GABAY: Andragogical Primer for BTLED and BTVTED Students

Andragogy is a concept in education as it emphasizes how adults learn through experience, meaningful engagement, and self-directed learning, while guiding teachers in designing instruction for lifelong learners. Andragogy is an essential concept in education and a significant gap to explore with the use of the adult-learning theory teaching patterns and the implementation processes of andragogy in education settings to optimize the process of enhancing the ability of students. This study aimed to describe the implementation processes of andragogy in the Bachelor of Technical Vocational Teacher Education (BTVTED) and Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education (BTLED) programs at ISPSC-Cervantes Campus. Specifically, it sought to identify the mechanisms employed by teachers, the challenges they encounter, and the coping strategies they utilize in implementing andragogy. Through cool and warm analyses of extended texts, the findings revealed instructors’ perspectives on adult learning, particularly in relation to their instructional practices, encountered challenges, and adaptive strategies. The findings further showed instructors practiced flexibility and guided the learners through hands-on, collaborative, experiential, flexible, and engaging learning experiences. It is designed to address challenges such as family responsibilities, technological distractions, and attendance issues in their class. Overall, the GABAY Primer reflects an andragogical framework derived from participants’ experiences, promoting responsive and learner-centered instruction.

adult learning, andragogical mechanism, collaborative learning, experiential learning, hands-on learning

1. Akin, G. (2014). The term of andragogy and the difference between andragogy and pedagogy. Journal of Faculty. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001327. of Educational Sciences, 47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aldiabat, K. M., & Le Navenec, C. (2018). Data Saturation: The mysterious step in grounded theory methodology. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 245-261. DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ampler, J., Glaraga, E., Fabe, I., & Cayogyog, A. (2024). Self-concept, adult learner experience, readiness to learn, orientation of learning, motivation to learn as correlates of adult learners learning styles. IJRSS International Journals. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.807069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Annual Report. (2017). Master list of conducted learning interventions. Department of Social Welfare and Development, Field Office-Cordillera Administrative Region. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arutmayanti, N. & Hiryanto, H. (2023). Implementation of the andragogy approach in educational settings: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i8.4980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Azarias, R.A., et al. (2020). Free will in pedagogy: phenomenologizing the experiences of seasoned teachers. International Academic Journal of Education and Literature, 1(7): 324-329. DOI: 10.47310/iajel.2020.v01i07.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Azarias, A. R., Ballocanag, R., Ramos, A. O. …. & Holmes, M. V. M. (2020). Freewill in pedagogy: phenomenologizing the lived experiences of seasoned teachers. International Academic Journal of Education & Literature, 1(7), 329-334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bajracharya, J. (2019). Instructional design and models: ASSURE and Kemp. Journal of Education and Research 2019, 9(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v9i2.30459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Biao, I. (2022). Financing adult learning and education (ALE) now and in future. International Review of Education, 68(2), pp.213-231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Biedermann, D., Schneider, J., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Digital self-control interventions for distracting media multitasking—A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1217–1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12581 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bilqis, Syachruroji, A., & Taufik, M. (2016). Perbedaan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam antara model problem based learning dengan model pembelajaran langsung. JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar), 2(2), 147 155. https://doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v2i2.794. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Birenbaum, M. (2023). The chatbots’ challenge to education: Disruption or destruction? Education Sciences, 13(7), 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bouchrika, I. (2026). The Andragogy Approach: Knowles’ Adult Learning Theory Principles for 2027. Copyright © 2026 Research.com. All rights reserved. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bustillo, R. C. T., Bustillo, R. C. T., & Sayson, J. A. V. (2024). Navigating the dual roles: Understanding the unique challenges of student-mothers in pursuit of higher education. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 58–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10634332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Brookfield, S. (2006). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cabulay, D., Luis, M., Lapitan, A., Sibayan, R., Alonzo, K., Bacuyag, A., Dela Cruz, I., Cacut, K., Caliboso, L., Agluba, F., Alberto, J., Vargas, D., Serrano, J., Pascual, M., Cablarda, M., Casauay, F., Medinaceli, D., & Canonizado, R. (2023). Doble kara: Uncovering stories of student-parents' challenges amidst education. THE QUESTER: Lal-lo National High School Research Journal, 1(1), 105-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Cachero-Paderog, J. (2023). Flexible learning in higher education institution: Experiences of instructors in a private higher institution. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research. Volume 53. https//doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v53i1.624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Caruth, G. (2014). Meeting the needs of older students in higher education. Participatory Educational Research (PER). Retrieved from www.partedres. com/archieve/issue_1_2/3-per_14-09_volume_1_ issue_2_page_21_35.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Chan, S. (2010). Applications of andragogy in multi-disciplined teaching and learning. Journal of Adult Learning, 39(2), 25–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ930244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Chen, M. A., Hwang, G., & Chang, Y. (2019). A reflective thinking‐promoting approach to enhancing graduate students’ flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2288 2307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Commission on Higher Education. (2017). CMO No. 78, series of 2017: Policies, standards and guidelines for the Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education (BTLEd). Retrieved from www.ched.gov.ph. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Commission on Higher Education. (2017). CMO No. 79, series of 2017: Policies, standards and guidelines for the Bachelor of Technical-Vocational Teacher Education (BTVTEd). Retrieved from www.ched.gov.ph. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Creswell, J. (2002). