Adaptive Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Rural Tourism: Evidence from Ciamis Regency, Indonesia

Authors

Asep Nurwanda

Universitas Galuh, Ciamis, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Ii Sujai

Universitas Galuh, Ciamis, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Ally Mom

Pemerintahan Port Moresby, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800259

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 3881-3889

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-10

Accepted: 2026-08-15

Published: 2026-09-02

Abstract

Sustainable rural tourism has emerged as a strategic approach to achieving inclusive economic growth, community empowerment, and environmental sustainability in emerging economies. Despite its potential, rural tourism development is often constrained by fragmented governance structures, unequal stakeholder participation, limited institutional capacity, and the increasing complexity of managing diverse interests across public, private, community, and civil society actors. Existing governance approaches tend to emphasize collaboration but frequently overlook the need for adaptability in responding to dynamic social, economic, and environmental changes. This study introduces an Adaptive Collaborative Governance (ACG) framework as an innovative approach to managing multi-stakeholder complexity in sustainable rural tourism. Drawing upon collaborative governance and adaptive management theories, the framework emphasizes the integration of stakeholder engagement, institutional flexibility, shared leadership, continuous learning, and adaptive decision-making. The study employs a qualitative conceptual approach through an extensive review of governance, tourism, and sustainability literature to identify the key mechanisms that enable effective collaboration under conditions of uncertainty and change. The findings suggest that sustainable rural tourism is more likely to be achieved when governance systems move beyond static coordination mechanisms and adopt adaptive processes that facilitate collective learning, trust-building, conflict resolution, and timely policy adjustments. The proposed framework highlights the importance of feedback loops and stakeholder co-creation in strengthening governance resilience and improving destination sustainability outcomes. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of collaborative governance and adaptive management into a unified framework specifically designed for rural tourism development in emerging economies. Unlike conventional governance models that focus primarily on stakeholder coordination, the ACG framework emphasizes adaptive capacity as a critical dimension of governance effectiveness. This study contributes to the literature by offering a new theoretical perspective and a practical governance model that can assist policymakers, local governments, community organizations, and tourism practitioners in addressing stakeholder complexity while promoting long-term sustainability and resilience in rural tourism destinations.

Keywords

Public Administration, Public Policy

Downloads

References

1. Saputra, G. W., Kurniawati, & Susilawati. (2025). Manajemen Pemerintahan Daerah dan Desa: Konsep Dinamika dan Implementasi di Indonesia. CV. Dewa Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Hall, C. M. (2011). Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: From first- and second-order learning to third-order learning? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4-5), 649-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.555860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Rahayu, S. P., Saputra, G. W., & Sahadi. (2025). Peran Smart Fisheries Village Dalam Meningkatkan Ekonomi Lokal Melalui Wisata Edukasi Dan Kuliner: Studi Kasus Kampung Nila Kawali. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 11(3), 915-924. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v11i3.5442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4-5), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.580746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H., & Cosens, B. A. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., Diduck, A. P., Doubleday, N. C., Johnson, D. S., Marschke, M., McConney, P., Pinkerton, E. W., & Wollenberg, E. K. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1890/070089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692-1702. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance Regimes. Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Suarha, C., Triadi, R., Saputra, G. W., & Santosa, P. (2026). Collaborative Governance Dalam Program Ketahanan Pangan Di Kabupaten Sumedang. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 12(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v12i1.5585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Saputra, G. W., Santosa, P., & Adiwisastra, J. (2026). Efektivitas Kebijakan Sampah Kota Bandung: Peran Collaborative Governance dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jurnal Manajemen Publik Dan Kebijakan Publik (JMPKP), 8(1), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.36085/jmpkp.v8i1.9066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sautter, E. T., & Leisen, B. (1999). Managing stakeholders: A tourism planning model. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 312-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00097-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sahadi, Kurniawati, & Saputra, G. W. (2025). Pendampingan Peningkatan Kapasitas Manajerial Perangkat Desa untuk Akselerasi Layanan Publik di Desa Bendasari. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(2), 59-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Saputra, G. W., Zairusi, Andhani, D., Triadi, R., Suarha, C., & Kurniawati. (2026). Sistem Administrasi Negara Indonesia: Konsep, Dinamika, dan Praktik Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Modern. Mafy Media Literasi Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wasistiono, S. (2018). Kapita Selekta Manajemen Pemerintahan Daerah. Fokus Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nurwanda, A. (2024). Kolaborasi Pemerintahan dalam Pembangunan Desa Wisata [Doctoral dissertation, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wibowo, A. S., & Nurwanda, A. (2025). Collaborative governance in rural tourism: A pentahelix approach in Ciamis Regency. Journal of Tourism and Regional Planning, 8(1), 45-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Saputra, G. W., & Santosa, P. (2026). Assessing the impact of collaborative governance on urban waste management effectiveness: Evidence from Bandung City, Indonesia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(5), 6070-6076. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles