Sustainable Nickel Downstreaming Governance in Indonesia: A Maqasid al-Shari'ah Perspective

This study examines two contrasting governance configurations for nickel downstreaming in Indonesia: the Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park (IMIP) in Central Sulawesi, representing a speed-and-scale, vertically integrated industrialization model, and PT Vale Indonesia's operations in Sorowako, South Sulawesi, representing a comparatively established, hydropower-supported, and sustainability-oriented model. Rather than comparing a company with an industrial estate as if they were equivalent organizational units, the study defines the analytical object as the governance configuration through which nickel is mined, processed, energized, regulated, and connected to local and national benefit distribution. The study uses a qualitative comparative case-study design and a transparent documentary protocol. The documentary corpus contains 24 sources: nine peer-reviewed journal articles, one working paper, six books, six institutional or policy/industry sources, and two corporate sustainability reports. Case-performance evidence is prioritized for 2019–2026, while foundational theoretical sources are retained irrespective of publication year. Evidence is coded deductively across economic, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dimensions and then evaluated through Hifz al-Nafs, Hifz al-Bi'ah, Hifz al-Mal, intergenerational responsibility, and the cross-cutting principles of amanah, adl, maslahah, and dar'u al-mafasid. The comparison indicates that IMIP generates strong maslahah through investment, employment, value-chain integration, and industrial scale, but faces greater challenges associated with fossil-based energy, emissions, occupational safety, and cumulative ecological pressures. PT Vale shows comparatively stronger alignment with human and ecological protection, particularly through hydropower and environmental management, while questions remain concerning the breadth and durability of economic benefit distribution. The paper argues that Maqasid is not simply an Islamic vocabulary for ESG: it changes the decision rule by treating benefits and harms as morally ordered, requiring proportionality, prevention of avoidable harm, accountability for stewardship, and conversion of non-renewable wealth into durable human, social, and ecological capital. On this basis, the paper proposes a Maqasid-Based Sustainable Nickel Industrialization Framework.

nickel downstreaming; resource governance; ESG; Maqasid

1. Akhmad, A. F., Nawawi, J., & Rusdi, M. (2026). Implementation of the occupational safety and health program in the mining sector: Case study in the mining area of Morowali Regency, Central Sulawesi. Journal of Government Science Studies, 5(2), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.66254/jgssvol5issue2page278-285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2001). Ri'ayat al-bi'ah fi shari'at al-Islam [Environmental care in Islamic law]. Dar al-Shuruq. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andreoni, A., & Chang, H.-J. (2019). The political economy of industrial policy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.08.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arianto, S., & Ginting, P. (2023). Multinational corporations and nickel downstreaming in Indonesia. Action for Ecology and People's Emancipation (AEER). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Auty, R. M. (1993). Sustaining development in mineral economies: The resource curse thesis. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fauzi, M. I., Hasibuan, A. I., Munirah, M., Hayati, S. M., & Fitriyati, I. D. (2026). From Qur'anic environmental ethics to Islamic ecological jurisprudence: A maqāṣidī reconstruction in response to the climate crisis. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v26i1.20396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Foltz, R. C., Denny, F. M., & Baharuddin, A. (Eds.). (2003). Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Handayani, P. (2026). Maslahah dan pelestarian lingkungan: Telaah kritis atas teori Maqasid Al-Syari'ah Wahbah Al-Zuhayli dalam menjawab isu ekologi kontemporer. Journal of Islamic Law and Wisdom, 2(1), 1–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Energy Agency. (2025). Global critical minerals outlook 2025. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Energy Agency. (2026). Global critical minerals outlook 2026. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kurniawan, A. A., & Fadlillah, I. (2025). From anthropocentric to ecocentric jurisprudence: A maqasid-based reconstruction of Islamic environmental ethics toward intergenerational equity. Al'Adalah, 28(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.35719/aladalah.v28i2.666 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2011). Fatwa MUI No. 22 Tahun 2011 tentang pertambangan ramah lingkungan [MUI Fatwa No. 22 of 2011 on environmentally responsible mining]. MUI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Muhyiddin, M., Pardede, T., Nugroho, H., & Mendatu, A. (2026). The industry–settlement–environment nexus in a nickel-based industrial zone: DPSIR analysis and spatial planning policy implications in Morowali Regency, Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 10(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v10i2.860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Natural Resource Governance Institute. (2023). Resource Governance Index: Indonesia assessment. NRGI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nugroho, H., & Azizah, N. S. (2026). Resource-driven industrial urbanization: Nickel development and the transformation of mining processing towns in Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 10(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v10i1.832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nugroho, H., Widiatmoko, U., Al-Wafiy, M., Widyatuti, N. L., & Wahyuningrat, J. (2026). Struktur, tantangan, dan masa depan industri nikel Indonesia: Dari raja cadangan menuju raja nilai tambah. Bappenas Working Papers, 9(3), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v9i3.602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. PT Vale Indonesia Tbk. (2019). Improving responsibly: Sustainability report 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. PT Vale Indonesia Tbk. (2025). Sustainability report 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sinn, H.-W. (2008). Public policies against global warming: A supply side approach. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(4), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. United Nations Global Compact. (2004). Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluation of Groundwater Quality for Domestic Use in Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria
• Contribution of Water Vendors in Mitigating Water Scarcity in Keffi Town, Keffi Local Government Area, Nasarawa State, Nigeria