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd edition). ISBN-10. 0761924426. ISBN-13. 978-0761924425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Creswell, J. (2009), Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches/John W. Creswell. – 3rd ed. p. cm. ISBN 978-1-4129-6557-6 (pbk.). Copyright 2009 by SAGE Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Creswell, J. (2014). “Qualitative inquiry research design: choosing among five traditions”. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Dayagbil, F., Palompon, D., Garcia, L., & Olvido, M. (2021). Teaching and learning continuity amid and beyond pandemic. Front. Educ., 23 July 2021 Sec. Higher Education Volume 6 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. DEVELOPING INTELLECTUAL SKILLS USING COLLABORATIVE LEARNING TOOLS: THE EXPERTS’CONSENSUS. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 6(1), 284 308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Diah Rusmala D. (2019). Pengembangan kurikulum di indonesia dalam menghadapi tuntutan abad Ke-21. As-Salam: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan, 8(1), 1 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. https://doi.org/10.51226/assalam.v8i1.123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Dontre, A. J. (2021). The influence of technology on academic distraction: A review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Dopo, F. B. & Ismaniati, C. (2016). Persepsi guru tentang digital natives, sumber belajar digital dan motivasi memanfaatkan sumber belajar digital. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.21831/tp.v3i1.8 280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Francis J.J, M. Johnston, C. Robertson, L. Glidewell , V. Entwhistle , M.P. Eccles , & J.M. Grimshaw (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-driven interview studies. Psychol.Health, 25(10):1229-1245. DOI:10.1080/08870440903194015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Franco, D., & Cunha, A. (2020). An integrative debate on learning styles and the learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho. 2020.100017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Galad, A., Betts, D., & Campbell, N. (2024). Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices. Sec. Higher Education Volume 9 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Galustyan, O. V., Borovikova, Y. V., Polivaeva, N. P., Bakhtiyor, K. R., & Zhirkova, G. P. (2019). E-learning within the field of andragogy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(9), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i09.10020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Gittings L., Taplin R., & Kerr R. (2020). Experiential learning activities in university accounting education: a systematic literature review. J. Account. Educ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. 52, e100680. 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Guest G., Bunce A., Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Hansen, U., Munkhaugen, E., & Larsen, K. (2025). Parental perspectives on school attendance problems and the role of municipal support systems. Sec. Child Mental Health and Interventions. Volume 4 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2025.1589988 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Haryono., Ginanjar F., & Rosyalita, D. (2025). The effectiveness of collaborative learning strategies in enhancing critical thinking skills among general education students. The Journal of Academic Science. Vol 2 No 7 2025 || E-ISSN 2997-7258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Janchai, W., Siddoo, V., Sawattawee, J. (2019). Andragogy teaching patterns appropriate for work-integrated learning in the information technology industry. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 2019, 20(3), 283-299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Kapur, S. (2019). The adult learner - meaning and significance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335464277_The_Adult_Learner_Meaning_and_Signif icance?fbclid=IwAR1La_DhfrB6oXtkpTg98WTdjIkaHyvHpE8syUrw f_4edXmSX0S8V00RU0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Kimaro, E. M., Machumu, H. J., Kalimasi, P. J., & Heikkinen, A. (2022). Challenges of adult education provision towards social sustainability at the Institute of Adult Education-Morogoro Campus. Journal of Adult Education (JAET), (24), 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Knowles M. S. The modern practice of adult education: andragogy versus pedagogy, 1970, Association Press, New York, NY, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Knowles, M.S.(1973), The modern practice of adult education, Association Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Knowles, M. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: andragogy versus pedagogy. (Revised and updated ed.). Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Knowles M. S. The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy, 1980, Association Press, Chicago, IL, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Knowles, M.S. The adult learner: a neglected species. 4th ed. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Knowles, M. S. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species / Malcolm Knowles Building blocks of human potential (3rd ed.). Houston: Gulf Pub. Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F. & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th Edition). Burlington, MA: Elsevier, Inc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Kuluşaklı, E. (2025). Student engagement and flexibility in distance learning in higher education. Sage Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251329979 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Kuncoro, K. S., Martadiputra, B. A. P., Jupri, A., & Hendriyanto, A. (2023, November). A rapid review of the impact of digital distraction on mathematics online learning. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 2909, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0181943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Laid, S.M., & Adlaon, M. (2025). A systematic review of innovative teaching strategies in science: Exploring hands-on learning, technology integration, and student-centered approaches. Acta Pedagogia Asiana. Volume 4(2), 2025, 101‒114 https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v4i2.645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Lapele, F., Kartowagiran, B., Haryanto, H., & Wahyunanto, E. (2021). Heutagogy : The most holistic approach utilizing technology in learning. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2021), 640(Iccie), 154–159. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iccie-21/125969682. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Loeng, S. (2020, August 28). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Wiley Online Library. Education Research International, 2020(1) 3816132. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Mandlelize, P. & Sepeng, M. (2024). Exploring challenges of adult learners in selected adult education and training centers in South Africa: An analysis of Knowles’ theory of andragogy. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 11(1), 2024, 152 – 160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15258155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. McCombes, S. (2023, November 20). What is a case study? | definition, examples & methods. Scribbr. Retrieved January 20, 2026. from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/case-study/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Mendoza, H.G. (2021). Teaching-learning methods in the business development and management program of a Philippine graduate school. JIRSEA Issue: Vol. 19 No. 1, May/June 2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Mercado, F. (2024). Grounded theory on creating and maintaining adult education programs in selected higher education institutions in the Philippines. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 1455-1475. ISSN: 2165-8714. https://www.eu-jer.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 12–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. https://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/Issue_PDF/TIMReview_November2017.pdf#p age=12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Morse, J. M. (2004). Theoretical saturation. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Morse, J.M. (2015). Data were saturated… Qual. Health Res. 25(5):587–588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Munna, A. & Kalam, M. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: Literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4, 1-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Park, J., Gremp, M., & Shin, M. (2026). Effects of interactive and hands-on learning experience of assistive technology on college students’ perspectives and knowledge. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13942-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Radovan, M. (2024). Workplace flexibility and participation in adult learning. Sustainability 2024, 16(14), 5950; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Radović, S., Hummel, H., & Vermeulen, M. (2021). The challenge of designing ‘more’ experiential learning in higher education programs in the field of teacher education: A systematic review study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFELONG EDUCATION. 2021, VOL. 40, NOS. 5–6, 545–560https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2021.1994664. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Raharjo, S. (2023). Improving learning activities and outcomes with problem-based learning based on andragogy approach, Journal of Education Science, 1(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Ramanan, B., Mohamad, M. and Ambon, J. (2024). Transformation of education through continuous professional development: enhancing teacher competence towards excellence in performance. 1. 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Rands, V. F., S., H., Gerrits, R., & Jensen, M. (2021). Implementing guided inquiry active learning in an online synchronous classroom and its impact on test question performance. HAPS Educator, 25(2), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.21692/haps.2021.015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Risley, L. & McKee, S. (2012). Andragogy methods applied to adult learning environments: Adult education for adult learners in and out of the traditional classroom. Presented at the Research to Practice Conference in Adult and Higher Education, Lindenwood University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Roldan, A., Abarrientos, M., Malate, L., Pescador, R., Tahir, R., Ablen, A. (2020). Challenges encountered by student-parents at Bestlink College of the Philippines: Its effects on their academic performance. Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines Journal of Multidisciplinary Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Roffarello, A. M., & De Russis, L. (2023). Achieving digital wellbeing through digital self-control tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(4), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Sandelowski M. Theoretical saturation. In: Given LM, editor. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. pp. 875–876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Sälzer, C., Ricking, H., & Feldhaus, M. (2024). Addressing school absenteeism through monitoring: A review of evidence-based educational policies and practices. Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102, Published by MDPI 2024, 14(12), 1365; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121365 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Seyoum, Y. & Basha, G. (2017). Andragogical methods to sustain quality adult education in Ethiopia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1034a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Sicam, E., Umawid, M., Colot, J., Dagdag, J., Handrianto, C. (2021). Phenomenology of parenting while schooling among filipino college student mothers in the province. Kolokium Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/kolokium-pls.v9i2.483 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Soultati, E. (2023), Comparison of pedagogy and andragogy teaching methods. International Journal for Innovation Education Research. ISSN: 2411-2933. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. httpps://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol11.iss10.4175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Stapa, M. (2019). The use of ADDIE Model for designing blended learning application at vocational colleges in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat dan Multimedia Asia-Pasifik, 8(1), June 2019: 49 – 62 e-ISSN: 2289-2192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. http://www.ftsm.ukm.my.apjitm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Velasco, Y. (2023). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions towards the implementation of adult education as the nexus of continuing education in Philippine higher education institutions. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 28(1), 132-149. https://tinyurl.com/7c55xrn2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2024). Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 10–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Yang, R., Yang, X., & Shabbir, M.S. (2026). Experiential learning postgraduate education: fostering professional skills and entrepreneurial mindsets. International Journal of Educational Development. Volume 122, April 2026, 103534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Yin, J., Goh, T. T., & Hu, Y. (2024). Interactions with educational chatbots: The impact of induced emotions and students’ learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00480-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Yu, H., Li, M., Li, Z., Xiang, W., Yuan, Y., Liu, Y., and Xiong, Z. (2020). Coping style, social support and psychological distress in the general Chinese population in the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic. BMC Psychiatry, 20: 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Zagir, T., & Dorner, H. (2021). Revisiting competences of adult learning facilitators: Perspectives from the Mongolian context. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 28, 184 - 207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714211003100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Zhalgassova, А., S. Utebaev, G., Koishigulova, L., &Zhubangalieva, G. (2020). Andragogical approaches and principles in the system of continuous education. , 66, 25-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. https://doi.org/10.51889/2020-2.1728-5496.04. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study