Teacher Competences for the Twenty-First Century: From General Principles to the Classroom in a Context of Transformation

Social, cultural and technological changes in recent years have once again placed teacher competences at the centre of educational debate. The expansion of digital environments, the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI), increasing student diversity, demands for inclusion and growing concern about professional well-being require renewed consideration of both the scope and nature of these competences. This paper updates an earlier approach to the subject, retaining its progression from general conceptualisation to classroom practice and its emphasis on the axiological dimension as a foundation of the profession. Drawing primarily on literature published between 2021 and 2025, teacher competence is understood as the situated mobilisation of knowledge, skills, attitudes, values and professional judgement. Eight interdependent domains are identified: disciplinary and pedagogical competence; assessment competence; digital and AI competence; competence for inclusion, diversity and equity; socio-emotional and relational competence; professional agency and leadership; collaboration and inquiry into practice; and ethical and axiological competence. The paper argues that the contemporary teacher cannot be reduced to an efficient user of techniques or technologies. The profession's distinctive contribution lies in interpreting contexts, establishing educational relationships, exercising prudent judgement and directing learning towards humanly worthwhile ends.

teacher competences, teaching profession, artificial intelligence, inclusion

1. Beames, J. R., Spanos, S., Roberts, A., McGillivray, L., Li, S., & Newby, J. M. (2023). Intervention programs targeting the mental health, professional burnout, and/or wellbeing of school teachers: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09720-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cann, R., Sinnema, C., Rodway, J., & Daly, A. J. (2024). What do we know about interventions to improve educator wellbeing? A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Change, 25, 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09490-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fox, H. B., Walter, H. L., & Ball, K. B. (2023). Methods used to evaluate teacher well-being: A systematic review. Psychology in the Schools, 60, 4177–4198. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22996 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Lozano-Peña, G. M., Sáez-Delgado, F. M., & López-Angulo, Y. (2022). Competencias socioemocionales en docentes de primaria y secundaria: Una revisión sistemática. Páginas de Educación, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.22235/pe.v15i1.2598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Nistal-Anta, V., López-Aguado, M., & Gutiérrez-Provecho, L. (2024). Teacher competences for inclusion of students with special educational needs: A systematic review. Revista Complutense de Educación, 35. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.83175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. OECD. (2025). OECD Teaching Compass: Reimagining teachers as agents of curriculum changes (OECD Education Policy Perspectives No. 123). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8297a24a-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Pastore, S. (2023). Teacher assessment literacy: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1217167. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2021). What are the characteristics of effective teacher professional development? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education Endowment Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Smestad, B., Hatlevik, O. E., Johannesen, M., & Øgrim, L. (2023). Examining dimensions of teachers’ digital competence: A systematic review pre- and during COVID-19. Heliyon, 9(6), e16677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16677 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. UNESCO, & International Task Force on Teachers for Education 2030. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Vásquez, M.-S., Roig-Vila, R., & Peñafiel, M. (2021). Teacher’s digital competencies: A systematic review in the Latin-American context. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 11(6), 2495–2502. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.6.12542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Velandia Rodríguez, C. A., Mena-Guacas, A. F., Tobón, S., & López-Meneses, E. (2022). Digital teacher competence frameworks evolution and their use in Ibero-America up to the year the COVID-19 pandemic began: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416828 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study