Technology-Enhanced Language Learning In Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Effectiveness, Learner Engagement, and Digital Learning Conditions

Technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) has become increasingly prominent in higher education, with artificial intelligence (AI), mobile-assisted language learning, virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR), gamification, digital flashcards, learning management systems (LMS), and blended learning reshaping language education. However, evidence concerning technological effectiveness, learner engagement, and the conditions required for sustainable digital learning remains fragmented. This systematic literature review synthesizes empirical evidence on the pedagogical effectiveness, learner perceptions and engagement, and digital learning conditions influencing technology-enhanced foreign and second-language learning in higher education. Following the PRISMA framework, a systematic search of Scopus and Web of Science identified 706 records. After screening and eligibility assessment, 28 peer-reviewed studies published between 2022 and 2026 were included and subjected to integrative thematic analysis. The findings revealed three major themes. First, technology-enhanced language learning and pedagogical effectiveness constituted the largest theme (46.4%), demonstrating improvements in vocabulary, speaking, communication, motivation, autonomy, and other learning outcomes when technologies were purposefully integrated with pedagogy. Second, learner perceptions, acceptance, readiness, and engagement accounted for 39.3%, with perceived usefulness, ease of use, confidence, digital competence, trust, and motivation shaping technology adoption and participation. Third, digital learning conditions, challenges, and learner wellbeing represented only 14.3%, highlighting network instability, limited interaction and feedback, inadequate personalization, technostress, and burnout. Overall, the review demonstrates that technological availability alone does not ensure effective language learning. Sustainable TELL requires pedagogically aligned technology, meaningful interaction, learner readiness, institutional support, reliable infrastructure, personalization, and attention to wellbeing.

Technology-enhanced language learning; Higher education; Pedagogical effectiveness; Learner engagement; Digital learning conditions

1. Ali, S. M., Yunus, K., Alshaikhi, T., & Aliia, A. M. (2025). The use of digital learning in the EFL classroom and its effect on self-perceived knowledge, learning, and English use at the University of Tabuk. Journal of Education and Learning, 22(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241229125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, Z., & Eiten, E. U. H. (2026). Attitudes toward AI as communicative partners: A human–machine communication (HMC) analysis of undergraduate language learners. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture, 6(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2026.6.2.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alshayban, A. (2023). A study of Saudi students’ attitude towards e-learning through Blackboard during Covid-19. World Journal of English Language, 13(1), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Assapari, M. M., & Hidayati, R. (2023). EFL speaking student readiness to use mobile-assisted language learning. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.5240 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Benlaghrissi, H., & Ouahidi, L. M. (2024). The impact of mobile-assisted project-based learning on developing EFL students’ speaking skills. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00303-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braha, M. (2026). Kosovan EFL students’ acceptance of AI tools for English language learning: Practices, perceptions, challenges, and suggestions for improvement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2026.2621266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ebadi, S., & Raygan, A. (2023). Investigating the facilitating conditions, perceived ease of use and usefulness of mobile-assisted language learning. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00250-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Elansari, H., & Laachach, A. (2025). Exploring factors influencing perceived e-learning quality in foreign language education: Insights from Morocco. Quality Assurance in Education, 33(3), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-09-2024-0198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hirata, Y. (2022). Are Japanese university students ready for remote language learning? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2020-0218 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jwaied, A. M., Al Masri, A., Hijazi, D., & Smadi, M. (2024). Utilizing virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies in EFL classrooms: A novel approach to improve vocabulary learning and retention. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Khlaisang, J., & Sukavatee, P. (2023). Mobile-assisted language learning to support English language communication among higher education learners in Thailand. International Journal of Instruction, 21(3), 234–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Version 2.3, EBSE Technical Report). EBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Liakhovska, Y., Postoiuk, N., Rokosovyk, N., Malyk, Y., & Hrytsiv, V. (2025). Advancing foreign language education through technological innovations in higher education. [Journal title not provided], 19(3), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.03.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Liu, G. Z., Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Using digital gamification to improve language achievement, foreign language enjoyment, and ideal L2 self: A case of English as a foreign language learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12954 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lo, Y. Y., Shah, S. S. A., Hasim, Z., Senom, F., Saad, M. R. M., & Thienpermpool, P. (2025). Thai EFL university students’ views on the effectiveness of Duolingo for enhancing listening and speaking skills. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.40517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lu, A. T., Deng, R. C., Huang, Y. S., Song, T. H., Shen, Y. H., Fan, Z. L., & Zhang, J. J. (2022). The roles of mobile app perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in app-based Chinese and English learning flow and satisfaction. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10349–10370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11036-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Metruk, R., & Rafajlovičová, R. (2022). Perspectives and challenges of online language learning: Slovak university students’ viewpoints. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(8), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i08.28971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Niu, L. W., Wang, X. H., Wallace, M. P., Pang, H., & Xu, Y. P. (2022). Digital learning of English as a foreign language among university students: How are approaches to learning linked to digital competence and technostress? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1332–1346. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pikhart, M., Klimova, B., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2024). Exploring university students’ preferences and satisfaction in utilizing digital tools for foreign language learning. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1412377. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1412377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pradana, M., Rintaningrum, R., Kosov, M., Bloshenko, T., Rogova, T., & Singer, N. (2022). Increasing the effectiveness of educational technologies in the foreign languages learning process by linguistic students: Comparative analysis of Russian, Indonesian and Egyptian experience. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 1011842. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1011842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sulistiyo, U., Al Arif, T. Z. Z., Ha Ndayani, R., Ubaidillah, M. F., & Wiryotinoyo, M. (2022). Determinants of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) towards ICT use for English language learning. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Suriaman, A., Manurung, K., Mukrim, Apridayani, A., & Agussatriana. (2023). Effective or impractical? Discussing students’ perceptions toward learning management systems in English language learning. International Journal of Language Education, 7(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i2.43495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Van Horn, K. R. (2024). ChatGPT in English language learning: Exploring perceptions and promoting autonomy in a university EFL context. TESL-EJ, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wang, X. (2025). Application of the blended teaching mode in Russian language courses in colleges and universities in the context of the Internet. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.383084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ye, S. X., & Shi, J. (2026). Investigating the potential of changing the smartphone system language to L2 for facilitating vocabulary learning and motivation. Language Teaching Research, 30(1), 191–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221145565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yurong, H. (2023). Perceptions of ESL undergraduates regarding the impact of smartphones on learning the English language. Arab World English Journal, 2023(July), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zakian, M., Xodabande, I., Valizadeh, M., & Yousefvand, M. (2022). Out-of-the-classroom learning of English vocabulary by EFL learners: Investigating the effectiveness of mobile assisted learning with digital flashcards. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00143-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Zhang, D. Y., Hennessy, S., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2025). An investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ acceptance of mobile dictionaries in English language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(3), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2189915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zhuang, J., & Liu, C. (2026). Web-integrated speech correction system use in intelligent oral English teaching. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.409967 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests