Agricultural Cooperatives Pricing Policies Effects on Small Scale Potato Farmers Livelihood Outcome in Selected Counties in Kenya
Authors
Department of development studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya (Kenya)
Department of development studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya (Kenya)
Department of development studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya (Kenya)
Lead researcher, KEFRI, Kenya (Kenya)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800352
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 5459-5470
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-16
Accepted: 2026-08-21
Published: 2026-09-05
Abstract
This study aimed at determining the effect of agricultural cooperatives pricing policies on small scale potato farmers livelihood outcome in selected counties in Kenya. The study was conducted in six selected counties which are: Bungoma, Nyandarua, Uasin Gishu, Elgeyo Markwet and Nandi, that have well established potato cooperatives and serving many small-scale farmers. The research design used by the study was study cross-sectional survey research design. Theories such as Rural livelihood framework and social capital were utilized as key theories in the study. Literature review was also undertaken and a conceptual framework that showed the link of variables was also developed. A conceptual framework Stratified sampling was used to take care of the sample from the different counties. Data was collected using collection questionnaires administered to the farmers. Interviews were also used to help collect qualitative data. The total sample for this study was 353 small scale farmers from the different cooperatives in the stated counties. Data was analyzed inform of descriptive and inferential statistics, summarized and presented using percentages, means, and standard deviations which helped present quantitative research findings. Qualitative research was also conducted and findings presented. Assessment of the relationship between agricultural cooperative policies and livelihood outcome was undertaken using regression. Correlation was also done to further asses the relationship of variables. The findings indicated that pricing policies had positive effect on the livelihood outcome of the small-scale potato farmers in the selected counties. The findings imply that for cooperatives to continually benefit their members, they must ensure that they implement these policies as envisaged in their design.
Key words: Counties, Policies, Livelihood, Potato, Farmers, Small scale, Pricing
Keywords
Development studies
Downloads
References
1. African Development Bank. (2024). Annual development effectiveness review 2024: Investing in Africa’s resilience and inclusive growth.afdb.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Agrieconomist. (2024) Dairy cooperatives: Boosting rural economics. The Agricultural Economist.agrieconomist.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. American Farm Bureau Federation. (2024). The crucial role of farmer cooperatives and why active participation matters (Market Intel). fb.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Birchall, J. (2003). Rediscovering the cooperative advantage: Poverty reduction through self-help (COOP Working Paper). International Labour Office.ilo.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dughana, M. (2024). Sustainable agricultural ecology, economics and ecosystems; A review of sustainable practices in Africa. African Journal of Social Sciences, 15(2), 1112-130.ajol.info [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ellis. (2002). Rural Livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Fairtrade International. (2024). Living Income Reference Price: Methodology and guidance.fairtrade.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. FAO. (2022). FAO statistical yearbook 2022: World food and agriculture: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.fao.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2022). Cooperatives: An Introduction-Advancing inclusive and sustainable development [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2023). Good performance and inclusiveness of poor people in cooperatives and other producer organizations (policy brief). FAO.doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2024). FAO statistical yearbook 2024: World food and agriculture.FAO.doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Food and Agriculture Organization, International Fund for Agricultural Development, UNICEF, World Food Programme, & World Health Organization. (2024). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Geffersa, A. G. (2024). Agricultural cooperative membership and welfare of maize farmers in Ethiopia: Insights from panel data analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 95(4), 1223-1250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Heffernan, E. (2025). Questionnaires: Definition, design & examples. QuillBot. https://quillbot.com/blog/questionnaire/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. ICA. (2023). World cooperative monitor 2023.Intrenational Cooperative Alliance.monitor.coop [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. International Labour Organization. (2023, September 20). Room document 14: Measuring cooperatives-A progress update on the ILO pilot study on the applicability and implementation of the guidelines concerning statistics of cooperatives in five countries (21st ICLS). ILO.ilo.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kumse, K., Suzuki., Sato, T., & Demont., (2021). The spillover effect of direct competition between marketing cooperatives and private intermediaries: Evidence from the Thai rice value chain. Food Policy, 101, 102037.doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Li, Y., Liu, X., & Chen, Z. (2023). The pricing strategy of the agricultural product supply chain with farmers cooperatives as the core enterprise. Agriculture, 13(2), 456.doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Magakwe, N., & Olorunfemi, O. (2024). A systematic review of the trends, effects, and deterrents of collective marketing participation among smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agriculture, 14(11), 2005. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14112005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. McLeod, S. A. (2024). What is a questionnaire and how is it used in research? Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/questionnaires.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. MetroBi. (2024). Agricultural cooperatives: Importance, types, pros & cons.metrobi.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ministry of Cooperative Development and Marketing (2008) Cooperative Development Policy, 2008, Nairobi, Ministry of Cooperative Development and Marketing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Onyango, V. A., Owuor, G., Rao, E. J., & Otieno, D. J. (2023). Impact of cooperatives on smallholder dairy farmers’ income in Kenya. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(2), 2291225. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2291225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Onyango, V. A., Owuor, G., Rao, E. J., & Otieno, D. J. (2023). Impact of cooperatives on smallholder dairy farmers’ income in Kenya. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(2), 2291225. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2291225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sustainable Agricultural Ecology. (2024). Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment ,2 (1). Wiley.doi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Taherdoost, H. (2024). Sample size determination: The relationship between sample size and population size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 7, 45-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. The Shillong Times. (2025, May 31). How state’s farmers are reaping global rewards. The Shillong Times.theshilongtimes.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. UCA. (2024). ICA annual report 2024. International Cooperative Alliance.ica.coop [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study