Shaping Lives: A Qualitative Inquiry on the Lived Experiences of Educators

Education remains one of the most powerful instruments for social and economic development, with teachers serving as the driving force behind students' learning and personal growth. Across the world, however, the teaching profession has become increasingly demanding as educators are expected to perform multiple responsibilities beyond classroom instruction. They are required to address diverse learning needs, integrate technology into teaching, accomplish extensive administrative tasks, and respond to increasing accountability measures. These responsibilities have contributed to higher levels of work-related stress, emotional exhaustion, and burnout among teachers in many countries. Drawing on data from more than 100,000 teachers across over 40 education systems, Jerrim and Sims (2022) found that accountability demands are significantly associated with teacher stress, while the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 2021) emphasized that heavy workloads, limited well-being, and insufficient workplace support continue to affect teachers' professional satisfaction and retention. Despite these challenges, educators remain committed to their profession because of the meaningful relationships they build with learners and the opportunity to make a lasting difference in students' lives.
The Philippine educational system reflects many of these global realities. In recent years, teachers have experienced increasing responsibilities as they adapted to curriculum reforms, digital and blended learning, learning recovery initiatives, and the diverse academic and psychosocial needs of learners. Beyond classroom teaching, educators are expected to prepare instructional materials, complete extensive documentation, attend school-related activities, and communicate regularly with parents and stakeholders. These responsibilities often extend beyond regular working hours, placing considerable demands on teachers' physical and emotional well-being. At the same time, Filipino educators continue to demonstrate resilience, adaptability, and commitment to ensuring quality education despite resource limitations and workplace pressures. Similar conditions are observed in many local public schools, where teachers strive to balance professional responsibilities with personal well-being while remaining dedicated to supporting learners. These realities highlight the need to understand not only the difficulties teachers encounter but also the experiences that enable them to remain motivated and committed to their profession (Carroll et al., 2022; Berger et al., 2022).
Although recent studies have examined teacher stress, burnout, workload, job satisfaction, and well-being, much of the existing literature has relied on quantitative approaches that measure the prevalence of these conditions or examine relationships among variables. Comparatively fewer qualitative studies have explored how educators personally experience both the challenges and the meaningful successes that define their professional lives. The voices of teachers are essential in understanding how they cope with adversity, sustain their passion for teaching, and continue influencing the lives of their learners despite everyday difficulties. Addressing this gap, the present study, Shaping Lives: A Qualitative Inquiry on the Challenges and Triumphs of Educators, seeks to explore the lived experiences of educators by examining the challenges they face, the triumphs they celebrate, and the support systems that sustain their commitment to teaching. The findings are expected to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on teacher well-being and provide practical insights for school leaders, policymakers, and future researchers in designing programs that promote a more supportive and sustainable teaching profession.

NA

1. Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2020). The new lives of teachers. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Schleicher, A. (2020). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2013). Technical and vocational education and training for the twenty-first century. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action-sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Magazine/Publication/Journal/Researches [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers? Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Agayon, A. J. D., Agayon, A. K. R., & Pentang, J. (2022). Teachers in the new normal: Challenges and coping mechanisms in secondary schools. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 4(1), 67–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Alhazmi, A., & Kaufmann, H. (2022). Phenomenological qualitative methods in cross-cultural education. Qualitative Research in Education, 11(2), 145–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Alinea, J. M. (2021). Evaluation of technical-vocational teacher education program towards an academe-and industry-responsive curriculum. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(4), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2021.13.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Antinluoma, M., Ilomäki, L., & Toom, A. (2021). Practices of professional learning communities. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 617613. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.617613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Berger, E., Reupert, A., Campbell, T. C. H., Morris, Z., Hammer, M., Diamond, Z., Hine, R., et al. (2022). A systematic review of evidence-based wellbeing initiatives for schoolteachers and early childhood educators. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2919–2969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09690-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Brown, E. L., Stark, K., Vesely, C., & Choe, J. (2023). Acting often and everywhere: Teachers' emotional labor across professional interactions and responsibilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Carroll, A., Forrest, K., Sanders-O'Connor, E., Flynn, L., Bower, J. M., Fynes-Clinton, S., York, A., et al. (2022). Teacher stress and burnout in Australia: Examining the role of intrapersonal and environmental factors. Social Psychology of Education, 25, 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09686-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Collie, R. J. (2021). Teacher well-being and professional engagement: The role of positive teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Doronila Maridable, J. (2021). Stress-coping strategies and resilience among Filipino teachers during the pandemic. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(1), 23–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Dotimas, J. V. G. (2023). Level of work-related stress and coping mechanism of special education teachers. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 3(1), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v3i1.62 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Farrell, M. (2020). Phenomenology in education: Bridging theory and practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(3), 231–243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gearhart, C. A., Blaydes, M., & McCarthy, C. J. (2022). Barriers to and facilitators for teachers' wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 867433. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership and teacher learning in educational reform. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 563–565. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2022). Teacher leadership and educational change: Contemporary perspectives. School Leadership & Management, 42(2), 123–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hascher, T., & Waber, J. (2021). Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from 2000 to 2019. Educational Research Review, 34, 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Jerrim, J., & Sims, S. (2022). School accountability and teacher stress: International evidence from the OECD TALIS study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09360-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kaihoi, C. A., Bottiani, J. H., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2022). Teachers supporting teachers: A social network perspective on collegial stress support and emotional wellbeing among elementary and middle school educators. School Mental Health, 14(4), 1070–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-022-09529-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). "Like a rug had been pulled from under you": The impact of COVID-19 on teachers in England during the first six weeks of the UK lockdown. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Klassen, R. M., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Teacher well-being, motivation, and professional commitment: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 757–789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Llorente-Alonso, M., García-Martín, J., et al. (2023). Factors that impact the relationship between perceived organizational support and technostress in teachers. Behavioral Sciences, 13(5), 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Does teacher burnout affect students? A systematic review of its association with academic achievement and student-reported outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101714 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. McLure, F. I., & Aldridge, J. M. (2022). A systematic literature review of barriers and supports: Initiating educational change at the system level. School Leadership & Management, 42(5), 402–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2113050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mijakoski, D., Cheptea, D., Marca, S. C., Shoman, Y., et al. (2022). Determinants of burnout among teachers: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5776. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095776 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Montgomery, C., Rupprecht, S., et al. (2022). Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among teachers: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rastegar, N., & Rahimi, M. (2023). Teachers' post-pandemic outlook on the role of technological and pedagogical content knowledge in coping with burnout under adverse conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1129910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129910 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sales, J. V., Uchi, N., & Solsona, R. (2022). Validating the Filipino teacher's sense of efficacy scale using exploratory factor analysis. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 11(11), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2022.856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Salvador, R. Q. (2022). Exploring technical-vocational education teachers' challenges and adaptation strategies in teaching courses outside their specializations. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2022.14.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Samudre, M. D., Burt, J. L., & LeJeune, L. M. (2022). An adaptation of multitiered systems of professional development to support teacher implementation of Tier 2 behavioral supports. Teacher Education and Special Education, 45(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/10742956211026672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Snow, J. L., Dismuke, C., Carter, H., Larson, A., Holloway, S., & Snow-Gernona, J. (2023). The emotional work of being a teacher educator and persisting through a pandemic. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sohail, M. M., Baghdady, A., Choi, J., Huynh, H. V., Whetten, K., & Proeschold-Bell, R. J. (2023). Factors influencing teacher wellbeing and burnout in schools: A scoping review. Work, 76(4), 1235–1252. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-220234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Villacorta, F., & Arnado, A. A. (2023). Competencies, instructional skills, and challenges of teachers in implementing the technical-vocational and livelihood senior high school track. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(2), 653–678. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.1304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2021). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 134–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zara, C. G., Balazon, F., Wangdi, T., Perales, W. F., Praditson, P., & Ulla, M. B. (2022). Exploring the concept of pedagogical resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Teachers' perspectives from Thailand and the Philippines. Frontiers in Education, 7, 981217. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.981217 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Online Resources [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. OECD. (2021). Building teachers' well-being from primary to upper secondary education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/722fe5cb-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. OECD. (2023). Supporting teachers through professional learning: Insights from TALIS 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Tanaka, N., Angel-Urdinola, D., & Rodon, G. (2023, December 4). Teachers in technical and vocational education and training are critical for successful workforce development. World Bank Blogs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Technical Education and Skills Development Authority. (2021). Annual report on technical-vocational education and training in the Philippines. https://www.tesda.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Technical Education and Skills Development Authority. (2023). Annual report on technical-vocational education and training in the Philippines. https://www.tesda.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study