Empowering Responsible Digital Citizens: A Survey of Cyberbullying and Digital Citizenship Among Adolescents in an International School

As schools become increasingly reliant on digital platforms for learning and communication, the responsible and humane use of technology has become central to learner wellbeing. This mixed-methods study examined cyberbullying involvement, the forms it takes, adolescents' awareness of responsible digital citizenship, and teacher-leaders' school-based responses within an international school context. Quantitative data were gathered through the Adolescent Online Behaviour and Digital Practices Survey administered to 30 students from Years 7 to 11, with descriptive statistics computed in IBM SPSS (v.24). Qualitative data were drawn from semi-structured interviews with two purposively selected teacher-leaders and analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis. The findings indicate that cyberbullying is present across victim, perpetrator, and bystander roles, with hostile messaging, rumour-spreading, online exclusion, sharing of private content, and impersonation among the reported forms. Students demonstrated strong awareness of responsible online conduct, yet confidence in reporting incidents to teachers was notably weaker, with the majority of respondents undecided. Teacher-leaders consistently framed cyberbullying as a wellbeing and safeguarding concern, described detection as dependent on student reporting and digital evidence, and identified inconsistent policy implementation as a central challenge. The study contributes contextualised insight into digital citizenship and cyberbullying in international schooling and offers practical implications for humanising technology-rich learning environments through clearer reporting pathways, coordinated whole-school responses, and sustained digital citizenship education.

cyberbullying; digital citizenship; adolescents; international school; teacher-leader perspectives; whole-school approach

1. Adeoye, M. A., et al. (2021). Semi-structured interviewing in qualitative educational research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Journal of Educational Research and Practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, S., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in educational research: Principles and applications. International Journal of Research and Method in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bali, D., Pastore, M., Indrio, F., Giardino, I., Vural, M., Pettoello-Mantovani, C., & Pettoello-Mantovani, M. (2023). Bullying and cyberbullying increasing in preadolescent children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bell, M., Keles, S., Furenes Klippen, M. I., Caravita, S. C. S., & Fandrem, H. (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cooperation within the school community to overcome cyberbullying: A systematic scoping review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bickham, D. S., Moukalled, S., Inyart, H. K., & Zlokower, R. (2021). Evaluating a middle-school digital citizenship curriculum (Screenshots): Quasi-experimental study. JMIR Mental Health, 8(9), e26197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cabrera, M. C., Larrañaga, E., & Yubero, S. (2024). Bullying and cyberbullying in secondary education: A comparison between secondary schools in rural and urban contexts. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 41(4), 617-631. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Capuno, R., Suson, R., Suladay, D., Arnaiz, V., Villarin, I., & Jungoy, E. (2022). Digital citizenship in education and its implication. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(2), 426-437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Carvalho, M., Branquinho, C., & de Matos, M. G. (2021). Cyberbullying and bullying: Impact on psychological symptoms and well-being. Child Indicators Research, 14(1), 435-452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dichek, N. P., Antonets, N. B., Shevchenko, S., Kopotun, I. M., & Pohribna, D. V. (2021). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Implementation of the cross-cultural approach in the modern school. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(4), 210-244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ferreira, P. C., Simão, A. V., Paiva, A., & Ferreira, A. (2020). Responsive bystander behaviour in cyberbullying: A path through self-efficacy. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(5), 511-524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fischer, S. M., John, N., & Bilz, L. (2021). Teachers' self-efficacy in preventing and intervening in school bullying: A systematic review. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 3(3), 196-212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Flôres, F. N., Visentini, D. M., Faraj, S. P., & Siqueira, A. C. (2022). Cyberbullying in the school context: Teachers' perceptions. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 26, e226330. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Helfrich, E. L., Doty, J. L., Su, Y. W., Yourell, J. L., & Gabrielli, J. (2020). Parental views on preventing and minimizing negative effects of cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Iorga, M., Agati, M., Coutinho, L., Gizir, R., Malinauskienė, D., Milios, P., & Colibaba, C. (2023). Why are teachers not always willing to fight against cyberbullying? The Medical-Surgical Journal, 127(1), 99-121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Joshi, A., & Joshi, R. (2021). Likert scale: Explored and explained. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khairy, M., Mahmoud, T. M., Abd-El-Hafeez, T., & Mahfouz, A. (2021). User awareness of privacy, reporting system and cyberbullying on Facebook. In International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications (pp. 613-625). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kidwai, I., & Smith, P. K. (2024). A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies in England: Signs of progress. Educational Psychology in Practice, 40(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kowalski, R. M., & Wingate, V. S. (2023). Cyberbullying in children and adolescents. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Cyberbullying and Values Education, 13-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lee, J., Choo, H., Zhang, Y., Cheung, H. S., Zhang, Q., & Ang, R. P. (2025). Cyberbullying victimization and mental health symptoms among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Macaulay, P. J., Betts, L. R., Stiller, J., & Kellezi, B. (2021). The more public it is, the more severe it is: Teachers' perceptions on the roles of publicity and severity in cyberbullying. Research Papers in Education, 36(6), 726-753. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Malik, M., Awang, H., Mansor, N. S., Zolkipli, M. F., Zaini, K. M., & Al-Mashhadani, A. F. S. (2024). Unveiling the shadows: The influence of anonymity and fake accounts on cyberbully intention in social media. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, 5(4), 19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Masoumi, D., Bourbour, M., Edling, S., Gill, P., & Francia, G. (2025). School staff strategies for identifying, dealing with and preventing cyberbullying among Swedish primary school pupils. Computers in the Schools, 42(4), 366-387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Negri-Ribalta, C. (2022). Anonymity and response authenticity in sensitive survey research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Survey Research Methods. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Pennell, D., Campbell, M., & Tangen, D. (2020). What influences Australian secondary schools in their efforts to prevent and intervene in cyberbullying? Educational Research, 62(3), 284-303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ponsford, R., Falconer, J., Melendez-Torres, G. J., & Bonell, C. (2022). Whole-school interventions promoting student commitment to school to prevent substance use and violence: Synthesis of theories of change. Health Education Journal, 81(5), 614-637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Razali, N. A., & Nawang, N. I. (2022). An overview of the legal framework governing cyberbullying among children in Malaysia. IIUM Law Journal, 30, 207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Reneses Botija, M., Riberas Gutiérrez, M., & Bueno Guerra, N. (2025). It's just a joke: Gender, sexuality and trivialisation in adolescent online violence such as cyberhate, cyberbullying, and online grooming. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Saruddin, M. Z., Fattah Azman, A. Z., Mohd Zulkefli, N. A., & Isa, M. R. (2025). Prevalence of cyberbullying and its associated factors among high school students in Klang District, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences, 21(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Seçkin-Kapucu, M., Özcan, H., & Karakaya-Özyer, K. (2021). The relationship between middle school students' digital literacy levels, social media usage purposes and cyberbullying threat level. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 5(2), 537-566. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Shahaf-Oren, B., Madan, I., & Henderson, C. (2021). A lot of medical students, their biggest fear is failing at being seen to be a functional human: Disclosure and help-seeking decisions by medical students with health problems. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sharma, S., et al. (2023). The strengths of mixed-methods research in social and educational inquiry. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Silke, C., Brady, B., Boylan, C., & Dolan, P. (2021). Empathy, social responsibility, and civic behavior among Irish adolescents: A socio-contextual approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(7), 996-1019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Skamagki, G., King, A., Carpenter, C., & Wåhlin, C. (2024). The concept of integration in mixed methods research: A step-by-step guide using an example study in physiotherapy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 40(2), 197-204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sorrentino, A., Esposito, A., Acunzo, D., Santamato, M., & Aquino, A. (2023). Onset risk factors for youth involvement in cyberbullying and cybervictimization: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1090047. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Weil, J. (2025). Descriptive statistics in educational research: Practical applications. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Wong, R. Y. M., Cheung, C. M., Xiao, B., & Thatcher, J. B. (2021). Standing up or standing by: Understanding bystanders' proactive reporting responses to social media harassment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Information Systems Research, 32(2), 561-581. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Yuniawati, E. I., Tiatri, S., & Beng, J. T. (2024). Strengthening digital citizenship behavior to reduce cyberbullying through learning outcome mediation. ENLIGHTEN: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 7(2), 82-108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Zhu, C., Huang, S., Evans, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 634909. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study