Familiarity of Teachers with Hearing Impairment on Kenya Revenue Authority Services in Kakamega County, Kenya

Authors

Elizabeth Njoki Ndirangu

Department of Early Childhood and Special Needs Education, Kenyatta University (Kenya)

Dr. Francis Muriithi

Department of Early Childhood and Special Needs Education, Kenyatta University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800485

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 7531-7538

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-22

Accepted: 2026-08-27

Published: 2026-09-09

Abstract

This study assessed the familiarity of teachers with hearing impairment on services offered by the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) in Kakamega County, Kenya. Specifically, the study examined familiarity with the iTax platform, social media support, phone call services, physical KRA services, tax exemption services, Electronic Tax Invoice Management System (eTIMS) services, and tax refund services. A descriptive mixed-methods research design was adopted. Data were collected from 13 teachers with hearing impairment who were selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Structured questionnaires were used to collect quantitative data, while interviews provided qualitative information. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages in SPSS Version 27, while qualitative responses were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed considerable variation in familiarity across the KRA services. Physical KRA services and tax exemption services recorded the highest levels of familiarity, with 77% of respondents reporting that they were aware or very aware of each service. Familiarity with tax refund services was also relatively high, with 76.9% reporting that they were aware or very aware of refund eligibility, application procedures, required documents, and processing duration. In contrast, familiarity with the I tax platform was relatively low, with only 38.4% reporting that they were aware or very aware, while 61.6% were slightly aware or not aware. Social media support recorded the lowest level of familiarity, with 69.3% reporting that they were slightly aware or not aware. Phone call services showed moderate familiarity, with 53.8% being aware or very aware. Familiarity with eTIMS services was generally low, particularly eTIMS Online, eTIMS e-Client, and third-party integrators, for which 76.9% of respondents were not aware. The study concludes that teachers with hearing impairment had uneven familiarity with KRA services, with significant gaps in digital and communication-based services. The study recommends disability-inclusive communication strategies, including captioned tutorials, pictorial guides, sign-language content, accessible digital platforms, and targeted taxpayer education.

Keywords

hearing impairment; Kenya Revenue Authority; KRA services; iTax; accessibility

Downloads

References

1. Adhikari P. Taxpayer knowledge and compliance in Nepalgunj: Evidence from Inland Revenue Office users. Journal of Tax Administration. 2020;6(2):45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. African Disability Forum. [Title of report not provided in the manuscript]. African Disability Forum; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fjeldstad OH, Heggstad K. Local government revenue mobilisation in Anglophone Africa. Chr. Michelsen Institute; 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hendayana Y, Nugraheni AP, Rahmawati D. Perceptions of e-filing technology and tax knowledge among taxpayers with disabilities in Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Taxation. 2021;13(4):115–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Huyck JJ, et al. Supporting equity and inclusion of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals in professional organizations. Trends in Hearing. 2021;25:1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. International Labour Organization. Inclusion of persons with disabilities in public services and employment. International Labour Organization; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Masuku M, Moroe N, van der Merwe D. The world is not only for hearing people: Experiences of deaf women in healthcare. Disability & Society. 2021;36(9):1503–1522. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Muriithi P. The effect of Persons with Disability Act 2003 on income tax revenue collection in Kenya. [Unpublished manuscript/research report]. 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Musimenta D. [Title not provided in the manuscript]. [Publication details not provided]; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. National Taxpayers Association. Pesa zetu, haki yetu (2025): Towards fiscal justice—Addressing tax concerns of persons with disabilities in Kenya. National Taxpayers Association; 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ndungu J, Waweru R. Digital inclusion in Kenyan public services. Journal of Information Systems in Africa. 2023;15(2):78–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. OECD. Taxpayer education and compliance improvement strategies. OECD Publishing; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. United Nations. Accessibility and inclusive governance report. United Nations; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. United Nations Development Programme. [Title of report not provided in the manuscript]. United Nations Development Programme; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Health Organization. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. World Health Organization; 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles