Self-Efficacy and Its Impact on Task Value and Writing Anxiety
Authors
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Johor Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Selangor Kampus Dengkil (Malaysia)
Universiti Poly-Tech Malaysia (Malaysia)
Shangri-La Group (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800468
Subject Category: English
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 7302-7321
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-26
Accepted: 2026-08-31
Published: 2026-09-08
Abstract
Self-efficacy, task value, and writing anxiety are key motivational constructs that influence learners’ engagement and performance in writing. Higher levels of self-efficacy and perceived task value are associated with greater motivation and lower writing anxiety, while low self-efficacy can increase learners' anxiety during writing tasks. Therefore, examining these constructs across genders and fields of study can provide valuable insights for developing more effective, targeted writing instruction. This study was conducted to explore the influence of self-efficacy on task value and writing anxiety. This quantitative study was conducted to explore the influence of self-efficacy on task value and writing anxiety. A convenience sample of 230 participants responded to the survey. Overall, the findings indicate that learners demonstrated high writing self-efficacy and task value while experiencing moderate cognitive and somatic anxiety but low avoidance behaviour, suggesting that positive motivational beliefs may support continued engagement in English writing despite the presence of writing-related anxiety. The findings suggest that writing instruction should address both learners’ motivational beliefs and their emotional experiences.
Keywords
writing anxiety, self-efficacy, task value, ESL learners
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024). Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. WH Freeman and Company, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Busse, V., Graham, S., Müller, N., & Utesch, T. (2023). Understanding the interplay between text quality, writing self-efficacy and writing anxiety in learners with and without migration background. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1130149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 313-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A historical overview and contemporary perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Fortuna, R.S. (2025) Lowering the filter: The role of attitude in English language acquisition. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(3), 2274-2287. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.3.1020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. He, L. (2024) The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study if Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Hussain, M. A. (2018). Language anxiety and attitude of secondary school students towards learning English. Pakistan Journal of Education, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.30971/pje.v35i1.564. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Li, B. (2022). Research on correlation between English writing self-efficacy and psychological anxiety of college students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 957664. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957664 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Rahmat,N.H., Rahman, S.A.S.A., & Supiee,H.S. (2026) Writers’ Block in Academic Writing: A Systematic Literature Review of Types, Causes, & Intervention. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 10(2), 3703-3717. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Shen, X., Ismail, L., Jeyaraj, J. J., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Metacognitive strategies, writing self-efficacy and writing anxiety in different learning modes: A two-wave longitudinal model. System, 126, Article 103485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Vetter, T.R. (2017) Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When , Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595, 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Yang, J. (2025). The affective filter hypothesis and its enlightenment for college English [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. teaching. Contemporary Education Frontiers, 3(6), 3029-1879. https://t- api.whioce.com/uploads/file/asp/20251029140925e159c2250.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners’ motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Zhou, J., Wang, S., & Wang, J. (2022). Investigating high schoolers’ L2 writing anxiety, L2 writing self-efficacy, L2 writing self-regulated strategies, and L2 writing engagement: Relationships and mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1012407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C. (2021). Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Enhancing English Vocabulary Skills for Grade 9 Students ‘Using Deal or No Deal’ Game
- Enhancing Grade 8 English Engagement: Fill My Bag Strategy
- Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ Communication Competence: An Input to a Communication Skills Development Module
- Lower Secondary School Students' Attitude toward Reading in English
- Learner Autonomy and Attitudes toward Philippine English: Predictors of Grammar Performance among College ESL Students