Factors Influencing the Commercialization of Academic Products among Students in Higher Learning Institution

The commercialization of university-generated products has become an important strategy for promoting innovation, entrepreneurship, and economic development in Malaysia. Despite various government initiatives and university support programs, the commercialization rate among university students remains relatively low. Understanding the factors that influence students' commercialization activities is therefore essential for enhancing the effectiveness of entrepreneurship and innovation initiatives within higher education institutions. This study aims to examine the relationship between financial support, industry collaboration, social network, and innovator's characteristics on the commercialization of university products among Malaysian university students. Grounded in the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Theory, this research focuses on final-year students from Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). A total of 104 responses were collected through an online questionnaire, and the data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The findings demonstrate that industry collaboration and social network are significantly and positively associated with commercialization. Conversely, financial support and innovator's characteristics were not found to have significant effects. These results highlight the importance of collaborative partnerships and networking opportunities in shaping students' commercialization activities. The findings contribute to the growing body of knowledge on university commercialization by extending the application of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Theory to the context of Malaysian university students. The study also provides practical implications for universities and policymakers in strengthening industry engagement and networking initiatives to enhance students' commercialization outcomes. Finally, the study discusses its limitations and offers recommendations for future research.

Commercialization, academic products, higher learning education, Malaysia

1. Abd Jamil, A., Indiran, L., Roslan, S., Lim, S. A. R., Muhamad, S., & Ismail, K. (2024). Surmounting commercialization barriers in Malaysian research universities: Paving the way for unprecedented innovation impact. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(11), 682–698. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abd Rahim, N., Mohamed, Z., Amrin, A., & Masrom, M. (2019). The significance of professional, personal and business networks to academic entrepreneurs. Journal of Research Management & Governance, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22452/jrmg.vol2no1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alam, A., Ghatak, A., Bhowmick, B., & Chatterjee, S. (2025). Developing a reflective-formative-formative scale for measuring university entrepreneurial ecosystem from students' viewpoints. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 72, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anderson, A. R., Jack, S. L., & Dodd, S. D. (2005). The role of family and social networks in the development of entrepreneurial social capital. Journal of Management Development, 24(1), 60–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bakar, A. N., Omar, A. R., Ambali, A. R., Jaafar, R., Mohd Idris, M. F., Abd Majid, Z., & Mohd Rom, K. B. (2016). Commercialisation activities in Malaysian universities: Issues and challenges. Journal of Administrative Science, 13(2), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Batjargal, B. (2010). The effects of network's structural holes: Polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture growth in China and Russia. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 146–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Burt, R. S. (2019). Network disadvantaged entrepreneurs: Density, hierarchy, and success in China and the West. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 19–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. de Jong, J. P. J., & den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ismail, N., Arif, S., Mat, Z., Jaafar, J. A., & Kamarudin, N. (2025). Sustainability of university research product commercialization at the Malaysian Technical University Network (MTUN): An analysis from academic perspectives. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(9), 2025278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ismail, N., & Mohamed, K. (2016). Comercialising of innovative research product in the Malaysian public university: Challenges and ways for improvement. Research Journal of Business Management, 10(1–3), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khademi, T., Ismail, K., Lee, C. T., & Shafaghat, A. (2014). Enhancing commercialization level of academic research outputs in research university. Jurnal Teknologi, 74(4), 77–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lu, G., Song, Y., & Pan, B. (2021). How university entrepreneurship support affects college students’ entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical analysis from China. Sustainability, 13(6), 3224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Makai, A. L., & Dory, T. (2023). Perceived university support and environment as a factor of entrepreneurial intention: Evidence from Western Transdanubia Region. Regional Statistics, 13(5), 1030–1053. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nabi, G., Walmsley, A., Linan, F., Akhtar, I., & Neame, C. (2018). Does entrepreneurship education in the first year of higher education develop entrepreneurial intentions? The role of learning and inspiration. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 452–467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ng, P. Y., & De Clercq, D. (2021). Explaining the entrepreneurial intentions of employees: The roles of societal norms, work-related creativity and personal resources. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 39(8), 732–754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nnorom, C. I., Nwogu, U. J., & Ukaigwe, P. C. (2024). Strategies for industry-university collaboration in funding and commercialization of research for the development of universities in Rivers State. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Othman, N. (2016). University-industry collaboration in research and development in Malaysian universities. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(2), 27–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pankowska, M., Bayramowa, G., Moya, C. A. D., Fakhreldin, H., Younis, Z., Nanda, N., Filipe, S. B., & Félix, M. (2025). Student entrepreneurship and research commercialization at universities in Azerbaijan, Colombia, Egypt, India, Poland, and Portugal. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(4), 708–724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ragupathy, D. K., Baharin, S., & Turan, F. M. (2020). University industry collaboration: The role of public universities within the Malaysian manufacturing landscape. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 4(1), 36–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ramli, M. F., Majid, M., Ya’acob, F. F., & Badyalina, B. (2021). Barrier towards commercialisation of research findings among science and engineering academicians at Malaysian public universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 824–839. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rosdi, S. A. M., Ramdan, M. R., Habidin, N. F., & Suwarno, A. I. M. (2021). Strengthening support services in innovation and commercialisation: The Malaysia's higher education perspectives. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(12), 555–566. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Shahidan, N. H., Abdul Latiff, A. S., & Abdul Wahab, S. (2025). Examining issues and challenges in the commercialization of university-generated intellectual property rights in Malaysia. ASEAN Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(1), 25–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sukri, W., Waemustafa, W., & Mahadi, S. R. S. (2024). The effect of entrepreneurial characteristics on entrepreneurial attitude: An empirical study among business undergraduates. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 3249–3258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tweheyo, G., Abaho, E., & Verma, A. M. (2022). The commercialisation of university research outputs: A review of literature. Texila International Journal of Management, 8(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wang, P., & Huang, Y. (2020). Give me what I want: Identifying the support needs of college student entrepreneurs. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zaki, N. A. M., & Hashim, F. M. (2019). The impact of commercialization to the research institutions. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 63(1), 27–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study