Impact of Occupational Health and Safety Training on Students’ Safety Perception and Behavior

Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is a vital aspect of both educational and professional environments, especially in universities where students are frequently involved in laboratory and workshop activities that expose them to potential hazards. This study explores the impact of workplace policies and procedures on students’ safety awareness and their active participation in safety practices. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from undergraduate students through a structured questionnaire focusing on three key areas: workplace policies and procedures, OHS awareness, and participation in OHS activities. The data were analyzed using SmartPLS, which allowed for comprehensive evaluation of the measurement and structural models. The findings revealed a strong and significant relationship between workplace policies and OHS awareness, indicating that well-implemented policies, clear communication, and structured training greatly enhance students’ understanding of safety practices and responsibilities. Furthermore, OHS awareness was found to play a crucial role in driving participation, showing that when students are more informed and knowledgeable about safety protocols, they are more likely to engage actively in reporting hazards, voicing concerns, and following safe practices. Although workplace policies also directly influenced participation, this effect was relatively weaker compared to the indirect effect mediated through awareness. These results highlight the importance of fostering a culture of safety through continuous training and awareness programs rather than relying solely on policies. Practical recommendations include providing interactive and ongoing safety workshops, improving communication channels between students and staff, and regularly updating policies to address evolving safety needs. By combining robust policies with high levels of student engagement and awareness, universities can create safer learning environments and prepare future professionals who prioritize health and safety throughout their careers. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on safety education and provides a framework for improving OHS management in academic institutions

ENGINEERING

1. Abd Hamid, M. S., Ma’arof, N. N. M. I., & Kamal, M. F. M. (2021). Exploring the Relationship Between Instructors’ Attitudes with The Occupational Health and Safety Practices at Vocational Colleges. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(4), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v10-i4/11846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah, K. H., & Aziz, F. S. A. (2020). Safety behavior in the laboratory among university students. Journal of Behavioral Science, 15(3), 51–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods: Vol. 4th Edt. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cohen, A., Colligan, M. J., Sinclair, R., Newman, J., & Schuler, R. (1998). Assessing occupational safety and health training: A literature review. Cincinnati, OH: National Institutes of Health, June, 1–174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In SAGE Publications, Inc. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hasan, N. H. M., & Ibrahim, N. F. (2023). Safety At the Workplace: Academics’ Awareness At Higher Education Institutions in Melaka. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 23(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.23/no.1/art.1616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Huang, Y. H., Lee, J., McFadden, A. C., Murphy, L. A., Robertson, M. M., Cheung, J. H., & Zohar, D. (2016). Beyond safety outcomes: An investigation of the impact of safety climate on job satisfaction, employee engagement and turnover using social exchange theory as the theoretical framework. Applied Ergonomics, 55(November), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ibrahim, S., Ab Rahman, S., Norman, H., Fariza Mohd Hasini, N., Ibrahim, R., & Abd Majid, N. (2023). The Effectiveness Safety Practices among Students at Universiti Melaka. 161–169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Joseph F. Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)-Third Edition. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kumar, R. (2011). RESEARCH METHODOLOGY a step-by-step guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nor, M., Azman, A., Fahlid, R., Isa, M., & Oduh, W. A. (2020). Factors that Affect the Practice, Implementation, Compliance and Culture of Occupational Safety and Health in Institute of Technical and Vocational Education in the Malaysia. Article in International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(October), 2020. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I9/PR290026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. OSHA. (1994). Act 514 Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994. Act 514 Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994, 14(1990), 38–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2010). Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 2082–2093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wahi, W., Yusof, N. A., & Esa, M. (2022). Assessment of Safety Management Practices Among Malaysian Construction Companies. Malaysian Construction Research Journal, 36(1), 65–87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(5), 1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study