Teachers' Perceptions and Strategies of Positive Reinforcement in Malaysian Primary Schools: A Phenomenological Study

Positive reinforcement is widely promoted as an effective classroom management approach, yet little is known about how Malaysian primary school teachers actually perceive and apply it in their daily practice. This study explored teachers' perceptions of positive reinforcement and the strategies they use to deliver it in primary classrooms. A qualitative, descriptive (Husserlian) phenomenological design was adopted, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with five primary school teachers from Selangor, Johor, Perak, Penang, and Kuala Lumpur, selected through purposive sampling. The interview data were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that teachers hold strongly positive perceptions of positive reinforcement, viewing it as an effective means of encouraging good behaviour, building student confidence, and creating a supportive and engaging learning environment. Teachers reported actively using a wide repertoire of reinforcement strategies, including verbal praise, tangible rewards such as stickers, stars, and points, non-verbal gestures such as smiling and clapping, group-based rewards, extra playtime, and the assignment of responsibilities such as class leadership roles. Positive reinforcement was also perceived to improve student behaviour, classroom participation, and emotional responses, with students described as happier, prouder, more confident, and more cooperative when their efforts were recognised. Teachers' accounts were not uniformly celebratory: they also stressed that reinforcement must be used properly and in moderation, expressing concern that over-frequent tangible rewards can foster dependence and weaken students' own motivation. As lived experience, reinforcement emerged less as a technique these teachers applied than as a relational habit through which they read, encouraged, and sustained their students day to day. The study concludes that, for these participants, positive reinforcement was understood as more than a behaviour management tool; they regarded it as a way of supporting students' emotional development and engagement. The findings imply that teachers should combine multiple reinforcement strategies and balance extrinsic rewards with the cultivation of intrinsic motivation, and, while the small sample means the findings cannot be generalised to Malaysian primary teachers as a whole, they offer transferable insights for teacher training and classroom management practice.

Positive reinforcement, teachers' perceptions, reinforcement strategies, classroom management, primary education

1. Abdulrazak, S., Mohammed Bello, H., & Abubakar, S. (2025). Effect of positive reinforcement on addressing school avoidance and enhancing academic motivation among junior secondary school students in low-income communities in Niger State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education Effectiveness Research, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.70382/hijeer.v07i8.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Acuff, S. F., MacKillop, J., & Murphy, J. G. (2023). A contextualized reinforcer pathology approach to addiction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(5), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00167-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adam Ismail, I. (2023). Using positive reinforcement to increase student engagement in the classroom [Master's thesis, Minnesota State University Moorhead]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adeniran, A. O., & Tayo-Ladega, O. (2024). Critical analysis of phenomenological research design in a qualitative research method. Management Analytics and Social Insights, 1(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.22105/ad338t15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Afdaliah, N. (2022). Teachers' gestures in EFL classroom. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa, 7(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v7i2.2735 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmed, M. M., Rahman, A., Hossain, M. K., & Tambi, F. B. (2022). Ensuring learner-centred pedagogy in an open and distance learning environment by applying scaffolding and positive reinforcement. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 17(3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-05-2022-0064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ahmed, S. K. (2025). Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 5, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Aleman, J. (2024). The effectiveness of a reward system: Introducing positive reinforcement and analyzing the effects of withdrawal of reinforcer on behavior [Master's thesis, Trinity Christian College]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Baharudin, S. N. A., Nair, S. M., Siew, K. H., Amer Nordin, F. B., Mechael, P. D., Mohamad, S. N. H. B., & Perumal, S. (2025). Investigating primary school teachers’ perceptions on the effectiveness of TikTok in enhancing speaking skills in the ESL classroom. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(8), 1438–1451. https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i8.9641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Belina, A. (2023). Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society. Voluntary Sector Review, 14(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080522X16454629995872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bibi, S., Mahnaz, W., Akhter, N., Kiani, J. A., & Manzoor, A. (2023). Students' perception about teachers' classroom behavior at secondary level. Al-Qanṭara, 9(3), 242–257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bolat, Ö. (2023). Developing a scale to measure parents' reward and praise behaviours for parental involvement. The Universal Academic Research Journal, 5(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.55236/tuara.1344360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bonghawan, R. G. G., & Macalisang, D. (2024). Teachers' learning reinforcement: Effects on students' motivation, self-efficacy and academic performance. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 12(02), 3218–3228. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i02.el08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bonna, K. (2023). Concept and nature of classroom management practices. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Research, 11(4), 1601–1615. https://doi.org/10.53075/Ijmsirq/098433453367 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chen, X. (2023). A study of using reward and punishment in the education of school-aged children—based on behaviorism theory operant conditioning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(1), 86–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dorji, C. (2025). The power of reinforcement strategies: Evaluating its impact on behavioral change in a Bhutanese classroom. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(6), 478–491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dunne, G. (2025). Resisting edutainment: How reward deficiency syndrome fuels the student attention crisis. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-025-10022-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Edulan, J. M. R., Tabenas, I. J. B., & Baluyos, G. R. (2025). Enhancing classroom management through simplifying transitions with clap (cue-based learning prompt). International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(9), 630–644. https://doi.org/10.51584/ijrias.2025.100900064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fatima, S., Kirmani, N. S., & Tanweer, L. (2023). Impact of reinforcement strategies on students' learning behaviors in classroom at primary level. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(4), 276–283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fitriyati, F., Hengki, H., & Aprizani, Y. (2022). Junior high school students' interest in English speaking supported by classmates and teacher. Proceeding: Islamic University of Kalimantan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gabion, N., Decatoria, A., Ladia, M., & Huliganga, H. J. (2025). Exploring positive reinforcement as a strategy to reduce challenging behaviors in early childhood classrooms. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 41(3), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.410308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 14, 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hardin, C., & Hardin, C. J. (2024). Effective classroom management: Models and strategies for today's classrooms. BoD–Books on Demand. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hasanah, M., Arafat, Y., Barni, M., Raya, A. T., & Aprilianto, A. (2024). Teachers' strategies for managing disruptive behavior in the classroom during the learning process. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 628–645. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i3.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hassan, Z. T., Shadrach, A., & Gboyega, O. S. (2024). Effect of behaviour modification strategy (positive reinforcement) in reducing truancy among public senior secondary school students in Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. Journal of Advanced Education and Sciences, 4(1), 9–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Herawati, N., Jafari, M., & Sanders, K. (2024). Teachers' perceptions of the efficacy of positive behavior support systems. International Journal of Education and Cognitive Sciences, 5(2), 8–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Johler, M., Krumsvik, R. J., Bugge, H. E., & Helgevold, N. (2022). Teachers' perceptions of their role and classroom management practices in a technology rich primary school classroom. Frontiers in Education, 7, 841385. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.841385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Joshi, P. D., Li, C., & Walker, D. O. (2024). Classroom leadership roles activity: A pathway to sharing leadership with student teams. Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629241264548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Karatsareas, P. (2022). Semi-structured interviews. In Research methods in language attitudes (p. 99). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kardiyanto, D. W., Wijanarko, B., & Himawanto, W. (2025). Effect of positive reinforcement on underhand passing skills among secondary school students. Jurnal SPORTIF: Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 11(3), 547–563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Khanum, B., Sardar, R., & Bajwa, T. H. (2025). Role of positive reinforcement strategies in students learning performance at elementary level. ASSAJ, 4(01), 2218–2235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Khumalo, D. N., & Makondo, P. V. (2023). Challenges faced by primary school teachers in including learners with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the mainstream classrooms in the Hhohho Region, Eswatini. The Journal of Research & Method in Education, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1304042036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Khuman, P. (2024). The impact of non-verbal communication in teaching: Enhancing educational effectiveness. A Global Journal of Humanities, 7(89), 89–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Killeen, P. R. (2023). Theory of reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 120(3), 289–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.880 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kim, M., Albers, N. D., & Knotts, T. L. (2023). Academic success through engagement and trust fostered by professor leadership style. Education Sciences, 13(6), 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Leeder, T. M. (2022). Behaviorism, Skinner, and operant conditioning: Considerations for sport coaching practice. Strategies, 35(3), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052776 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Leek, J., Rojek, M., Dobińska, G., & Kosiorek, M. (2026). Navigating the power of time in classroom practices: Teachers' and students' perspectives. Educational Review, 78(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2024.2438878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Lim Kok Seng, E. (2024). Investigating teachers' views of student-centred learning approach. https://doi.org/10.60692/1f683-kq689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Maisarah, M. (2024). Enhancing children's learning motivation through positive reinforcement: A classroom communication strategy. Jurnal Smart, 10(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.52657/js.v10i1.2289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Mamuaya, C. L. (2025). Building better behavior: How school environments shape student character. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 13(05), 4105–4112. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v13i05.el05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Margolang, N., Hemita, N., & Antosa, Z. (2019). The correlations between reward and elementary school students' learning motivation. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education, 2(1), 64–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Mat, N. C., & Jamaludin, K. A. (2024). Effectiveness of practices and applications of student-centered teaching and learning in primary schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(3), 1025–1044. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. McFarland, A., Hill, I., Doden, W., & Benassi, C. (2026). The equality of life game: Examining class-based privilege and inequality in workforce entry through experiential learning. Journal of Management Education, 50(1), 71–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629251374683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Mendoza, D. (2025). Exploring teachers' lived experiences with classroom reinforcements: A phenomenological study. PCU Graduate School of Education Research Journal, 1(1), 97–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Mutaqin, Z., Riyanto, Y., Sholeh, M., Khamidi, A., & Amalia, K. (2024). Implementation of multi-level inclusive learning management in Indonesian schools of Kinabalu City Malaysia. Edukasi, 18(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.15294/edukasi.v18i2.16640 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231205789. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Nair, S. M., Tahir, S. R., Jopius, A. A., & Govindarajoo, M. V. (2025). The impact of play-based learning in teaching English to preschoolers in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(7), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i7.10530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Obilor, E. I. (2023). Convenience and purposive sampling techniques: Are they the same? International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 11(1), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Pan, R., Wang, Q., Cao, J., & Zhou, C. (2024). Deep reinforcement learning for solving steelmaking-continuous casting scheduling problems under time-of-use tariffs. International Journal of Production Research, 62(1–2), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2267693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Polat, A. (2025). Thematic analysis in qualitative research: Common pitfalls and practical insights for academic writing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 16094069251372835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Raof, M. Z., & Aziz, M. N. A. (2025). The usage of positive reinforcement to study its effect on learners' motivation during online class. Practitioner Research, 7(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2025.7.1.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Robinson, O., & Wilson, A. (2022). Transcribing and coding. In Practicing and presenting social research. BCcampus. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Rusli, A. N. (2024). Issues and challenges faced by Malaysian Montessori school teachers in teaching special educational needs children. I. Imre Sándor Neveléstudományi Konferencia, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Sarkar, H. (2025). The power of positive reinforcement in classrooms. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.58402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Shinde, S. (2025). The role of reinforcement strategies in employee retention: A conceptual analysis based on Skinner theory. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, 14(5), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.53983/ijmds.v14n5.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Shoozan, A., & Mohamad, M. (2024). Application of interview protocol refinement framework in systematically developing and refining a semi-structured interview protocol. SHS Web of Conferences, 182, 04006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Susetyarini, R. E., Baiduri, B., Darmayanti, R., Nuryami, N., Siregar, Y. S., Sahara, N., & Suprayitno, K. (2024). Learning reform: Why does behavioral theory prevent interactive teaching? AMCA Journal of Community Development, 4(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.51773/ajcd.v4i1.117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Tan, K. H., Kasiveloo, M., & Abdullah, I. H. (2022). Token economy for sustainable education in the future: A scoping review. Sustainability, 14(2), 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Weinsztok, S. C., Goldman, K. J., & DeLeon, I. G. (2023). Assessing parameters of reinforcement on efficiency of acquisition: A systematic review. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 16(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00715-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Xiao, Y., & Hew, K. F. T. (2024). Intangible rewards versus tangible rewards in gamified online learning: Which promotes student intrinsic motivation, behavioural engagement, cognitive engagement and learning performance? British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13361 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Zahid, L., & Cheema, A. U. (2023). An investigation of the impact of positive and negative reinforcement in motivating student's learning. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(2), 913–923. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-II)81 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Zahroh, A. A., Prastiwi, Y., & Hidayat, N. (2025). Positive reinforcement strategies: Boosting students' achievement. Deleted Journal, 3(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.61787/11znmm64 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study