Academic Self-Efficacy, Online Learning Motivation, and Perceptions of ChatGPT Among Higher Education Students

Authors

Norhisyam Jenal

Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)

Siti Aishah Taib

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)

Nadzrah Sa’adan

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)

Maisarah Noorezam

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)

Siti Mariam Mohammad Iliyas

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang (Malaysia)

Aini Ahmad

Pusat Pengajian Bahasa, Tamadun dan Falsafah, Universiti Utara Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800685

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 10140-10164

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-26

Accepted: 2026-08-31

Published: 2026-09-16

Abstract

Online learning requires students to maintain confidence and motivation while independently managing academic and technological challenges. The growing use of ChatGPT has introduced further opportunities and concerns regarding technology-supported learning. This study examined academic self-efficacy, online learning motivation, and perceptions of ChatGPT among higher-education students. It also investigated differences according to gender, field of study, and level of study and examined the relationships among the variables. A quantitative survey design was employed with a convenience sample of 162 respondents. Data were collected using a 53-item, five-point Likert-scale questionnaire adapted from Fowler (2018) and Youssef et al. (2024) and analysed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and Pearson correlation analysis. Students generally demonstrated positive academic self-efficacy, online learning motivation, and perceptions of ChatGPT. No significant differences in online learning motivation or perceptions of ChatGPT were identified according to gender or field of study. However, degree students demonstrated higher online learning motivation and more positive perceptions of ChatGPT than diploma students. Academic self-efficacy was positively related to expectancy, value, social support, and perceptions of ChatGPT. The findings highlight the importance of strengthening students’ confidence, providing meaningful and socially supportive online learning experiences, and integrating ChatGPT through structured AI-literacy guidance that promotes critical and responsible use.

Keywords

academic self-efficacy; online learning motivation; ChatGPT; higher education students; technology-supported learning

Downloads

References

1. Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S. A. (2024). Reliability analysis: Application of Cronbach’s alpha in research instruments. In Pioneering the future: Delving into e-learning’s landscape (pp. 114–119). https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/2024-2/Articles/20244_ReliabilityAnalysis-ApplicationOfCronbachsAlphaInResearchInstruments.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alqurni, J. (2026). Exploring the role of agentic AI in fostering self-efficacy, autonomy support, and self-learning motivation in higher education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9, Article 1738774. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1738774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Daha, E. S., & Altelwany, A. A. (2025). Exploring the impact of using ChatGPT in light of goal orientations and academic self-efficacy. International Journal of Instruction, 18(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18210a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. DSpace@MIT. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fowler, K. S. (2018). The motivation to learn online questionnaire [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia]. University of Georgia Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/fowler_kevin_s_201805_phd.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. He, L. (2024). The application of SPSS correlation analysis in the study of precision teaching of English in universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jeilani, A., & Abubakar, S. (2025). Perceived institutional support and its effects on student perceptions of AI learning in higher education: The role of mediating perceived learning outcomes and moderating technology self-efficacy. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1548900. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1548900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jenal, N., Taib, S. A., Syed Abdul Rahman, S. A., Sa’adan, N., Zakaria, N., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Keeping students motivated in online learning: An exploration of value, expectancy, and social support. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(7), 1251–1265. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.907000103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mahande, R. D., Fakhri, M. M., Suwahyu, I., & Sulaiman, D. R. A. (2026). Unveiling the impact of ChatGPT: Investigating self-efficacy, anxiety and motivation on student performance in blended learning environments. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 18(1), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2024-0372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rahmat, N. H. (2026). Exploring the relationship between online reading strategies and ChatGPT usage among undergraduates. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i1.1071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Taib, S. A., Jenal, N., & Rahmat, N. H. (2024). Exploring the relationship between variables for online learning motivation among undergraduates. International Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, 19(2), 377–397. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/95115/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Easterday, C. A., Dinh, J. M., JaKa, M. M., Kottke, T. E., & Canterbury, M. (2021). Impact of demographic survey questions on response rate and measurement: A randomized experiment. Survey Practice, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles