Developing Strategic Competence through Multimodal Strategy-Focused Instruction in EFL Speaking Classrooms
Authors
Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru (Malaysia)
Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru (Malaysia)
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yulin University, Yulin (China)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800523
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 8010-8027
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-24
Accepted: 2026-08-29
Published: 2026-09-10
Abstract
Strategic competence enables EFL learners to sustain spoken communication when linguistic resources are insufficient, yet it remains unclear whether multimodal strategy-focused instruction offers benefits beyond conventional explicit communication strategy instruction. This study examined the effects of multimodal strategy-focused instruction on communication strategy use among Chinese first-year English majors and explored learners’ perceptions of the instructional approach. A sequential mixed-methods design was employed. The final sample comprised 30 students: the experimental group (EG; n = 16) and the control group (CG; n = 14). Over eight weeks, both groups received explicit instruction in the same eight communication strategies; the EG received systematic multimodal support through visual, auditory, linguistic, and gestural resources, whereas the CG received conventional strategy instruction. Communication strategy use was assessed through pre- and post-test speaking tasks and analysed using descriptive statistics, paired-samples t-tests, independent-samples t-tests, and Cohen’s d. Semi-structured interviews with eight EG participants were analysed thematically. Significant increases in fillers and hesitation devices and self-initiated repair were found in both groups. At post-test, the EG showed significantly higher use of circumlocution, meaning negotiation strategies, approximation, and non-linguistic means, while no significant between-group differences were found for fillers and hesitation devices, self-initiated repair, restructuring, or comprehension checks. Interview findings indicated that learners generally perceived multimodal strategy-focused instruction as engaging, cognitively supportive, and conducive to contextualised communication, while also identifying linguistic, affective, and practice-related constraints. Overall, the findings suggest that explicit strategy instruction can support strategic development under both instructional conditions, while systematic multimodal integration may provide additional benefits for strategies involving flexible meaning construction, interaction, and embodied communication.
Keywords
strategic competence, communication strategies, multimodal strategy-focused instruction, EFL speaking
Downloads
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Caprario, M. (2025). ELF communication strategies: A pedagogical intervention pilot study. TESOL Quarterly, 59(1), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5070/L462005216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chen, W.-C. (2025). Verbal-visual skill-building and perceptional changes in English presentation. English for Specific Purposes, 77, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.10.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.51997005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lee, S. S., & Azman, H. (2022). Introducing a responsive multimodal oral presentation pedagogy: Integrating TED videos with Web 2.0, collaborative learning and teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 53(3), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220945426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Mei, A., & Nathalang, S. S. (2010). Use of communication strategies by Chinese EFL learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 110–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Milliner, B., & Dimoski, B. (2024). The effects of communication strategy training on speaking task performance. RELC Journal, 55(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221085781 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Nakatani, Y. (2010). Identifying strategies that facilitate EFL learners’ oral communication: A classroom study using multiple data collection procedures. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00987.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Peker, B. G., & Erdemir, N. (2021). Does compensation strategy instruction work? An action research study. ELT Journal, 75(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Pu, P., & Chang, D. Y.-S. (2025). Effects of different input modes on blended EFL speaking instruction: A quasi-experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(5–6), 1223–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2273853 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Rahmanu, I. W. E. D., & Molnár, G. (2024). Multimodal immersion in English language learning in higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(19), e38357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Wang, J., Gao, Y., & Cui, Y. (2023). Classroom gesture instruction on second language learners’ academic presentations: Evidence from Chinese intermediate English learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 66, 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Wang, Y., & Soo, R. S. (2024). Identifying Chinese college EFL students’ needs for an oral communication instruction module. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(3), 598–611. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i3.27860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study