Challenges and Attitudes of Stakeholders on the Implementation of Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program
Authors
DepEd - Negros Occidental (Philippines)
La Carlota City College (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800297
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 4497-4508
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-21
Accepted: 2026-08-26
Published: 2026-09-02
Abstract
This study determined the challenges encountered and attitudes of stakeholders toward the implementation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program among teachers, parents, and learners in a public elementary school in Negros Occidental, during School Year 2025–2026. The study employed a descriptive-correlational research design using a researcher-made questionnaire validated by experts and was employed to determine significant differences. The findings revealed that stakeholders experienced a high level of challenges, while their attitudes toward the implementation of the ARAL Program were very high. No significant differences were found in the challenges encountered and attitudes of teachers, parents, and learners. However, a significant positive relationship was found between the challenges encountered and stakeholders’ attitudes toward the implementation of the program. The study concluded that despite the challenges encountered, stakeholders maintained highly positive attitudes and support for the ARAL Program. Strengthening collaboration, learner engagement, teacher support, and parental involvement is recommended.
Keywords
Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program; Implementation Challenges; Stakeholder Attitudes; Stakeholder Collaboration; Elementary Education
Downloads
References
1. Bush, T. (2020). School leadership and management in times of crisis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1741143220934784 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. SAGE Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Dela Peña, M. R., & Escueta, E. F. (2022). Parental involvement and learner engagement in modular and remedial learning programs. Philippine Journal of Education. Philippine Journal of Education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, A., & Edgerton, A. K. (2021). Restarting and reinventing school: Learning in the time of COVID and beyond. Learning Policy Institute. Learning Policy Institute [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Flores, J. A., & Navarro, R. T. (2023). Parents’ perceptions of academic recovery programs in public elementary schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Garbe, A., Ogurlu, U., Logan, N., & Cook, P. (2020). Parents’ experiences with remote education during COVID-19 school closures. American Journal of Qualitative Research. American Journal of Qualitative Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). “Like a rug had been pulled from under you”: Teachers’ experiences during COVID-19 school closures. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12322 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. OECD. (2021). The state of global education: Learning recovery after COVID-19. OECD [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Reyes, L. M., & De Guzman, A. B. (2023). Implementation challenges of academic recovery programs in Philippine public schools. International Journal of Educational Policy and Leadership, 19(1), 1–15. International Journal of Educational Policy and Leadership [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Santos, R. L., & Bautista, M. J. (2024). Teachers’ experiences in implementing the ARAL Program in public elementary schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Management. Philippine Journal of Educational Management [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Chambers, B., & Haxby, B. (2021). Effective approaches to academic recovery after learning loss. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211028799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. LearnTechLib [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. UNESCO. (2021). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. UNESCO [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. World Bank. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. World Bank [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Department of Education (DepEd). (2025). DepEd Order No. 018, s. 2025: Implementing guidelines on the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program. DepEd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study