Effectiveness of Eco-Friendly Management Practices in the Management of Termite Infestation in Semi-Arid Areas of Uganda: A Case Study of Nakasongola District
Authors
Department of Agribusiness and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Uganda Martyrs University, Uganda. (Uganda)
Department of Agribusiness and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Uganda Martyrs University, Uganda. (Uganda)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800392
Subject Category: Environmental Science
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 6032-6047
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-06
Accepted: 2026-06-11
Published: 2026-09-06
Abstract
The problem of termite infestations is an alarming issue that negatively impacts agriculture and rural livelihoods in semi-arid areas of Uganda, with Nakasongola District among the areas severely affected within the cattle corridor. Although considerable damage, accounting for about 30% crop destruction worth UGX 200 million per year, has been reported in terms of termite infestation, the current measures used for the prevention and control of termites have been largely chemically-based approaches that have proven to be ineffective. In this research paper, we examine the effectiveness of five eco-friendly practices: cultural, physical, biological, botanical, and integrated pest management in the management of termite infestation in semi-arid areas of Nakasongola District, Uganda. A cross-sectional survey design combining both quantitative and qualitative methods was used. The data were collected from 264 respondents using structured questionnaires and from 16 key informant interviews. The analysis used descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression in SPSS version 23. Results revealed that cultural control practices have the strongest and most significant influence on reducing termite infestations (β = 0.356, p < 0.01), followed by the botanical control practices (β = −0.220, p < 0.01) when practiced. Biological control practices have a significant positive relationship (β = 0.245, p < 0.01), despite the difficulties faced during implementation under semi-arid conditions, followed by integrated pest management with a weak positive effect (β = 0.124, p < 0.05). The physical control practices had no significant influence (β = −0.015, p = 0.832). The five control practices, taken together, accounted for 32.4% of termite infestation management (R² = 0.324). The study concludes that cultural and botanical methods are the most viable eco-friendly approaches for managing termite infestation in semi-arid areas, while physical controls are ineffective as standalone interventions. Biological and integrated pest management methods require improved training, timing, and monitoring to deliver intended outcomes.
Keywords
cultural control practices; biological control practices; botanical control practices; integrated pest management
Downloads
References
1. Abdou, L., Moussa, B., & Boubacar, Y. (2017). Community-based use of botanical repellents for termite control in reforestation programs in Niger. Journal of Arid Environments, 138, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Acda, M. N. (2018). Physical barriers and baiting systems in termite management. Pest Management Science, 74(3), 511–519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adomako, J., Narveh, E., Yeboah, S., Amankwa-Yeboah, P., Frimpong-Anin, K., Haleegoah, J., & Adablah, R. (2024). Building the resilience of smallholder farmers to climate-induced pests and diseases through promotion of CS-IPM innovations. AICCRA Reports, Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Akhtar, Y., & Isman, M. B. (2018). Botanical insecticides for pest management in agroecosystems. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 16(1), 123–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Akutse, K. S. (2011). Use of plant extracts and entomopathogenic fungi for management of termites in smallholder farms in Ghana [PhD Thesis, University of Ghana]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bajo, R. A., & Acda, M. N. (2016). Efficacy of chitin synthesis inhibitor baits against subterranean termites in the Philippines. Sociobiology, 63(2), 701–708. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chouvenc, T. (2008). Colony defence mechanisms in termites and implications for biocontrol. Insectes Sociaux, 55(4), 334–341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dawes-Gromadzki, T. Z. (2007). Termite assemblage composition and activity in different savanna habitats. Austral Ecology, 32(1), 55–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Enagbonma, B. J., Mmushi, R., & Babalola, O. O. (2025). Biotechnological utilization: The potential role of the termite gut symbiotic microbiome. Symbiosis, 95, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Evans, T. A., & Iqbal, S. (2015). Physical termite barriers and foundations. Journal of Structural Pest Management, 12(1), 23–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. FAO. (2017). Integrated pest management and sustainable agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Girma, H., Gorfu, D., & Admasu, A. (2009). Reduction of termite damage through crop legume integration in sorghum fields in Ethiopia. Pest Management Journal of Ethiopia, 13(1), 15–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Harris, W. V. (1971). Termites: Their recognition and control (2nd ed.). Longmans. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Isman, M. B. (2006). Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annual Review of Entomology, 51, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ito, A. (2023). Global termite methane emissions have been affected by climate and land-use changes. Scientific Reports, 13, 17195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Khan, A., & Ahmad, A. (2020). Neem bioformulations and soil microbial diversity in termite-infested fields in Pakistan. Bioresource Technology Reports, 11, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kiwuso, P. (2004). Indigenous knowledge and practice in termite management in Uganda. NARO Technical Report. National Agricultural Research Organisation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kogan, M. (1998). Integrated pest management: Historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 243–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kwizera, V., & Gençer, N. S. (2024). Analysis of some plant extracts' repellency and land use impacts on termites. Discoveries in Agriculture and Food Sciences, 12(2), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Loko, Y. L. (2017). Termite diversity and damage to crops in semi-arid regions of West Africa. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 19(2), 150–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Logan, J. W. M. (1990). Termite damage to crops and natural vegetation in Africa. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin, 38(3), 87–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Maniania, N. K., Ekesi, S., & Songa, J. M. (2001). Managing termites in maize with Metarhizium anisopliae under field conditions in Kenya. Insect Science and Its Application, 21(1), 41–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Milner, R. J., & Staples, J. A. (1996). Biological control of termites: Results and experiences within a CSIRO project in Australia. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 6(4), 3–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Acts Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Mugerwa, S. (2011). Termite ecology and management in Uganda's rangelands. National Livestock Resources Research Institute, NARO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Mugerwa, S., Zziwa, E., Mpairwe, D., Sabiiti, E. N., Peden, D., & Tenywa, M. M. (2011). Termite density and vegetation structure in semi-arid rangelands of Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 49(3), 290–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mulatya, J. (2021). Termite-induced crop losses and management options in dryland Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 86(1), 12–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Mwanja, C. K., Ishengoma, R., Banana, A., Terziev, N., & Kalanzi, F. (2024). Effectiveness of selected preservatives in protecting bamboo against termite attack. East African Journal of Forestry and Agroforestry, 7(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Nakasongola District Local Government. (2021). District agricultural productivity and pest management report. Nakasongola, Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Namutebi, A. (2015). Ethnobotanical approaches to termite management in central Uganda. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11(1), 67–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. NARO. (2022). Community-based assessment of termite infestation in Nakasongola District. National Agricultural Research Organisation, Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. NEMA. (2022). Guidelines for climate-smart and ecological pest management in Uganda. National Environment Management Authority. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Nyeko, P., & Olubayo, F. M. (2005). Participatory assessment of farmers' experiences of termite problems in agroforestry in Tororo District, Uganda. Agroforestry Systems, 64(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Oesterlund, A. H. (2014). Pesticide use, health and environment — Uganda 2010–2013: Intervention evaluation among smallholder farmers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 71(7), 466–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Raiesi, F., & Asadi, E. (2006). Soil microbial activity and litter decomposition in grazed versus ungrazed semi-arid grasslands. Applied Soil Ecology, 33(1), 88–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Rouland-Lefèvre, C. (2011). Termites as pests of agriculture. In D. E. Bignell, Y. Roisin, & N. Lo (Eds.), Biology of termites: A modern synthesis (pp. 499–517). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Rust, M. K., & Su, N. Y. (2012). Managing social insects of urban importance. Annual Review of Entomology, 57, 355–375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Sandino, J., Wooler, A., & Gonzalez, F. (2017). Towards the automatic detection of pre-existing termite mounds through UAS and hyperspectral imagery. Sensors, 17(10), 2196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Sekamatte, B. M. (2000). Effect of Metarhizium anisopliae on termite damage and maize yield in Uganda. ASARECA/IITA Collaborative Research Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Sekamatte, B. M. (2001a). Promotion of termite predators using protein and sugar-based soil amendments in maize fields. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(2), 33–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Sekamatte, B. M., Ogenga-Latigo, M., & Russell-Smith, A. (2003). Effects of maize-legume intercrops on termite activity, predatory ant populations and maize yields in Uganda. Crop Protection, 22(1), 87–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Sileshi, G. W., Nyeko, P., Nkunika, P. O. Y., Sekematte, B. M., Akinnifesi, F. K., & Ajayi, O. C. (2009). Integrating ethno-ecological and scientific knowledge of termites for sustainable termite management and human livelihoods in Africa. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Smith, R. F., & Van den Bosch, R. (1967). Integrated control. In W. W. Kilgore & R. L. Doutt (Eds.), Pest control: Biological, physical, and selected chemical methods (pp. 295–340). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Su, N. Y. (1994). Field evaluation of a hexaflumuron bait for population suppression of subterranean termites. Journal of Economic Entomology, 87(2), 389–397. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Su, N. Y., & Scheffrahn, R. H. (1998). A review of subterranean termite control practices and prospects for the future. Sociobiology, 32(1), 1–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Topp-Jørgensen, E. (2009). Hunting pressure and mammal population densities in East African savannahs. Oryx, 43(3), 412–421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Verma, M., Sharma, S., & Prasad, R. (2009). Biological alternatives for termite control: A review. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 63(8), 959–972. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Yonas, M. (2015). Termite damage assessment and management options for smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25(2), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Zhao, C., Lu, H., Cheng, R., Zhao, P., Zhang, G., Chen, H., Tang, Q., & Liu, L. (2026). Spray-applied RNA interference biopesticides: Mechanisms, technological advances, and challenges toward sustainable pest management. Horticulturae, 12(2), 137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Seasonal Variations of Some Physico-Chemical Parameters of Ramsagar Dighi, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
- Why Pollution Endures: Geographic Foundations of Environmental Crisis in Russia’s Industrial Heartlands
- Occurrence of Microplastics in Hijo River Sediments, Davao Region, Philippines
- Assessing the Contribution of Microfinance to Women’s Economic Empowerment in Rural Bangladesh Author Details
- Waste-To-Energy: A Strategy for Urban Sprawl Management in Enugu Metropolis, South East, Nigeria