Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of Online Learning Among Higher Learning Institutions' Students in Sabah

Online learning is a preferred and essential tool used by many public and private institutions. In this era of digitalization, it has become evident that the use of online platforms is the new norm, and the widespread adoption of online learning urges students to know how to use digital tools, have a positive attitude towards the online learning environment, and actively engage in online discussions. This study aimed to determine the levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding online learning among diploma and bachelor's students in Sabah. This study is quantitative and uses a cross-sectional survey administered via Google Forms. The number of respondents collected was 256 from both diploma and bachelor's degree levels. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The study is expected to enhance understanding of current levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding online learning, as evidenced by the test results and discussion of the findings. This study also serves as a reference for future researchers who intend to explore KAP-related studies in online learning or extend the framework to other educational contexts.

Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, Online Learning, Higher learning Institution Students.

1. Alam, Fahad & Yang, Qing & Bhutto, Muhammad & Akhtar, Dr. Nadeem. (2021). The Influence of E-Learning and Emotional Intelligence on Psychological Intentions: Study of Stranded Pakistani Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. 715700. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, A., Amin, S. B., McCarthy, G., Khan, A. M., & Nepal, R. (2022). Is blended learning the future of education? Students' perspective using discrete choice experiment analysis. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Atack, L., & Rankin, J. (2002). A descriptive study of registered nurses’ experiences with web-based learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40(4), 457–465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College students' use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bali, S. & Liu, M. C. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1108, p. 1–8. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A., (1976). Social Learning Theories. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p. 247.http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2666-660X(22)00019-6/sref7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015, October 1). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education environments: A systematic review. Internet High Educ., 27(C), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Barz, N., Benick, M., Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, L., & Perels, F. (2024). Students’ acceptance of e-learning: Extending the technology acceptance model with self-regulated learning and affinity for technology. Discover Education, 3, Article 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00195-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chuang, H. H., Weng, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cook, D. A., Levinson, A. J., Garside, S., Dupras, D. M., Erwin, P. J., & Montori, V. M. (2010). Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med., 85(5), 909–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. J Educ Technol Syst, 49, 5-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Herrin, D. (2001). E-learning directions for nurses in executive practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 31(1), 5–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hung, M., Licari, F. W., Hon, E. S., Lauren, E., Su, S., Birmingham, W. C., et al. (2021). In an era of uncertainty: Impact of COVID-19 on dental education. J Dent Educ, 85, 148-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ho, C. M., Cheong, K. Y., & Weldon, A. (2023). Predicting student participation in online discussions: The role of confidence and communication preferences. Education and Information Technologies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. EDUCAUSE Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jafar, A., & Dollah, R., & Dambul, R., & Mittal, P., & Ahmad, S. A., & Sakke, N., & Mapa, M. T., & Joko, E. P., & Eboy, O. V., & Jamru, L. R., & Wahab, A. A. (2022). Virtual learning during COVID-19: exploring challenges and identifying highly vulnerable groups based on location. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(17), 11108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kumar, B., Pinky, S. D., & Nurudden, A. M. (2021). Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19 guidelines among students in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Humanit Open, 4(1), 100194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Martin, Florence & Bolliger, Doris. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22, 205–222. 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modelling,4(2), i–xx https://jasemjournal.com/wp content/uploads/2020/08/Memon-et-al_JASEM_-Editorial_V4_ Iss2_June2020.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pettyjohn, T., & LaFrance, J. (2014). Online credit recovery: benefits and challenges. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Education Leadership Review of Doctoral Research, 1(1), 204–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rasheed, Abubakar Rasheed, Kamsin, Amirrudin, & Abdullah, Nor Aniza. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 23(1), 101–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rosi, R. I. (2021). Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) survey on online learning among university students in Malang. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Education: Sustainable Education Transformation in the Disruptive Era (pp. 136–144). Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ruiz, Jorge & Mintzer, Michael & Leipzig, Rosanne & Portal, Arabic. (2006). The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education. Academic Medicine. 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sarwar, S., & Akram, M. (2021). KAP analysis of students regarding e-learning during COVID-19 in universities of Lahore. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 8(2), 25–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Saxena, N., Hugar, S. M., Soneta, S. P., Dialani, P. K., Kohli, N., & Patil, V. H. (2022). Knowledge, attitude, and practices about online education during the COVID-19 outbreak among dental professionals in India: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research KLEU, 15(2), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_68_22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sim, S. P.-L., Sim, H. P.-K., & Quah, C.-S. (2020). Online learning: A post-COVID-19 alternative pedagogy for university students. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11963 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sit, J. W. H., Chung, J. W. Y., Chow, M. C. M., & Wong, T. K. S. (2005). Experiences of online learning: students’ perspective. Nurse Education Today, 25(2), 140–147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Soon, K. H., Sook, K., Jung, C. W., & Im, K. M. (2000). The effects of Internet-based distance learning in nursing. Computer in Nursing, 18(1), 19–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sreekumar, D., & Sreekumar, D. (2025b, June 25). What is Research Methodology? Definition,Types,andExamples. Paperpal Blog. https://paperpal.com/blog/academic-writing-guides/what-is-research-methodology [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. UNESCO IESALC. (2020). COVID-19 and higher education: Today and tomorrow: Impact analysis, policy responses and recommendations. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Vanslambroucka, S., Zhu, C., Lombaerts, K., Philipsen, B., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Students' motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vaszkun, Balázs & Szakács, Katalin. (2025). Looking for student success factors outside of the educators' scope: The effect of digital literacy, personal skills, and learning habits and conditions on self-evaluated online learning effectiveness in management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 23, 101188. 10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vargas-Garrido, H. Defining conceptual boundaries of knowledge attitudes and practices to improve validity in public health research. Discover Public Health 23, 978 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-026-02372-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Visalam, A., Kumar, A. P., Prakash, A. O., & Padmavathi, R. (2015). Knowledge, attitude and practice towards e-learning among medical undergraduate students. IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, 7(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.9790/4861-07430104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Gong, S., Wang, Z., Li, N., & Ai, L. (2022). Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: the mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learn Individual Differences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study