Accessibility is Not Engagement: Exploring Students’ Underutilization of Moodle for English Language Development and Self-Regulated Learning
Authors
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (Malaysia)
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (Malaysia)
University of Nizwa (Oman)
University of Padova (Italy)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701116
Subject Category: Language
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 16337-16351
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-09
Accepted: 2026-08-14
Published: 2026-08-22
Abstract
This study targets to contribute to the rapidly growing literature on self-regulated learning in technology-mediated educational environments. It aims to investigate Moodle's role in supporting undergraduate students' self-regulation and English language proficiency in Omani higher education, to examine how students' self-regulation, Moodle engagement, and English language proficiency are related, and to identify how AI can be integrated into Moodle to improve students' self-regulation and English language proficiency. This study adopted an embedded mixed-methods case study design. The study used a mix methods data analysis approach, combining quantitative data derived from Moodle learning analytics and students’ performance results, and qualitative data obtained from focus group discussions and classroom observations. The sampling technique was purposive, focusing on participants comprising 120 students with 60 students in each class, enrolled in five-month compulsory English language courses at an Omani university. The findings revealed uneven engagement patterns with the Moodle platform, with students largely focusing on completing graded tasks and assignments to pass compulsory English courses while paying inadequate attention to enhancing their overall English language proficiency. Self-regulatory behavioral patterns were characterized by instability and irregularity, revealing notable struggles in managing learning behaviors and sustaining engagement with Moodle-supported learning activities. The findings also demonstrated that students repeatedly used AI tools and the statistical data showed almost half of the students either failed or received D grade due to poor self-regulation. This study indorses the pedagogically guided integration of AI within Moodle platform, yet the development of an AI-enhanced Moodle platform remains a significant challenge for the concerned stakeholders, requiring a combination of pedagogical and technical expertise.
Keywords
self-regulated learning, Moodle, English language learning, higher education, learner autonomy, AI artificial intelligence, Oman
Downloads
References
1. Akhmadov, A., Mutsurova, Z., & Beterbieva, A. (2023). Innovative technologies in the educational process: Trends and prospects for development. SHS Web of Conferences, 172, 01013. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317201013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akinsemolu, A. A., & Onyeaka, H. N. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in transforming language learning: Opportunities and ethical considerations. Journal of Language and Education, 11(1), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.22118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Al-Issa, S. M. A. (2020). The language planning situation in the Sultanate of Oman. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(4), 347–414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Denman, C. J. (2020). Assessing students’ critical thinking skills in the humanities and sciences colleges of a Middle Eastern university. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 783–796. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bell, R., & Warren, V. (2023). Illuminating a methodological pathway for doctor of business administration researchers: Utilizing case studies and mixed methods for applied research. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), Article 100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chen, H. (2023). Innovative educational technologies and virtual research tools: Trends and perspectives on future developments. SHS Web of Conferences, 172, 01013. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317201013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Creely, E., & Carabott, K. (2025). Teaching and learning with AI: An integrated AI-oriented pedagogical model. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52, 4633–4654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00913-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Crompton, H., Edmett, A., Ichaporia, N., & Burke, D. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2503–2529. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G., & Malaurent, J. (2021). Improving action research by integrating methods. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(3), 851–873. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Dou, A., Xu, W., Li, X., Zhang, S., & Zhang, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in language learning: Bridging gaps, revealing patterns, and charting the future. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.385045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Du, J., & Daniel, B. K. (2024). Transforming language education: A systematic review of AI-powered chatbots for English as a foreign language speaking practice. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gamage, A. N. K. K. (2025). A comparative analysis of qualitative and mixed methods research: Strengths, limitations, and practical applications. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(3), 2040–2046. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.3.0947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Guven, M., & Babayıgıt, B. B. (2020). Self-regulated learning skills of undergraduate students and the role of higher education in promoting self-regulation. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(89), 47–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and socially shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 83–106). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. He, M. (2025). AI-speaking assistants' impact on EFL students’ enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05817-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hoyle, R. H., & Dent, A. L. (2018). Developmental trajectories of skills and abilities relevant for self-regulation of learning and performance. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–63). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Inzlicht, M., Werner, K. M., Briskin, J. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2021). Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 319–345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Junaštíková, J. (2024). Self-regulation of learning and modern technology in higher education: A review. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2023-0030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lai, C., Chen, Q., Wang, Y., & Qi, X. (2024). Individual interest, self-regulation, and self-directed language learning with technology beyond the classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lajoie, S. P., Zheng, J., Li, S., Jarrell, A., & Gube, M. (2021). Examining the interplay of affect and self-regulation in the context of clinical reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 72, 101219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Lee, S., Choe, H., Zou, D., & Jeon, J. (2026). A systematic review of generative AI in classroom-based language learning: Focus on L2 or FL learners' experiences. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(1), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2498537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Liu, G. L., & Zhao, X. (2026). A scoping review of AI-mediated informal language learning: Mapping out the terrain and identifying future directions. ReCALL, 38(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344025100359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Makhno, K., Kireeva, N., & Shurygin, V. (2022). The impact of online learning technology on self-regulation and student success. Research in Learning Technology, 30. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Molla, S. (n.d.). Mixed methods designs. Department of Education, St. Xavier’s College. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Moon, S. E. J., Hogden, A., Eljiz, K., & Siddiqui, N. (2023). Looking back, looking forward: A study protocol for a mixed-methods multiple-case study to examine improvement sustainability of large-scale initiatives in tertiary hospitals. Healthcare, 11(15), Article 2175. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Nadhif, A., & Rohmatika, I. (2020). The role of self-regulated learning on students’ English achievement. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(2), 249–266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Nicol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802255139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Pachón-Basallo, M., de la Fuente, J., González-Torres, M. C., Martínez-Vicente, J. M., Peralta-Sánchez, F. J., & Vera-Martínez, M. M. (2022). Effects of factors of self-regulation versus external regulation of learning in self-regulated study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 968733. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Qiao, H., & Zhao, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based language learning: Illuminating the impact on speaking skills and self-regulation in Chinese EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1255594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(Suppl. 1), S33–S35. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Schunk, D. H., & Greene, J. A. (2018). Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on self-regulated learning and performance. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–15). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Shyr, W.-J., & Chen, C.-H. (2017). Designing a technology-enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students’ self-regulation and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Stalmach, A., Reinck, C., D’Elia, P., Di Sano, S., & Casale, G. (2025). A conceptual impact model of digital support for student self-regulation and emotion regulation grounded in Self-Determination Theory. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00825-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Suryavanshi, S. S., & Mandale, S. S. (2022). A research paper on use of technology in education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Transactions, 4(7), 25–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Usher, E. L., & Schunk, D. H. (2018). Social cognitive theoretical perspective of self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 19–35). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Wang, C., Bong, M., & Ahn, H. S. (2013). Korean college students’ self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language. Asian EFL Journal, 15(3), 81–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Wang, Y., Zhang, Z. J., & Zhou, H. (2026). Artificial intelligence in language learning: A twenty-year scoping review of applications, research methods, and outcomes. Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/29984475.2026.2647961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Yang, H., & Kyun, S. (2022). The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 180–210. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Yu, X., & Khazanchi, D. (2019). Using embedded mixed methods in studying IS phenomenon: Risks and practical remedies with an illustration. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34, 555–595. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Zhai, Y. (2026). Automated written corrective feedback: Fostering writing accuracy, self-regulation, and motivational dynamics in EFL learners. BMC Psychology, 14, Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03765-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Zhu, M., & Wang, C. (2025). A systematic review of research on AI in language education: Current status and future implications. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 1–29. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
- Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
- Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
- Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
- Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests