From Cultural Capital to Curricular Liberation: Centering Minoritized Students’ Knowledge, Identity, and Communities

Authors

Caroline Chance

Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, , United States of America (USA) (USA)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800962

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 14005-14008

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-01

Accepted: 2026-09-09

Published: 2026-09-24

Abstract

This manuscript examines how minoritized students, including Black, Latinx, Indigenous, and immigrant students, serve as active producers of cultural knowledge that enriches the broader educational community [2, 3, 4, 5]. Drawing on scholarship on abolitionist teaching, funds of knowledge, community cultural wealth, community-based education, reality pedagogy, Indigenous educational theory, and teacher learning [1–8, 12, 13], this paper argues that when curriculum is responsive to community life rather than treated as fixed and culturally neutral, schools can become sites of agency, belonging, and liberation [1, 6, 13]. The analysis considers how students’ identities and histories can be represented in the curriculum, how such representation can broaden the worldviews of all learners, and how educators must engage in continual reflection and professional learning [8, 12, 13]. It also considers culturally responsive practices that schools can cultivate students' sense of belonging, which is linked to positive academic, social and emotional, behavioral, and health effects [9–11, 14].

Keywords

Minoritized students; cultural capital; curricular liberation; funds of knowledge; community cultural wealth

Downloads

References

1. Love, B. L. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brayboy, B. M. J. (2005). Toward a Tribal Critical Race Theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baldridge, B. J., Beck, N., Medina, J. C., & Reeves, M. A. (2017). Toward a new understanding of community-based education: The role of community-based educational spaces in disrupting inequality for minoritized youth. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16688622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Emdin, C. (2016). For white folks who teach in the hood … and the rest of y’all too: Reality pedagogy and urban education. Beacon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Allen, K. A., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. [Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Korpershoek, H., Canrinus, E. T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. H., & de Boer, H. (2020). The relationships between school belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta-analytic review. Research Papers in Education, 35(6), 641–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles