Mechanical Performance and Fracture Morphology of Fused Deposition Modeling-Printed Porous PLA Gyroid Architectures
Authors
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Wan Nur Aziah Najihah Binti Wan Mohamed Farikh
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Oil and Gas section, Malaysian Institute of Industrial Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, 81750 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, 96 Phutthamonthon Sai 5 Rd., Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand (Thailand)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701129
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 16486-16499
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-06
Accepted: 2026-08-11
Published: 2026-08-22
Abstract
Porous polymeric architecture fabricated via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) offers significant potential for lightweight engineering components and biomedical scaffolds due to their controllable internal topologies. Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) gyroid structures have emerged as a promising design strategy for lightweight components and biomedical scaffolds due to their continuous porous architecture, high surface-to-volume ratio, and efficient load distribution characteristics. However, the combined influence of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process parameters on the mechanical behavior and failure mechanisms of gyroid-based structures remains insufficiently understood. Therefore, this study investigates the effects of infill density (30%, 50%, and 70%) and layer thickness (0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mm) on the mechanical performance of polylactic acid (PLA) specimens incorporating a TPMS gyroid infill architecture. Specimens were fabricated using a CreatBot D1000 industrial FDM printer and evaluated through tensile and flexural testing according to ASTM D638 and ASTM D790 standards, respectively, with fully solid (100% infill) specimens serving as controls. Fracture morphology and pore characteristics were further analysed using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM). The results showed that both infill density and layer thickness significantly affected the structural performance of the gyroid specimens. The configuration with 70% infill density and 0.5 mm layer thickness achieved the highest tensile strength (33.24 MPa) and flexural strength (66.87 MPa), retaining approximately 70.4% of the strength of fully solid specimens while reducing material consumption by 30%. FESEM observations revealed predominantly cohesive trans-filament fracture in high-density gyroid structures, indicating improved inter-bead bonding, whereas low-density specimens (30% infill) exhibited stress concentration, interlayer delamination, and filament pull-out. The continuous gyroid architecture promoted uniform stress distribution and enhanced mechanical efficiency, demonstrating its suitability for lightweight load-bearing applications. These findings provide practical guidelines for optimizing FDM processing parameters in the fabrication of high-performance TPMS gyroid structures
Keywords
Additive manufacturing, Porous material
Downloads
References
1. Aboelella, M. G., Ebeid, S. J., & Sayed, M. M. (2025). Layer combination of similar infill patterns on the tensile and compression behavior of 3D printed PLA. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94446-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abueidda, D. W., Elhebeary, M., Shiang, C. S. (Andrew), Pang, S., Abu Al-Rub, R. K., & Jasiuk, I. M. (2019). Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric Gyroid cellular structures: Experimental and finite element study. Materials and Design, 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Allum, J., Moetazedian, A., Gleadall, A., Mitchell, N., Marinopoulos, T., McAdam, I., Li, S., & Silberschmidt, V. V. (2023). Extra-wide deposition in extrusion additive manufacturing: A new convention for improved interlayer mechanical performance. Additive Manufacturing, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103334 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Banić, D., Itrić Ivanda, K., Vukoje, M., & Cigula, T. (2024). Impact Fracture Resistance of Fused Deposition Models from Polylactic Acid with Respect to Infill Density and Sample Thickness. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bedoya, M. C., Restrepo, J. W., Wilches, L. V., & Rodriguez, J. (2025). Cellular Structures Analysis Under Compression Test. Polymers, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Calabrese, L., Marabello, G., Chairi, M., & Di Bella, G. (2025). Optimization of Deposition Temperature and Gyroid Infill to Improve Flexural Performance of PLA and PLA–Flax Fiber Composite Sandwich Structures. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9020031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cojocaru, V., Frunzaverde, D., Miclosina, C. O., & Marginean, G. (2022). The Influence of the Process Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of PLA Specimens Produced by Fused Filament Fabrication—A Review. In Polymers (Vol. 14, Number 5). