Improving EFL Learners’ Speech Segmentation Skills: The Impact of Connected Speech Instruction on Speech Perception and Listening Comprehension

Language education methodology has evolved in a quest for better bridging the gap between language teaching in educational institutions and language acquisition in the real world. Given the primacy of the oral form of language, addressing this disconnect in speaking and listening instruction merits special emphasis. Learning the English language entails awareness of the segments (the sounds in the phonological system), the supra-segmental features (stress, intonation, and rhythm), and the phonotactics (the sound sequences allowed and the processes the sounds undergo in natural language use). In developing phonological awareness in learners of English as an additional language, it is how words learned in citation form—in isolation—morph when used in natural rapid speech that is often overlooked. A body of research has explored the effect of teaching features of connected speech on improving learners’ speech production. The present study aims to investigate this impact on speech perception (decoding streams of spoken language). Towards this end, 35 adult Moroccan intermediate EFL learners’ connected speech decoding skills were assessed through a quasi-experimental study. These learners’ spoken-word recognition and listening comprehension proficiency were gauged prior to and after six weeks of instruction in features of connected speech—linking, assimilation, elision, and weak (reduced) forms through listening comprehension and dictation tests. The statistical analyses indicate significant differences between pretest and posttest scores in both listening comprehension and dictation, reflecting considerable gains in speech segmentation ability. These results afford actionable insights for classroom practice, syllabus design, and assessment frameworks. Raising awareness of rapid and fluent speech processes through integrating features of connected speech in listening comprehension instruction can alleviate speech perception challenges for EFL learners and improve their communicative competence.

Education and teaching

1. Abe, H. (2015). Effects of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of weak forms by Japanese EFL learners. [Doctoral dissertation], 名 古 屋 学 院 大 学 [Nagoya Gakuin University] Japan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alameen, G. (2014). The effectiveness of linking instruction on NNS speech perception and production (Publication No. 3631627) [Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alaoui, A., Jmila, M., & Afkinich, T. (2019). Phonology and Morphology. A Practical Resource. Interlanguages. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ashtiani, F. T., & Zafarghandi, A. M. (2015). The effect of English verbal songs on connected speech aspects of adult English learners’ speech production. Advances in language and literary studies, 6(1), 212-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. J. Munro & O. S. Bohn (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James E. Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brown, J. D., & Crowther, D. (2022). Shaping students' pronunciation: Teaching the connected speech of North American English. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carreira J. M. (2014). How can we enhance EFL learners’ listening fluency? Teaching connected speech to Japanese university students using songs. In T. Muller, J. Adamson, P. S. Brown, & S. Herder (Eds.), Exploring EFL fluency in Asia (pp. 297-311). Pal. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449405_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cauldwell, R. (2013). Phonology for listening: Teaching the stream of speech. Speech in Action. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chao, H. (2019). The effects of teaching linking in Korean EFL listening class. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 25(2), 273-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2019.25.2.273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Collins, B., Mees, I. M., & Carley, P. (2019). Practical English phonetics and phonology. A resource book for students (4th Ed). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Conti, G. (2017). Eight listening-research findings every teacher should be aware of and their implications for teaching and learning. The Language Gym. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cruttenden, A. (2014). Crimson’s pronunciation of English (8th Ed). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Davis, D. G. (1993). American spoken English in real life. American Spoken English Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Demirezen, M. (2016). Assimilation as a co-articulation producer in words and pronunciation problems for Turkish English teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(2), 477-509. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.0235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research (Vol. 42). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Euler, S. S. (2014). Assessing instructional effects of proficiency-level EFL pronunciation teaching under a connected speech-based approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 665-692. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.4.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Field, J. (2003). Promoting perception: lexical segmentation in L2 listening. ELT Journal 57(4). 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second Language acquisition. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kul, M. (2016). Effects of two teaching methods of connected speech in a Polish EFL classroom. Research in Language, 14(4), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Langacker, R. W. (2009). A dynamic view of usage and language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics. (20)3. 627-640. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Leow, R. P. (2019). Noticing hypothesis. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0086.pub2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Levis, J. M., & Challis, K. (2024). Connected speech. In A. Guskaroska, Z. Zawadzki, J. M. Levis, K. Challis, & M. Prikazchikov (Eds.), Teaching pronunciation with confidence: A resource for ESL/EFL teachers and learners (Chap. 10). Iowa State University Digital Press. https://doi.org/10.31274/isudp.2024.161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th Ed). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Lynch, T. & Mendelsohn, D. (2002). Listening. In N. Schmitt (Ed.). An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 193-210). Arnold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Momen, N., & Pilus, Z. (2022). The effects of connected speech instruction on second or foreign language learners’ perceptive skills and connected speech production: A systematic review of the literature (2000–2021). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nation, I. S. P. & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rahimi, M., & Chalak, A. (2017). The effect of connected speech teaching on listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(8), 280–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching (2nd Ed). Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Schmidt, R. W. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165–209). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Suwartono, T., & Mayaratri, P. (2019). Songs helped them learn the English connected speech. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 11(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2019.11.1.59-68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study