Implementation of Decongestion Program and Jail Management Efficiency
Authors
Metro Bacolod District Jail – Male Dormitory Annex, BJMP - NIR, Philippines (Philippines)
La Carlota City College, Philippines (Philippines)
La Carlota City College, Philippines (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701183
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 17233-17242
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-11
Accepted: 2026-08-17
Published: 2026-08-24
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between the implementation of the decongestion program and jail management efficiency in a local detention facility within the Negros Island Region, as perceived by Persons Deprived of Liberty (PDLs). Guided by Program Implementation Theory and Systems Theory, the study employed a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design. Data were collected from randomly selected PDL respondents using a researcher-developed, validated, and reliable questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were utilized to assess the implementation of the decongestion program, determine the level of jail management efficiency, and examine the relationship between the two variables. The findings revealed that the decongestion program was effectively implemented, while jail management efficiency was perceived to be high. Moreover, the study established a significant positive relationship between the implementation of the decongestion program and jail management efficiency. The findings underscore the importance of strengthening decongestion initiatives to enhance institutional operations, improve service delivery, and support evidence-based correctional management and policy development.
Keywords
Social Science – Public Administration and Governance
Downloads
References
1. Amnesty International. (2021). Forgotten behind bars: COVID-19 and prisons. Amnesty International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bureau of Jail Management and Penology. (2023). BJMP handbook on jail management and operations. Bureau of Jail Management and Penology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Fair Trials. (2022). Pretrial detention and access to justice: Global developments and recommendations. Fair Trials [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Fair Trials. (2023). Justice under pressure: Reforming pretrial detention systems. Fair Trials [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2025). Philippines: Understanding challenges in detention through health information system. International Committee of the Red Cross [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2025). Strengthening detention management through health information systems in the Philippines. International Committee of the Red Cross [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Marano, M. J. A. G. (2024). Overcrowding in jails: Implications to rehabilitation of persons deprived of liberty in Parañaque City Jail Male Dormitory. International Journal of Education, Business and Economics Research, 4(2), 26–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Mastrobuoni, G., & Terlizzese, D. (2022). Leave the door open? Prison conditions and recidivism. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14(4), 200–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Mosoti, D., Mbuba, J. M., & Kiboro, C. N. (2023). Effectiveness of prison decongestion programs in selected prisons in Kenya: An empirical analysis. In Proceedings of the Chuka University 9th Annual International Research Conference (pp. 88–97). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nudd, E., Aon, M., Kambanella, K., & Brasholt, M. (2024). Overcrowding in prisons: Health and legal implications. Torture, 34(3), 41–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Open Society Justice Initiative. (2021). The role of paralegals in advancing access to justice. Open Society Justice Initiative [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Pearce, L. A., Vaisey, A., Keen, C., Calais-Ferreira, L., Foulds, J. A., Young, J. T., Southalan, L., Borschmann, R., Gray, R., Stürup-Toft, S., & Kinner, S. A. (2021). A rapid review of early guidance to prevent and control COVID-19 in custodial settings. Health & Justice, 9, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-021-00150-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Penal Reform International. (2021). Global prison trends 2021. Penal Reform International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Penal Reform International. (2022). Global prison trends 2022. Penal Reform International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Penal Reform International. (2023). Global prison trends 2023. Penal Reform International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Penal Reform International. (2024). Global prison trends 2024. Penal Reform International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2022). Philippine standard classification of demographic characteristics. Philippine Statistics Authority [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Presidential Communications Office. (2024, January 11). Jail congestion rate dropped last year in implementing BJMP paralegal programs—DILG. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Saguran, J. B., Cano, J. C., Llantos, E. P., Esnardo, J. E., Banac, A. C., Gabon, M. G., & Tagle, A. (2023). Behind locked doors: Understanding the lived experiences of persons deprived of liberty in detention and correctional facilities. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 6(3), 184–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Shirley-Beavan, S. (2021). Prisons, drugs and COVID-19: Early releases and continuity of care. European Journal of Public Health, 31(Suppl. 3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Supreme Court of the Philippines. (2024, February 20). National Decongestion Summit: All three government branches unite to find solutions to jail and prison overcrowding. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. United Nations Development Programme. (2022a). Digital transformation for governance and justice: Strengthening public institutions. United Nations Development Programme [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. United Nations Development Programme. (2022b). Strengthening access to justice through legal empowerment and community-based justice services. United Nations Development Programme [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. United Nations Development Programme. (2022c). Strengthening access to justice through legal empowerment and community paralegals. United Nations Development Programme [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021a). Handbook on dynamic security and prison intelligence. United Nations. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021b). Handbook on strategies to reduce overcrowding in prisons. United Nations. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2022). Access to legal aid in criminal justice systems: Guidance for policymakers and practitioners. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023, December 7). The Philippines addresses jails and prisons overcrowding. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2024). Prison matters 2024: Global prison population and trends—A focus on rehabilitation. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. van Ginneken, E. F. J. C., & Palmen, H. (2023). Is there a relationship between prison conditions and recidivism? Justice Quarterly, 40(1), 106–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Western, B. (2021). Inside the box: Safety, health, and isolation in prison. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(4), 97–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. World Health Organization. (2021a). Preparedness, prevention and control of COVID-19 in prisons and other places of detention: Interim guidance. WHO Regional Office for Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. World Health Organization. (2021b). The WHO prison health framework: A framework for assessment of prison health system performance. WHO Regional Office for Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. World Health Organization. (2022). Prisons and health. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study