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14050886 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. de Mulder, E. L. W., Buma, P., & Hannink, G. (2009). Anisotropic porous biodegradable scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Materials, 2(4), 1674–1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2041674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ekşi, S., & Karakaya, C. (2025). Effects of Process Parameters on Tensile Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Parts Fabricated with the FDM Method. Polymers, 17(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17141934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. El-Asfoury, M. S., El-Bedwehy, N. E., Shazly, M., & Elkaseer, A. (2026). Orientation driven design and mechanical optimization of gyroid TPMS lattice structures. Scientific Reports, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35201-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Guo, W., Yang, Y., Liu, C., Bu, W., Guo, F., Li, J., Wang, E., Peng, Z., Mai, H., You, H., & Long, Y. (2023). 3D printed TPMS structural PLA/GO scaffold: Process parameter optimization, porous structure, mechanical and biological properties. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105848 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Junaedi, H., Abd El-baky, M. A., Awd Allah, M. M., & Sebaey, T. A. (2024). Mechanical Characteristics of Sandwich Structures with 3D-Printed Bio-Inspired Gyroid Structure Core and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminate Face-Sheet. Polymers, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16121698 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Justino Netto, J., Sardinha, M., & Leite, M. (2024). Influence of the cell size and wall thickness on the compressive behaviour of fused filament fabricated PLA gyroid structures. Mechanics of Materials, 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.105051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kladovasilakis, N., Tsongas, K., & Tzetzis, D. (2021). Mechanical and fea-assisted characterization of fused filament fabricated triply periodic minimal surface structures. Journal of Composites Science, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5020058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Marșavina, L., Vălean, C., Mărghitaș, M., Linul, E., Razavi, N., Berto, F., & Brighenti, R. (2022). Effect of the manufacturing parameters on the tensile and fracture properties of FDM 3D-printed PLA specimens. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Megersa, G. K., Sitek, W., Nowak, A. J., & Tomašić, N. (2024). Investigation of the Influence of Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing Process Parameters on Tensile Properties of Polylactic Acid Parts Using the Taguchi Method. Materials, 17(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17235951 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Ötüken, R., Alparslan, C., Erhan, M. F., & Bayraktar, Ş. (2026). Reinforcement of Novel PLA/17-4 PH Stainless Steel Hybrid Structures Fabricated by FDM: The Effects of Layer Configuration, Infill Density and Pattern. Polymers, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Pan, Z., & Ding, J. (2012). Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) porous scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. In Interface Focus (Vol. 2, Number 3, pp. 366–377). Royal Society. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ramos, L. L. B., Iwasaki, K. M. K., Beck, R., Scheffer, W. C., Fuga, F. R., & De Medeiros, R. (2025). Influence of layer orientation on the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling using PLA and PETG. Materialia, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2025.102541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Razi, S. S., Pervaiz, S., Susantyoko, R. A., & Alyammahi, M. (2024). Optimization of Environment-Friendly and Sustainable Polylactic Acid (PLA)-Constructed Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS)-Based Gyroid Structures. Polymers, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Saleh, M., Anwar, S., Al-Ahmari, A. M., & Alfaify, A. (2022). Compression Performance and Failure Analysis of 3D-Printed Carbon Fiber/PLA Composite TPMS Lattice Structures. Polymers, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214595 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Syrlybayev, D., Zharylkassyn, B., Seisekulova, A., Akhmetov, M., Perveen, A., & Talamona, D. (2021). Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts—A critical review. In Polymers (Vol. 13, Number 10). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Tang, C., Liu, J., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Jiang, S., & Hao, W. (2020). Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA lattice structures. Composites Part C: Open Access, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Yang, B. (2025). The influence of infill density on the mechanical properties of PLA samples in FDM 3D printing. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3019(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3019/1/012046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Zhang, X., Chen, L., Mulholland, T., & Osswald, T. A. (2019). Characterization of mechanical properties and fracture mode of PLA and copper/PLA composite part manufactured by fused deposition modeling. SN Applied Sciences, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0639-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study